Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 553–564 | Cite as

Job-content Perceptions, Performance–reward Expectancies, and Absenteeism among Low-wage Public-sector Clerical Employees

  • Robert R. Hirschfeld
  • Leigh P. Schmitt
  • Arthur G. Bedeian
Article

Abstract

This study explored relations of job-content perceptions (i.e., skill variety and task significance), and performance–reward expectancies, with absenteeism among 134 low-wage public-sector clerical employees. Results indicated that those employees who perceived limited performance–reward expectancies (i.e., lower instrumentality), and who considered their jobs to be either higher on skill variety or task significance, were likely to be absent more often. Moreover, the link between skill variety and absenteeism was moderated by instrumentality in a manner suggesting that respondents may have utilized absenteeism as a means of compensating for perceived workplace contributions not extrinsically rewarded. These findings further suggest that employees in occupational settings for which performance-related extrinsic rewards are less available may not respond to favorable job-content perceptions in the positive manner generally predicted by job characteristics theory.

absenteeism job characteristics performance–reward expectancy clerical 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., & Shapiro, D. (1996). Racial differences in access to high-paying jobs and the wage gap between black and white women. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 49, 273–286.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Dalton, D. R., & Perry, J. L. (1981). Absenteeism and the collective bargaining agreement: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 425–431.Google Scholar
  6. Doran, L. I., Stone, V. K., Brief, A. P., & George, J. M. (1991). Behavioral intentions as predictors of job attitudes: The role of economic choice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 40–45.Google Scholar
  7. Farrell, D., & Stamm, C. L. (1988). Meta-analysis of the correlates of employee absence. Human Relations, 41, 211–227.Google Scholar
  8. Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322.Google Scholar
  9. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation and the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 250–279.Google Scholar
  10. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Hackman, J. R., Pearce, J. L., & Wolfe, J. C. (1978). Effects of changes in job characteristics on work attitudes and behavior: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 289–304.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, D. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1989). Investigations of absenteeism: Using event history models to study the absence-taking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 300–316.Google Scholar
  13. Harrison, D. A., & Martocchio, J. J. (1998). Time for absenteeism: A 20-year review of origins, offshoots, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 24, 305–350.Google Scholar
  14. Johns, G. (1978). Attitudinal and nonattitudinal predictors of two forms of absence from work. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 431–444.Google Scholar
  15. Johns, G., & Nicholson, N. (1982). The meanings of absence: New strategies for theory and research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 127–172.Google Scholar
  16. Kemery, E. R., Bedeian, A. G., & Zacur, S. (1996). Expectancy-based job cognitions and job affect as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 635–651.Google Scholar
  17. Locke, E. A., Sirota, D., & Wolfson, A. D. (1976). An experimental case study of the successes and failures of job enrichment in a government agency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 701–711.Google Scholar
  18. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious “moderator effects”: Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized (“synergistic”) relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385–393.Google Scholar
  19. MacCallum, R. C., & Mar, C. M. (1995). Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 405–421.Google Scholar
  20. Martocchio, J. J. (1994). The effects of absence culture on individual absence. Human Relations, 47, 243–262.Google Scholar
  21. Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1994). A policy-capturing approach to individuals' decisions to be absent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 358–386.Google Scholar
  22. Nicholson, J., & Johns, G. (1985). The absence culture and the psychological contract—Who's in control of absence? Academy of Management Review, 10, 397–407.Google Scholar
  23. Rentsch, J. R., & Steel, R. P. (1998). Testing the durability of job characteristics as predictors of absenteeism over a six-year period. Personnel Psychology, 51, 165–190.Google Scholar
  24. Rush, M. C., Schoel, W. A., & Barnard, S. M. (1995). Psychological resiliency in the public sector: “Hardiness” and pressure for change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 17–39.Google Scholar
  25. Sauley, K. S., & Bedeian, A. G. (2000). Equity sensitivity: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26, 885–910.Google Scholar
  26. Schmitz, S., Williams, D. R., & Gabriel, P. E. (1994). An empirical examination of racial and gender differences in wage distributions. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 34, 227–239.Google Scholar
  27. Schwab, D. P. (1991). Contextual variables in employee performance-turnover relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 966–975.Google Scholar
  28. Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., & Keller, R. T. (1976). The measurement of job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 195–211.Google Scholar
  29. Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., & McKemey, D. R. (1976). Antecedents of work-related expectancies. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 547–559.Google Scholar
  30. Sturman, M. C. (1999). Multiple approaches to analyzing count data in studies of individual differences: The propensity for Type I errors, illustrated with the case of absenteeism prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 414–430.Google Scholar
  31. Taber, T. D., & Taylor, E. (1990). A review and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Personnel Psychology, 43, 467–497.Google Scholar
  32. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1999). Meta-analysis of bidirectional relations in personality-job performance research. Human Performance, 12, 1–29.Google Scholar
  33. Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). The gender and race composition of jobs and male/female, white/black pay gaps. Social Forces, 72, 45–76.Google Scholar
  34. Van Yperen, N. W., Hagedoorn, M., & Geurts, S. A. E. (1996). Intent to leave and absenteeism as reactions to perceived inequity: The role of psychological and social constraints. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 367–372.Google Scholar
  35. Winkler, D. R. (1980). The effects of sick-leave policy on teacher absenteeism. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 33, 232–240.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Hirschfeld
    • 1
  • Leigh P. Schmitt
    • 2
  • Arthur G. Bedeian
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management, Terry College of BusinessUniversity of GeorgiaAthens
  2. 2.University of New OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Louisiana State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations