Advertisement

Journal of Mathematical Chemistry

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 17–63 | Cite as

Some Mathematical and Algorithmic Challenges in the Control of Quantum Dynamics Phenomena

  • E. Brown
  • H. Rabitz
Article

Abstract

The theory and practice of control over quantum mechanical phenomena is receiving increasing attention, underscored by striking experimental successes. Nevertheless, many questions of fundamental and practical relevance to the field remain unresolved. With the aim of stimulating further development, this paper formulates a number of theoretical questions, divided into three categories. First, questions related to control law design are discussed, with an emphasis on controllability and optimal control theory. This leads to the second category of open problems relevant to closed loop laboratory implementation of quantum control, including learning and feedback methods. The sensitive dependence of control on basic quantum mechanical interactions motivates the third section, which treats coherent dynamical techniques for identifying the system Hamiltonian. An open issue overarching all of these directions is the need to discover general rules for the control of quantum systems. Although the list of issues raised in this paper is extensive, it should be viewed not as a complete menu for exploration, but rather as a springboard to new challenges as the field evolves.

quantum control theory quantum dynamics inverse problems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Assion et al., Control of chemical reactions by feedback-optimized phase-shaped femtosecond laser pulses, Science 282 (1998) 919–922.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Bergt et al., Controlling the femtochemistry of Fe(CO)5, J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 10381–10387.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.J. Levis, G.M. Menkir and H. Rabitz, Selective bond dissociation and rearrangement with optimally tailored, strong-field laser pulses, Science 292 (2001) 709–713.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T.C. Weinacht, J. Ahn and P.H. Bucksbaum, Controlling the shape of a quantum wavefunction, Nature 397 (1999) 233–235.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Bardeen et al., Feedback quantum control of molecular electronic population transfer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 280 (1997) 151–158.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Bardeen et al., Quantum control of population transfer in green flourescent protein by using chirped femtosecond pulses, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 13023–13027.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Bartels et al., Shaped-pulse optimization of coherent emission of high-harmonic soft X-rays, Nature 406 (2000) 164–166.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Rice and M. Zhao, Optical Control of Quantum Dynamics (Wiley, 2000). Many additional references to the subjects of this paper may also be found here.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    W.S.Warren, H. Rabitz and M. Dahleh, Coherent control of quantum dynamics: The dream is alive, Science 259 (1993) 1581–1589.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Rabitz et al.,Wither the future of controlling quantum phenomena?, Science 288 (2000) 824–828.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. Rabitz, Control of microworld chemical and physical processes, in: eds. P.v.R. Schleyer et al., Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry (Wiley, 1998) pp. 573–580.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    N. Bloembergen and A.H. Zewail, Energy redistribution in isolated molecules and the question of mode-selective laser chemistry revisited, J. Phys. Chem. 23 (1984) 5459–5465.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A.S. Sudbø et al., Simple bond rupture reactions in multi-photon dissociation of molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 70 (1979) 912–929.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J.M. Jasinski, J.K. Frisoli and C.B. Moore, Unimolecular reactions induced by vibrational overtone excitation, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 75 (1983) 289–299.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, Coherent chemistry: Controlling chemical reactions with lasers, Acc. Chem. Res. 22 (1989) 407.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Peirce, M. Dahleh and H. Rabitz, Optimal control of quantum mechanical systems: Existence, numerical approximations, and applications, Phys. Rev. A 37 (1988) 4950–4964.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Shi, A. Woody and H. Rabitz, Optimal control of selective vibrational excitation in harmonic linear chain molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 88 (1988) 6870–6883.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M.J. Davis and E.J. Heller, Comparisons of classical and quantum dynamics for initially localized states, J. Chem. Phys. 80 (1984) 5036–5048. This and the following three references are from the list given in note 18 of [105].Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    K.C. Kulander and A.E. Orel, Laser-collision induced chemical-reactions-a comparison of quantum-mechanical and classical-model results, J. Chem. Phys. 75 (1981) 675–680.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. Leforestier, Competition between dissociation and exchange processes in a collinear A + BC collision-comparison of quantum and classical results, Chem. Phys. Lett. 125 (1986) 373–377.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    P.S. Dardi and S.K. Gray, Classical and quantum-mechanical studies of HF in an intense laser field, J. Chem. Phys. 77 (1982) 1345–1353.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    E. Sontag, Mathematical Control Theory (Springer, 1998).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. Brockett, Finite Dimensional Linear Systems (Wiley, 1970).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    T. Kailath, Linear Systems (Prentice Hall, 1980).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems (Macmillan, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    H. Nijmeiher and A. van der Schaft, Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems (Springer, 1990).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    V. Blondel, E. Sontag and J. Willems (eds.), Open Problems in Mathematical Systems and Control Theory (Springer, 1999).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    G. Huang, T. Tarn and J. Clark, On the controllability of quantum-mechanical systems, J. Math. Phys. 24 (1983) 2608–2618.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    R.S. Judson et al., Optimal design of external fields for controlling molecular motion-application to rotation, J. Mol. Struct. 223 (1990) 425–456.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    V. Ramakrishna et al., Controllability of molecular systems, Phys. Rev. A 51 (1995) 960–966.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    G. Turinici, On the controllability of bilinear quantum systems, in: eds. M. Defranceschi and C. Le-Bris, Mathematical Models and Methods for Ab Initio Quantum Chemistry, Lecture Notes in Chemistry, Vol. 74 (Springer, 2000).Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    G. Turinici and H. Rabitz, Quantum wavefunction control, Chem. Phys. 267 (2001) 1–9.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    G. Turinici and H. Rabitz,Wavefunction controllability in quantum systems, J. Math. Phys. (submitted).Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    M.D. Girardeau et al., Kinematical bounds on optimization of observables for quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 2684–2689.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    M.D. Girardeau et al., Kinematical bounds on evolution and optimization of mixed quantum states, Phys. Rev. A. 55 (1997) R1565–R1568Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    [36] M. Reed and B. Simon, Functional Analysis (Academic Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    J.G.B. Beumee and H. Rabitz, Robust optimal control theory for selective vibrational excitation in molecules: A worst case analysis, J. Chem. Phys. 97 (1992) 1353–1364.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    A. Bartana and R. Kosloff, Laser cooling of molecular internal degrees of freedom by a series of shaped pulses, J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 196–210.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Baratana and R. Kosloff, Laser cooling and internal degrees of freedom II, J. Chem. Phys. 106 (1997) 1435–1448.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    D. Tannor and A. Bartana, On the interplay of control fields and spontaneous emission in laser cooling, J. Chem. Phys. A 103 (1999) 10359–10363.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    D. Tannor, R. Kosloff and A. Bartana, Laser cooling of internal degrees of freedom of molecules by dynamically trapped states, Faraday Discuss. 113 (1999) 365–383.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    L. Shen et al., Optimal control of the electric susceptibility of a molecular gas by designed nonresonant laser pulses of limited amplitude, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 7792–7803.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    H. Xia et al., Electromagnetically induced transparency in atoms with hyperfine structure, Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997) R3362–R3365.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    N. Christofides, Graph Theory: An Algorithmic Approach (Academic Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    G. Harel and V.M. Akulin, Complete control of Hamiltonian quantum systems: Engineering of Floquet evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1–5.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    V. Ramakrishna et al., Explicit generation of unitary transformations in a single atom or molecule, Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 032106–1–032106–6.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    R. Sepulchre, M. Jankovic and P. Kokotovic, Constructive Nonlinear Control (Springer, 1998).Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    D. Luenberger, Introduction to Dynamic Systems: Theory, Models, and Applications (Wiley, 1979).Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    R. Mohler, Bilinear Control Processes (Academic Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    A. Peirce, M. Dahleh and H. Rabitz, Optimal control of quantum mechanical systems: Existence, numerical approximations, and applications, Phys. Rev. A 37 (1988) 4950–4964.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    M. Zhao and S. Rice, Optimal control of product selectivity in reactions of polyatomic molecules: A reduced-space analysis, in: ed. J. Hepburn, Laser Techniques for State-Selected and State-to-Chemistry, II, SPIE 2124 (1994) p. 246.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    F. Brown and R. Sibley, Quantum control for arbitrary linear and quadratic potentials, Chem. Phys. Lett. 292 (1998) 357–368.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    S. Shah and S. Rice, Controlling quantum wavepacket motion in reduced-dimensional spaces: Reaction path analysis in optimal control of HCN isomerization, Faraday Discuss. 113 (1999) 319–331.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    K. Mishima and K. Yamashita, Theoretical study on quantum control of photodissociation and photodesorption dynamics by femtosecond chirped laser pulses, J. Chem. Phys. 110 (1999) 7756–7769.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    K. Hoki et al., Quantum control of NaI predissociation in subpicosecond and several-picosecond time regimes, J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 6301–6308.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    L. de Araujo and I. Walmsley, Quantum control of molecuar wavepackets: An approximate analytic solution for the strong-response regime, J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 10409–10416.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    K. Mishima and K. Yamashita, Quantum control of photodissociation wavepackets, J. Mol. Struct. 461–462 (1999) 483–491.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    J. Cao and K.Wilson, A simple physical picture for the quantum control of wave packet localization, J. Chem. Phys. 107 (1997) 1441–1450.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    C. Bardeen et al., Quantum control of NaI photodissociation reaction product states by ultrafast tailored light pulses, J. Phys. Chem. A 101 (1997) 3815–3822.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    C. Bardeen et al., Quantum control of I2 in the gas phase and in condensed phase solid Kr matrix, J. Chem. Phys. 106 (1997) 8486–8503.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    G. Agarwal, Nature of the quantum interference in electromagnetic-field-induced control of absorption, Phys. Rev. A 55 (1997) 2467–2470.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    M. Grønager and N. Henriksen, Real-time control of electronic motion: Application to NaI, J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 4335–4341.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    D. Meshulach and Y. Silberberg, Coherent quantum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse, Nature 396 (1998) 239–241.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    I. Pastirk et al., Quantum control of the yield of a chemical reaction, J. Chem. Phys. 108 (1998) 4375–4378.Google Scholar
  65. [65]
    J.M. Geremia, W.S. Zhu and H. Rabitz, Incorporating physical implementation concerns into closed loop quantum control experiments, J. Chem. Phys. 113 (2000) 10841–10848.Google Scholar
  66. [66]
    S. Tersigni and S. Rice, On using shaped light-pulses to control the selectivity of product formation in a chemical-reaction-an application to a multiple level system, J. Chem. Phys. 93 (1990) 1670–1680.Google Scholar
  67. [67]
    J. Krause and K. Schafer, Control of THz emission from Stark wave packets, J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 10118–10125.Google Scholar
  68. [68]
    J. Krause et al., Quantum control in quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998) 9024–9034.Google Scholar
  69. [69]
    S. Shi and H. Rabitz, Quantum mechanical optimal control of physical observables in microsystems, J. Chem. Phys. 92 (1990) 364–376.Google Scholar
  70. [70]
    M. Demiralp and H. Rabitz, Optimally controlled quantum molecular dynamics: A perturbation formulation and the existence of multiple solutions, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 809–816.Google Scholar
  71. [71]
    W. Zhu, J. Botina and H. Rabitz, Rapidly convergent iteration methods for quantum optimal control of population, J. Chem. Phys. 108 (1998) 1953–1963.Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    W. Zhu and H. Rabitz, Uniform rapidly convergent algorithm for quantum optimal control of objectives with a positive semi-definite Hessian matrix, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 4741–4748.Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Y. Ohtsuki, W. Zhu and H. Rabitz, Monotonically convergent algorithm for quantum optimal control with dissipation, J. Chem. Phys. 110 (1999) 9825–9832.Google Scholar
  74. [74]
    M. Ablowitz, B. Fuchssteiner and M. Kruskal (eds.), Topics in Soliton Theory and Exactly Solvable Nonlinear Equations: Proceedings of the Conference on Nonlinear Evolution Equations, Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform, Oberwolfach, Germany (July 27–August 2, 1986).Google Scholar
  75. [75]
    G.L. Lamb, Jr., Elements of Soliton Theory (Wiley, 1980).Google Scholar
  76. [76]
    P.G. Drazin and R.S. Johnson, Solitions: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  77. [77]
    M. Demiralp and H. Rabitz, Dispersion-free wavepackets and feedback solitonic motion in controlled quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 55 (1997) 673–677.Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    L. Gammaitoni, Stochastic resonance, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 (1998) 223–287.Google Scholar
  79. [79]
    P. Dorato (ed.), Robust Control, IEEE Selected Reprint Series (IEEE Press, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
  80. [80]
    S. Hosoe (ed.), Robust Control, Proceedings of a Workshop, Tokyo, Japan, June 23–24, 1991 (Springer, 1991).Google Scholar
  81. [81]
    J. Ackerman (ed.), Uncertainty and Control, Proceedings of an International Seminar, Bonn, Germany, May 1985 (Springer, 1985).Google Scholar
  82. [82]
    M. Demiralp and H. Rabitz, Assessing optimality and robustness of control over quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. A (1998) 2420–2425.Google Scholar
  83. [83]
    M. Kobayashi, Mathematics makes molecules dance, SIAM News (November, 1998).Google Scholar
  84. [84]
    J.G.B. Beumee, C.D. Schwieters and H. Rabitz, Optical control of molecular motion with robustness and application to vinylidene fluoride, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B (1990) 1736–1747.Google Scholar
  85. [85]
    M. Athans and P.L. Falb, Optimal Control (McGraw-Hill, 1966).Google Scholar
  86. [86]
    H. Zhang and H. Rabitz, Robust optimal control of quantum molecular systems in the presence of disturbances and uncertainties, Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 2241–2254.Google Scholar
  87. [87]
    I.L. Chuang et al., Quantum computers, factoring, and decoherence, Science 270 (1995) 1633–1635.Google Scholar
  88. [88]
    P. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) R2493–R2496.Google Scholar
  89. [89]
    A.M. Steane, Introduction to quantum error correction, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 356 (1998) 1739–1758.Google Scholar
  90. [90]
    D.A. Lidar, I.L. Chuang and K.B. Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 2594–2597.Google Scholar
  91. [91]
    D.A. Lidar, D. Bacon and K.B. Whaley, Concatenating decoherence-free subspaces with quantum error correcting codes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4556–4559.Google Scholar
  92. [92]
    D. Bacon, D.A. Lidar and K.B.Whaley, Robustness of decohrence-free subspaces for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 60 (1999) 1944–1955.Google Scholar
  93. [93]
    C. Brif et al., Decoherence of molecular vibrational wave packets: Observable manifestations and control criteria, Phys. Rev. A 63 (2001), 063404–1–063404–9.Google Scholar
  94. [94]
    L. Viola and S. Lloyd, Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 2733–2744.Google Scholar
  95. [95]
    D. Vitali and P. Tombesi, Using parity kicks for decoherence control, Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 4178–4185.Google Scholar
  96. [96]
    J. Cao, M. Messina and K.Wilson, Quantum control of dissipative systems: exact solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 106 (1997) 5239–5248.Google Scholar
  97. [97]
    L. Duan and G. Guo, Suppressing environmental noise in quantum computation through pulse control, Phys. Lett. A 261 (1999) 139–144.Google Scholar
  98. [98]
    C. Bardeen et al., Using time-dependent rate equations to describe chirped pulse excitation in condensed phases, Chem. Phys. Lett. 302 (1999) 405–410.Google Scholar
  99. [99]
    P. Gross et al., Inverse quantum-mechanical control: A means for design and a test of intuition, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 4593–4603.Google Scholar
  100. [100]
    Z.-M. Lu and H. Rabitz, Unified formulation for control and inversion of molecular dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 13731–13735.Google Scholar
  101. [101]
    Y. Ohtsuki, H. Kono and Y. Fujimura, Quantum control of nuclear wave packets by locally designed optimal pulses, J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 9318–9331.Google Scholar
  102. [102]
    C. Ong et al., Invertability of quantum-mechanical control systems, Math. Systems Theory 17 (1984) 335–350.Google Scholar
  103. [103]
    W. Zhu, M. Smit and H. Rabitz, Managing dynamical singular behavior in the tracking control of quantum observables, J. Chem. Phys. (1999) 1905–1915.Google Scholar
  104. [104]
    Y. Chen et al., Competitive tracking of molecular objectives described by quantum mechanics, J. Chem. Phys. (1995) 8001–8010.Google Scholar
  105. [105]
    C.D. Schwieters and H. Rabitz, Optimal control of classical systems with explicit quantum/classical difference reduction, Phys. Rev. A 48 (1993) 2549–2557.Google Scholar
  106. [106]
    C.D. Schwieters and H. Rabitz, Designing time-independent classically equivalent potentials to reduce quantum/classical observable differences using optimal control theory (to be published).Google Scholar
  107. [107]
    R.S. Judson and H. Rabitz, Teaching lasers to control molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 1500.Google Scholar
  108. [108]
    D. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989).Google Scholar
  109. [109]
    T. Hornung, R. Meier and M. Motzkus, Optimal control of molecular states in a learning loop with a parameterization in frequency and time domain, Chem. Phys. Lett. 326 (2000) 445–453.Google Scholar
  110. [110]
    J. Kunde et al., Adaptive feedback control of ultrafast semiconductor nonlinearities, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 (2000) 924.Google Scholar
  111. [111]
    P. Gross, D. Neuhauser and H. Rabitz, Teaching lasers to control molecules in the presence of laboratory field uncertainty and measurement imprecision, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 4557–4566.Google Scholar
  112. [112]
    G.J. Tóth, A. Lörincz and H. Rabitz, The effect of control field and measurement imprecision on laboratory feedback control of quantum systems, J. Chem. Phys. 101 (1994) 3715–3722.Google Scholar
  113. [113]
    M.Q. Phan and H. Rabitz, Learning control of quantum-mechanical systems by laboratory identification of effective input-output maps, Chem. Phys. 217 (1997) 389–400.Google Scholar
  114. [114]
    M.Q. Phan and H. Rabitz, A self-guided algorithm for learning control of quantum-mechanical systems, J. Chem. Phys. 110 (1999) 34–41.Google Scholar
  115. [115]
    J.M. Geremia, E. Weiss and H. Rabitz, Achieving the laboratory control of quantum dynamics phenomena using nonlinear functional maps, Chem. Phys. 267 (2001) 209–222.Google Scholar
  116. [116]
    J.J. Sotine and W. Li, Applied Nonlinear Control (Prentice Hall, 1991).Google Scholar
  117. [117]
    M. Carmichael, Master Equations and Fokker-Plank Equations (Springer, 1999).Google Scholar
  118. [118]
    M. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer, 1999).Google Scholar
  119. [119]
    H.M. Wiseman and G.J. Milburn, Quantum-theory of optical feedback via homodyne detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 548–551.Google Scholar
  120. [120]
    H.M. Wiseman and G.J. Milburn, Quantum-theory of field-quadrature measurements, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 622–643.Google Scholar
  121. [121]
    V.B. Braginsky and F.Y. Khalili, Quantum Measurement (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  122. [122]
    H.M. Wiseman, Quantum theory of continuous feedback, Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 2133–2150.Google Scholar
  123. [123]
    H.M. Wiseman, Stochastic quantum dynamics of a continuously monitored laser, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 5180–5192.Google Scholar
  124. [124]
    H. Hoffman et al., Quantum control of atomic systems by homodyne detection and feedback, Phys. Rev. A 57 (1998) 4877–4888.Google Scholar
  125. [125]
    H. Hofmann, O. Hess and G. Mahler, Quantum control by compensation of quantum fluctuations, Optics Express 2 (1998) 339–346.Google Scholar
  126. [126]
    H. Carmichael, Stochastic Schrödinger equations: What they mean and what they can do, in: eds. J. Eberly, L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Coherence and Quantum Optics VII (Plenum, 1996) p. 77.Google Scholar
  127. [127]
    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, 1997).Google Scholar
  128. [128]
    P. Billingsley, Probability and Measure (Wiley, 1979).Google Scholar
  129. [129]
    M. Fink, Time reversed acoustics, Scientific American (November 1999) 91–97.Google Scholar
  130. [130]
    M. Fink and W. Arnold, Ultrasonic focusing with time-reversal mirrors, in: eds. A. Briggs and W. Arnold, Advances in Acoustic Microscopy Series (Plenum, 1996).Google Scholar
  131. [131]
    J. Krause et al., Creating and detecting shaped Rydberg wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 4978–4981.Google Scholar
  132. [132]
    W. Zhu and H. Rabitz, Potential surfaces from the inversion of time dependent probability density data, J. Chem. Phys. 111 (1999) 472–480.Google Scholar
  133. [133]
    M. Bargheer et al., Extraction of potentials and dynamics from condensed phase pump-probe spectra: Application to I2 in Kr matrices, J. Chem. Phys. 111 (1999) 8556–8564.Google Scholar
  134. [134]
    H. Rabitz and S. Shi, Optimal control of molecular motion: Making molecules dance, in: ed. J. Bowman, Advances in Molecular Vibrations and Collision Dynamics, Vol. 1, Part A (JAI Press, 1991) pp. 187–214.Google Scholar
  135. [135]
    H. Rabitz and W. Zhu, Optimal control of molecular motion: Design, implementation, and inversion, Acc. Chem. Res. 33 (2000) 572–578.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Brown
    • 1
  • H. Rabitz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Program in Applied and Computational MathematicsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Frick LaboratoryPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations