Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 285–293 | Cite as

Seed compositional and disease resistance differences among gene pools in cultivated common bean

  • F.M.A. Islam
  • K.E. Basford
  • C. Jara
  • R.J. Redden
  • S. Beebe
Article

Abstract

It is widely accepted that two major gene pools exist in cultivatedcommon bean, one Middle American and one Andean. Recently another gene pool,designated as North Andean and a fourth group (not considered to be adistinct gene pool) have been reported by the senior author and hiscolleagues. Many of the agronomic and seed compositional attributes of the twomajor gene pools are well known, but the seed compositional value and diseaseresistance of the North Andean gene pool has not yet been characterized. Torectify this situation, the seed compositional characters, percentage of proteinconcentrations (phaseolin, lectin and α-amylaseinhibitor), the nutrient elements (calcium, phosphorus, iron andzinc) and the disease and pest attributes (angular leaf spot,anthracnose, common bacterial blight and empoasca damage) were considered.The Middle American gene pool gave higher lectin, calcium, phosphorus, sulfurand zinc than the Andean gene pool but lower phaseolin and iron. The NorthAndean gene pool is more like the Andean gene pool for phaseolin, resistance toangular leaf spot and anthracnose from Andean pathogen isolates, but more likethe Middle American gene pool for lectin, zinc, sulfur and resistance toanthracnose from Middle American pathogen isolates. On the other hand, it hadthe highest iron concentration and was more resistant to common bacterialblight. These results indicate the potential value of this gene pool in a commonbean breeding program.

CIAT Common bean Disease Gene pools Nutrient elements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atunes P.L. and Sgabieri V.C. 1980. Effect of heat treatment on the toxicity and nutritive value of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) proteins. J. Agr. Food Chem. 29: 935–938.Google Scholar
  2. Balardin R.S. and Kelly J.D. 1998. Interaction between Colletotrichum lindemuthianumraces and gene pool diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123: 1038–1047.Google Scholar
  3. Barampama Z. and Simard R.E. 1993. Nutrient composition, protein quality and antinutritional factors of some varieties of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) grown in Burundi. J. Food Chem. 47: 159–167.Google Scholar
  4. Becerra Velásquez L. and Gepts P. 1994. RFLP diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in its centres of origin. Genome 37: 256–263.Google Scholar
  5. Beebe S., Toro O., Gonzalez A.V., Chacón M.I. and Debouck D.G. 1997. Wild-weedy-crop complexes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) in the Andes of Peru and Colombia, and their implications for conservation and breeding. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 44: 73–91.Google Scholar
  6. Bliss F.A. and Brown J.W.S. 1983. Breeding common bean for improved quantity and quality of seed protein. In. In: Janick J. (ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews. AVI Publishers, Westport, Connecticut, USA, pp. 59–102.Google Scholar
  7. Boss C.B. and Fredden K.J. 1989. Concepts, Instrumentation, and Techniques in Inductively Coupled Plasma Automic Emission Spectrometry. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Bromma 1986. LKB 2400 GELSCAN XLTM software. LKB GELSCAN AB, Box 305, S-161 26Sweden.Google Scholar
  9. Bressani R. and Elias L.G. 1977. The Problem of Legume Protein Digestibility. In: Hulse J.H., Rachie K.O. and Billingsley L.W. (eds), Nutritional Standards and Methods of Evaluation for Food Legume Breeders. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  10. Chacón S.M.I., González A.V., Gutiérrez J.P., Beebe S.E. and Debouck D.G. 1996. Increased evidence for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) domesticated in Colombia. Ann. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop. 39: 201–202.Google Scholar
  11. Geffroy V., Sicard D., De Oliveira J.C.F., Sevignac M., Cohen S., Gepts P. et al. 1999. Identification of an ancestral resistance gene cluster involved in the coevolution process between Phaseolus vulgaris and its fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interaction 12: 774–784.Google Scholar
  12. Geffroy V., Sevignac M., De Oliveira J.C.F., Fouilloux G., Skroch P., Thoquet P. et al. 2000. Inheritance of partial resistance against Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in Phaseolus vulgaris and co-localization of quantitative trait loci with genes involved in specific resistance. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interaction 13: 287– 296.Google Scholar
  13. Gepts P. 1988. A middle American and an Andean common bean gene pool. In: Gepts P. (ed.), Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 375–390.Google Scholar
  14. Gepts P. and Bliss F.A. 1986. Phaseolin variability among wild and cultivated common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Colombia. Econ. Bot. 40: 469–478.Google Scholar
  15. Ghaderi A., Adams M.W. and Saettler A.W. 1982. Environmental response patterns in commercial classes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 63: 17–22.Google Scholar
  16. Hambidge K.M. 1989. Mild zinc deficiency in children. In: Mills C.F. (ed.), Zinc in Human Biology, International Life Sciences Institute of Human Nutrition Reviews. Springer-Verlag, UK, pp. 285–295.Google Scholar
  17. Hueth D.O., Maier N.A., Sparrow L.A. and Piggott T.J. 1997. Vegetable Crops. In: Reuter D.J., Robinson J.B. (eds) Auistralian Soil and Plant Analysis Council Inc., Plant Analysis: An International Mannual. CSIRO Publishing, pp. 383–416.Google Scholar
  18. Islam F.M.A. 2001. Evaluation and Utilization of a Common Bean Germplasm Collection, phd, The University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Islam F.M.A., Basford K.E., Redden R.J., Gonzalez A.V., Kroonenbrg P.M. and Beebe S.E. 2001. Genetic variability in cultivated common bean beyond the two major gene pools. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Koehler H.H., Iung-Hsia Chang C.H., Scheier G. and Burke D.W. 1987. Nutrition composition, protein quality and sensory properties of thirty-six cultivars of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Food Sci. 52: 1335–1340.Google Scholar
  21. Meiners C.R., Derise N.L., Lau H.C., Crews M.G., Ritchey S.J. and Murphy E.W. 1976. Proximate composition and yield of raw and cooked mature dry legumes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24: 1122–1126.Google Scholar
  22. Monsen E.R. 1988. Iron nutrition and absorption: dietary factors which impact on iron bioavailability. J. Amer. Diet. Assoc. 88: 786–791.Google Scholar
  23. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1991. Nutrition during pregnancy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Ott R.L. 1993. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 94002Belmont, California.Google Scholar
  25. Pastor-Corrales M.A. 1991. Estandanitación y de designación de ratas de Phyto. Pathology 81: 694–701.Google Scholar
  26. Pastor-Corrales M.A. and Jara C.E. 1995. La evolución de Phaeoisariopsis griseola con el frijol comün en America Latina. Fitopatol. Colomb. 19: 15–24.Google Scholar
  27. Pastor-Corrales M.A., Jara C. and Singh S.P. 1998. Pathogenic variation in, sources of, and breeding for resistance to Phaeoisariopsis griseola causing angular leaf spot in common bean. Euphytica 103: 161–171.Google Scholar
  28. Pennington J.A.T. and Young B. 1990a. Sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus and magnesium in foods from the United States Total Diet Study. J. Food Comp. Anal. 3: 145–165.Google Scholar
  29. Pennington J.A.T. and Young B. 1990b. Iron, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium and iodine in foods from the United States Total Diet Study. J. Food Comp. Anal. 3: 166–184.Google Scholar
  30. Sandlin C.M., Steadman J.R. and Araya C.M. 1999. Isolates of Uromyces appendiculatus with specific virulence to landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris of Andean origin. Plant Dis. 83: 108– 113.Google Scholar
  31. Singh S.P., Gutierrez J.A., Molina A., Urrea C. and Gepts P. 1991a. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean. II. Marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Sci. 31: 23–29.Google Scholar
  32. Singh S.P., Nodari R. and Gepts P. 1991b. Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean: I. Allozymes. Crop Sci. 31: 19–23.Google Scholar
  33. Snedecor G.W. and Cochran W.G. 1989. Statistical Methods. Ames:, Iowa State U.P., 8th ed.Google Scholar
  34. Swanson C.A. and King J.C. 1987. Zinc and pregnancy outcome. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 46: 763–771.Google Scholar
  35. Tohme J., Jones P., Beebe S. and Iwanaga M. 1995. The combined use of agroecological and characterisation data to establish the CIAT Phaseolus vulgaris core collection. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum Th.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds), Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI). A Wiley-Sayce Publication, pp. 95–107.Google Scholar
  36. United Nations 1991. Some options for improving nutrition in the 1990s. SCN News 7: 16–18.Google Scholar
  37. van Schoonhoven A. and Pastor-Corrales M.A. 1987. Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. Centro Interna-W cional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
  38. Yip R. 1994. Iron Deficiency: International Programmatic Approaches A means to better Human Nutrition and Improved Crop Yields? Proceedings of Breeding for Mineral-Dense Seeds: World Bank ‘H-Building’, Washington, D.C..Google Scholar
  39. Young R.A. and Kelly J.D. 1996. Characterization of the genetic resistance to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in common bean differential cultivars. Plant Dis. 80: 650–654.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • F.M.A. Islam
    • 1
  • K.E. Basford
    • 1
  • C. Jara
    • 2
  • R.J. Redden
    • 3
  • S. Beebe
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Land and Food SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.CIATCaliColombia
  3. 3.QDPIHermitage Research StationWarwickAustralia

Personalised recommendations