Advertisement

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 35–40 | Cite as

Real Relationship: The “Something More” of Psychotherapy

  • Charles J. GelsoEmail author
Article

Abstract

Although it often operates silently, the personal relationship is a part of everything that transpires between therapist and client. Following the psychoanalyst Ralph Greenson's (1967) early lead, the term Real Relationship is used to capture this personal aspect of psychotherapy. It is divided into two elements, realism and genuineness; and both these elements are further divided into magnitude and valence aspects. Research on the real relationship is almost nonexistent, and to an important extent this is due to the lack of a reliable, valid, and convenient measure. The author is involved in a research project aimed at developing such measures from both the client and therapist perspective. Examples of items are provided.

real relationship realism genuineness relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bridges, N. A. (2001). Therapist's self-disclosure: Expanding the comfort zone. Psychotherapy, 38, 21–30.Google Scholar
  2. Constantino, M. J., Castonguay, L. G., & Schut, A. J. (2002). The working alliance: A flagship for the “scientist-practitioner model in psychotherapy. In G. S. Tryon (Ed.), Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know (pp. 81–131), Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Couch, A. S. (1999). Therapeutic functions of the real relationship in psychoanalysis. In A. Solnit, P. Neubauer, S. Abrams, & A. Dowling (Eds.), The psychoanalytic study of the child, 54. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gelso, C. J. & Hayes, J. A. (1998). The psychotherapy relationship: Theory, research, and practice. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Greenson, R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis (Vol. 1). NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  6. Menaker, E. (1942). The masochistic factor in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 11, 171–186.Google Scholar
  7. Stolorow, R.D. (2000). Clarifying the intersubjective perspective: A reply to George Frank. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15, 424–427.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations