Advertisement

Real-Time Systems

, Volume 23, Issue 1–2, pp 85–126 | Cite as

Feedback Control Real-Time Scheduling: Framework, Modeling, and Algorithms*

  • Chenyang Lu
  • John A. Stankovic
  • Sang H. Son
  • Gang Tao
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a feedback control real-time scheduling (FCS) framework for adaptive real-time systems. An advantage of the FCS framework is its use of feedback control theory (rather than ad hoc solutions) as a scientific underpinning. We apply a control theory based methodology to systematically design FCS algorithms to satisfy the transient and steady state performance specifications of real-time systems. In particular, we establish dynamic models of real-time systems and develop performance analyses of FCS algorithms, which are major challenges and key steps for the design of control theory based adaptive real-time systems. We also present a FCS architecture that allows plug-ins of different real-time scheduling policies and QoS optimization algorithms. Based on our framework, we identify different categories of real-time applications where different FCS algorithms should be applied. Performance evaluation results demonstrate that our analytically tuned FCS algorithms provide robust transient and steady state performance guarantees for periodic and aperiodic tasks even when the task execution times vary by as much as 100% from the initial estimate.

real-time scheduling feedback control Quality of Service modeling unpredictable environment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Abdelzaher, T. F., and Lu, C. 2001. Schedulability analysis and utilization bounds for highly scalable real-time services. In IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium. Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  2. Abdelzaher, T. F. 2000. An automated profiling subsystem for QoS-aware services. In IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Abdelzaher, T. F., Atkins, E. M., and Shin, K. G. 1997. QoS negotiation in real-time systems and its application to automatic flight control. In IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium.Google Scholar
  4. Abdelzaher, T. F., and Bhatti, N. 1999. Web server QoS management by adaptive content delivery. In International Workshop on Quality of Service.Google Scholar
  5. Abdelzaher, T. F., and Lu, C. 2000. Modeling and performance control of internet servers. In 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Abdelzaher, T. F., and Shin, K. G. 1998. End-host Architecture for QoS-adaptive communication. In IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  7. Abdelzaher, T. F., and Shin, K. G. 1999. QoS provisioning with qContracts in web and multimedia Servers. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium. Phoenix, Arizona, pp. 44-53.Google Scholar
  8. Brandt, S., and Nutt, G. 1998. A dynamic quality of service middleware agent for mediating application resource usage. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.Google Scholar
  9. Buttazzo, G., Lipari, G., and Abeni, L. 1998. Elastic task model for adaptive rate control. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium. Madrid, Spain, pp. 286-295.Google Scholar
  10. Caccamo, M., Buttazzo, G., and Sha, L. 2000. Capacity sharing for overrun control. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium. Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  11. Eker, J. 1999. Flexible embedded control systems-design and implementation. Ph.D. thesis, Lund Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  12. Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., and Workman, M. L. 1998. Digital Control of Dynamic Systems (3rd Edn). Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Hollot, C. V., Misra, V., Towsley, D., and Gong, W. 2001. A control theoretic analysis of RED. In IEEE INFOCOM. Anchorage, Alaska.Google Scholar
  14. Klein, M., Ralya, T., Pollak, B., Obenza, R., and Harbour, M. G. 1993. A Practitioner's Handbook for Real-Time Analysis — Guide to Rate Monotonic Analysis for Real-Time Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, C., Lehoczky, J., Siewiorek, D., Rajkumar, R., and Hansen, J. 1999. A scalable solution to the multi-resource QoS problem. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium. Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  16. Lehoczky, J. P., Sha, L., and Ding, Y. 1989. The rate monotonic scheduling algorithm — exact characterization and average case behavior. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.Google Scholar
  17. Li, B., and Nahrstedt, K. 1999. A control-based middleware framework for quality of service adaptations. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, Special Issue on Service Enabling Platforms 17(9): 1632-1650.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, C. L., and Layland, J. W. 1973. Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard real-time environment. Journal of ACM 20(1): 46-61.Google Scholar
  19. Liu, J. W. S., Lin, K.-J., Shih, W.-K., Yu, A. C.-S., Chung, J.-Y., and Zhao, W. 1991. Algorithms for scheduling imprecise computations. IEEE Computer 24(5): 58-68.Google Scholar
  20. Lu, C., Abdelzaher, T. F., Stankovic, J. A., and Son, S. H. 2001. A feedback control approach for guaranteeing relative delays in web servers. In IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium. Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  21. Lu, C., Stankovic, J. A., Abdelzaher, T. F., Tao, G., Son, S. H., and Marley, M. 2000. Performance specifications and metrics for adaptive real-time systems. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  22. Lu, C., Stankovic, J. A., Tao, G., and Son, S. H. 1999. Design and evaluation of a feedback control EDF scheduling algorithm. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium. Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  23. Lu, C. 2001. Feedback Control Real-Time Scheduling. Ph.D. Dissertation 2001-6, University of Virginia CS.Google Scholar
  24. Mathworks Inc., http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.Google Scholar
  25. Parekh, S., Gandhi, N., Hellerstein, J. L., Tilbury, D., Jayram, T. S., and Bigus, J. 2001. Using control theory to achieve service level objectives in performance management. In IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management.Google Scholar
  26. Rajkumar, R., Lee, C., Lehoczky, J., and Siewiorek, D. 1998. Practical solutions for QoS-based resource allocation problems. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.Google Scholar
  27. Rosu, D., Schwan, K., Yalamanchili, S., and Jha, R. 1997. On adaptive resource allocation for complex real-time applications. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.Google Scholar
  28. Ryu, M., and Hong, S. 1998. Toward automatic synthesis of schedulable real-time controllers. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 5(3): 261-277.Google Scholar
  29. Skiena, S. S., and Skiena, S. 1997. The Algorithm Design Manual. New York: Telos/Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Son, S. H., Zimmerman, R., and Hansson, J. 2000. An adaptable security manager for real-time transactions. In Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems. Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  31. Stankovic, J. A., Spuri, M., Ramamritham, K., and Buttazzo, G. C. 1998. Deadline Scheduling for Real-Time Systems — EDF and Related Algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Stankovic, J. A., Lu, C., Son, S. H., and Tao, G. 1999. The case for feedback control real-time scheduling. In EuroMicro Conference on Real-Time Systems. York, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Steere, D. C., et al. 1999. A feedback-driven proportion allocator for real-rate Scheduling. Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation.Google Scholar
  34. Zhao, W., Ramamritham, K., and Stankovic, J. A. 1987. Preemptive scheduling under time and resource constraints. IEEE Transactions on Computers 36(8): 949-960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chenyang Lu
    • 1
  • John A. Stankovic
    • 1
  • Sang H. Son
    • 1
  • Gang Tao
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations