Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 55–60 | Cite as

A survey of ethical issues surrounding supply of information to members of the public by hospital pharmacy medicines information centres

  • Simon Wills
  • David Brown
  • Sarah Astbury
Article

Abstract

Objectives: To examine ways in which medicines information pharmacists approach ethical dilemmas encountered in information supply, to appreciate the factors affecting any observed variation in responses, and to identify any training deficits among medicines information (MI) pharmacists in this area.Method: A questionnaire was circulated to all medicines information pharmacists working in the hospital pharmacy service in the United Kingdom. The survey presented ten realistic scenarios involving requests for information on a variety of topics from 'lay' callers. Main outcome measures: Respondents were asked to identify any perceived ethical dilemmas presented by the scenarios and to indicate their preferred replies. Details on training given or received in this area were also requested.Results: The overall response rate was 151 of 286 questionnaires mailed (52.8%), representing 137 discrete DI centres throughout the UK. Postgraduate clinical qualifications were possessed by 71% of respondents. Just 32 (21.2%) indicated that they gave training on ethical issues surrounding information supply while 57 (37.1%) said they had received such training. Over half (54.3%) had neither received nor delivered training on ethical issues. Of the 32 who said they gave training, 21 had received training themselves. Only 4 (2.6%) said they had a protocol in place for dealing with enquiries from members of the public.Conclusions: There was considerable variation in how respondents thought the scenarios might be resolved, emphasising the varying levels of appreciation of the issues and lack of a uniform approach to management. An interesting dichotomy emerged between liberal and conservative approaches. Liberal pharmacists clearly believed that all MI data is in the public domain and should be produced and evaluated on request because patients have a "right" to it. The conservative pharmacists had a more protective attitude toward the patient and believed that patients should not be given information by MI pharmacists directly; rather that it should be channelled through the patient's doctor. These two approaches are not incompatible, and may be adopted by the same pharmacist at different times. From their observations, the authors propose a basis of an ethical guideline for MI pharmacists.

Advisory role Dilemma Ethics Hospital pharmacy Medicines information Public 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hands D, Judd A, Golightly P, and Grant E. Drug Information and advisory services-past, present and future. Pharm J 1999;262:160-2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dombrowski SR, Visconti JA. National audit of drug information centres. Am J Hosp Pharm 1985;42:819-26.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnold RM, Nissen JC, Campbell NA. 1987 Ethical issues in a drug information centre. Drug Intel Clin Pharm 1987:21:1008-11.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    United Kingdom Drug Information Pharmacists' Group. Legal and ethical Aspects of Drug Information. In: Judd E. (Ed). UK Drug Information Manual (3rd Edn.), Leeds, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Medicines, Ethics and Practice-A Guide for Pharmacists (25). London, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, July, 2,001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    United Kingdom Drug Information Pharmacists' Group. Directory of hospital pharmacists employed in information work. 1997-1998, Trent Drug Information Centre, Leicester Royal Infirmary, England.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards SJ, Lilford RJ, Thornton J, and Hewison J. Informed consent for clinical trials: in search of the ‘best’ method. Soc Sci Med 1998;47(11):1825-40.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kemper DW. Trust on the health internet. Managed Care Quarterly 2001;9(1):9-18.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelly WN, Krause EC, Krowinski WJ, Small TR, and Drane JF. National survey of ethical issues presented to drug information centres. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:2245-2250Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veatch RM. Hospital pharmacy: what is ethical? Am J Hosp Pharm 1989; 46: 109-115.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith F. Survey research: (1) design, samples and response. Int J Pharm Prac 1997;5:152-166.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Appelbe GE, Wingfield, J. The importance of law and ethics. Pharm J 1998;261:286.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barber N, O'Neill R. 1999 Suggestions for a new code of ethics. Pharm J 1999;262:923-925.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. (4th Edn.) Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seedhouse D. Lovett L. Practical Medical Ethics John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Purtilo R. Ethical dimensions in the health professions. (2nd Edn.) W.B. Saunders, London, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Wills
    • 1
  • David Brown
    • 2
  • Sarah Astbury
    • 3
  1. 1.Wessex Drug and Medicines Information CentreSouthampton General HospitalUK
  2. 2.School of Pharmacy and Biomedical ScienceUniversity of Portsmouth, St Michael's BuildingPortsmouth, HampshireEngland
  3. 3.University of PortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations