Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 159, Issue 2, pp 153–169 | Cite as

Population dynamics of Agrimonia eupatoria and Geum rivale, two perennial grassland species

  • Katariina Kivi­niemi
Article

Abstract

The population dynamics of two polycarpic perennials,Agrimonia eupatoria and Geum rivale, characteristic ofsemi-natural grasslands in Scandinavia, were examined in south-eastern Sweden.The perennial forbs were studied for several years in two populations each,located in habitats characteristic for the species in the study area.Demographic transition probabilities varied significantly between populationsand among years for the species. Transition matrix modelling yieldedλ-values (population growth rates) that ranged from 0.89 to 1.14 forA. eupatoria and from 0.94 to 1.04 for G.rivale. The elasticity analysis showed that stasis in the adultstageclasses contributed most to λ. The life-table response experimentanalysis produced similar results as the elasticity analysis, where stasistogether with progression in the adult stage classes made a large contributionto the observed spatial variation in λ. Simulations of expected time toextinction were in the order of centuries for the study populations. Seedlingrecruitment was enhanced by seed addition and small scale disturbance inpopulations. For the intermediately abundant and more patchily distributedA. eupatoria, a regional survey of local populations wasconducted in the study area which revealed that most populations wererelativelysmall (< 100 individuals) and restricted to grassland fragments in roadverges. Furthermore, an attempt was made to estimate fruit dispersal from localpopulations.

Demography Dispersal Habitat fragmentation LTRE analysis Matrix models Recruitment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez-Buylla E.R., García-Barrios R., Lara-Moreno C. and Martínez-Ramos M. 1996. Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: applications and perspectives for tropical rain forest trees. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 387-421.Google Scholar
  2. Bengtsson K. 1993. Fumana procumbens on Öland-population dynamics of a disjunct species at the northern limit of its range. Journal of Ecology 81: 745-758.Google Scholar
  3. Caswell H. 1989. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  4. Caswell H. 2000. Prospective and retrospective perturbation analyses: their roles in conservation biology. Ecology 81: 619-627.Google Scholar
  5. Charron D. and Gagnon D. 1991. The demography of northern populations of Panax quinquefolium (American ginseng). Journal of Ecology 79: 431-445.Google Scholar
  6. Cook R.E. 1985. Growth and development in clonal plant populations. In: Jackson J.B.C., Buss L.W. and Cook R.E. (eds), Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 254-296.Google Scholar
  7. Crawley M.J. 1990. The population dynamics of plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 330: 125-140.Google Scholar
  8. de Kroon H., Plasier A. and Van Groenendael J. 1987. Density dependent simulation of the population dynamics of a perennial grassland species, Hypochoeris radicata. Oikos 50: 3-12.Google Scholar
  9. de Kroon H., Plaisier J., Van Groenendael J. and Caswell H. 1986. Elasticity: the relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology 67: 1427-1431.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrlén J. 1995. Demography of the perennial herb Lathyrus ver-nus: II. herbivory and population dynamics. Journal of Ecology 83: 287-295.Google Scholar
  11. Ehrlén J. 1999. Modelling and measuring plant life histories. In: Vuorisalo T.O. and Mutikainen P.K. (eds), Life history evolution in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 27-61.Google Scholar
  12. Ehrlén J. and Van Groenendael J.M. 1998. The trade-off between dispersability and longevity-an important aspect of plant species diversity. Applied Vegetation Science 1: 29-36.Google Scholar
  13. Ehrlén J. and Eriksson O. 2000. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology: in press (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Ekstam U., Aronsson M. and Forshed N. 1988. Ängar. LT förlag, Stockholm, (Meadows; in Swedish).Google Scholar
  15. Eriksson Å. and Eriksson O. 1997. Seedling recruitment in semi-natural pastures: the effects of disturbance, seed size, phenology and seed bank. Nordic Journal of Botany 17: 469-482.Google Scholar
  16. Eriksson Å. and Eriksson O. 2000. Population dynamics of the perennial Plantago media in semi-natural grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 245-252.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson Å., Eriksson O. and Berglund H. 1995. Species abundance patterns of plants in Swedish semi-natural pastures. Ecography 18: 310-317.Google Scholar
  18. Eriksson O. 1989. Seedling dynamics of life histories in clonal plants. Oikos 55: 231-238.Google Scholar
  19. Eriksson O. 1994. Stochastic population dynamics of clonal plants: numerical experiments with ramet and genet models. Ecological Research 9: 257-268.Google Scholar
  20. Eriksson O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77: 248-258.Google Scholar
  21. Eriksson O. and Ehrlén J. 1992. Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91: 360-364.Google Scholar
  22. Eriksson O. and Kiviniemi K. 1999. Site occupancy, recruitment and extinction tresholds in grassland plants: an experimental study. Biological Conservation 87: 319-325.Google Scholar
  23. Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G. and Hunt R. 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  24. Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. 1997. Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  25. Harper J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  26. Horwitz C. and Schemske D.W. 1995. Spatiotemporal variation in demographic transitions of a tropical understory herb: projection matrix analysis. Ecological Monographs 65: 155-192.Google Scholar
  27. Horwitz C., Schemske D.W. and Caswell H. 1997. The relative “importance” of life-history stages to population growth: prospective and retrospective analyses. In: Tuljapurkar S. and Caswell H. (eds), Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 247-271.Google Scholar
  28. Husband B.C. and Barrett S.C.H. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. Journal of Ecology 84: 461-469.Google Scholar
  29. Husband B.C. and Barrett S.C.H. 1998. Spatial and temporal variation in population size of Eichornia paniculata in ephemeral habitats: implications for metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Ecology 86: 1021-1031.Google Scholar
  30. Ihse M. 1995. Swedish agricultural landscapes-patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos. Landscape and Urban Planning 31: 21-27.Google Scholar
  31. Inghe O. and Tamm C.O. 1985. Survival and flowering of perennial herbs. IV. The behaviour of Hepatica nobilis and Sanicula europea on permanent plots during 1943-1981. Oikos 45: 400-420.Google Scholar
  32. Kiviniemi K. 1996. A study of adhesive seed dispersal under natural conditions. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 73-83.Google Scholar
  33. Kiviniemi K. and Telenius A. 1998. Experiments on adhesive dispersal by wood mouse: seed shadows and dispersal distances of 13 plant species from cultivated areas in southern Sweden. Ecography 21: 108-116.Google Scholar
  34. Kiviniemi K. and Eriksson O. 1999. Dispersal, recruitment and site occupancy of grassland plants in fragmented habitats. Oikos 86: 241-253.Google Scholar
  35. Lid J. and Lid D.T. 1994. Norsk flora. Det Norska Samlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  36. Menges E.S. 1990. Population viability analysis for an endangered plant. Conservation Biology 4: 52-62.Google Scholar
  37. Menges E.S. 1998. Evaluating extinction risks in plant populations. In: Fiedler P.L. and Kareiva P.M. (eds), Conservation Biology for the Coming Decade. 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 49-65.Google Scholar
  38. Menges E.S. 2000. Population viability analyses in plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 51-56.Google Scholar
  39. Menges E.S. and Dolan R.W. 1998. Demographic viability of populations of Silene regia in midwestern prairies: relationships with fire managements, genetic variation, geographic location, population size and isolation. Journal of Ecology 86: 63-78.Google Scholar
  40. Meyer A.H. and Schmid B. 1999a. Seed dynamics and seedling establishment in the invading perennial Solidago altissima under different experimental treatments. Journal of Ecology 87: 28-41.Google Scholar
  41. Meyer A.H. and Schmid B. 1999b. Experimental demography of rhizome populations of establishing clones of Solidago altissima. Journal of Ecology 87: 42-54.Google Scholar
  42. Milberg P. and Persson T. 1994. Soil seed bank and species recruitment in road verge grassland vegetation. Annales Botanici Fennici 31: 155-162.Google Scholar
  43. Nantel P., Gagnon D. and Andrée N. 1996. Population viability analysis of American ginseng and wild leek harvested in stochastic environments. Conservation Biology 10: 608-621.Google Scholar
  44. Nunney L. and Campbell K.A. 1993. Assessing minimum viable Population Size: Demography Meets Population Genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 234-239.Google Scholar
  45. Oostermeijer J.G.B., Brugman M.L., De Boer E.R. and Den Nijs H.C.M. 1996. Temporal and spatial variation in the demography of Gentiana pneumonanthe, a rare perennial herb. Journal of Ecology 84: 153-166.Google Scholar
  46. Ouborg N.J. 1993. Isolation, population size and extinction: the classical and metapopulation approaches applied to vascular plants along the Dutch Rhine-system. Oikos 66: 298-308.Google Scholar
  47. Overton J, McC. 1994. Dispersal and infection in mistletoe metapopulations. Journal of Ecology 82: 933-950.Google Scholar
  48. Primack R.B. and Miao S.L. 1992. Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Conservation Biology 6: 513-519.Google Scholar
  49. Quinn R.M., Lawton J.R., Eversham B.C. and Wood S.N. 1994. The biography of scarce vascular plants in Britain with respect to habitat preference, dispersal ability and reproductive biology. Biological Conservation 70: 149-157.Google Scholar
  50. Schemske D.W., Husband B.C., Ruckelhaus M.H., Goodwillie C., Parker I.M. and Bishop J.G. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75: 584-606.Google Scholar
  51. Silvertown J., Franco M., Pisanty I. and Mendoza A. 1993. Comparative plant demography-relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology 81: 465-476.Google Scholar
  52. Silvertown J., Franco M. and Menges E. 1996. Interpretation of elasticity matrices as an aid to the management of plant populations for conservation. Conservation Biology 10: 591-597.Google Scholar
  53. Soulé M.E. 1987. Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor K. 1997. Geum rivale L. Journal of Ecology 85: 721-731.Google Scholar
  55. Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L. and Nowak M.A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65-66.Google Scholar
  56. Valverde T. and Silvertown J. 1997a. An integrated model of demography, patch dynamics and seed dispersal in a woodland herb, Primula veris. Oikos 80: 67-77.Google Scholar
  57. Valverde T. and Silvertown J. 1997b. A metapopulation model for Primula veris, a temperate forest understory herb. Journal of Ecology 85: 193-210.Google Scholar
  58. van der Meijden E., Klinkhamer P.G.L., De Jong T.J. and Van Wijk C.A.M. 1992. Meta-population dynamics of biennial plants: how to exploit temporary habitats. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 41: 249-270.Google Scholar
  59. van Dorp D. 1996. Seed dispersal in agricultural habitats and the restoration of species-rich meadows.Google Scholar
  60. Venable D.L. and Brown J.S. 1993. The population-dynamic functions of seed dispersal. Vegetatio 107/108: 31-55.Google Scholar
  61. Verkaar H.J. 1990. Corridors as a tool for plant species conservation? In: Bunce R.G.H. and Howard D.C. (eds), Species Dispersal in Agricultural Habitats. Belhaven Press, London, pp. 82-97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katariina Kivi­niemi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations