Fire Technology

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 68–78

Toward the Characterization of Building Occupancies for Fire Safety Engineering: Capability of Disabled People to Negotiate Doors

  • K. E. Boyce
  • T. J. Shields
  • G. W. H. Silcock

Abstract

This paper is the third in a series of four that collectively provide a substantial body of knowledge on the egress capabilities of people with disabilities. It presents the results of an experimental program to determine the ability of disabled people to negotiate doors with closing forces that range from 20 N to 70 N. The results indicate that many disabled people find it impossible to negotiate doors, even at relatively low closing forces, and that the time it takes disabled people to negotiate doors can vary considerably. The results of this study are presented for the use of those involved in the difficult task of characterizing building occupancies with respect to their egress capabilities.

disabled doors closing forces time required characterization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    British Standards Institution, Draft British Standard Code of Practice, BS DD240 Fire Safety Engineering in Buildings, Part 1: “Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles,” 1997, British Standards Institution, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Private Communication, International Standards Organization Technical Committee TC/92/SC4/W1-W5, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Approved Document M, “Access and Facilities for Disabled People, Department of the Environment and the Welsh Office,” The Building Regulations, 1991, HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    British Standards Institution, BS 6459, “Door Closers Part 1, Specifications of Mechanical Performance of Crank Rack and Pinion Overhead Closers,” British Standards Institution, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Office of Population Census and Surveys, Surveys of Disability in Great Britain, Report 1: “The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults,” HMSO, London, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCoy, D., Smith M., PPRU Surveys of Disability Report 1, “The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults in Northern Ireland,” Policy Planning and Research Unit, Social Policy Branch, N. Ireland, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyce, K. E., “Egress Capabilities of People with Disabilities,” D. Phil Thesis, University of Ulster, December 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boyce, K. E., Shields, T. J., Silcock, G. W. H., “Toward the Characterization of Building Occupancies for Fire Safety Engineering: Capabilities of Disabled People to Moving Horizontally and on an Incline, Fire Technology, Vol. 35, No. 1 (1999), pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyce, K. E., Shields, T. J., Silcock, G. W. H., “Toward the Characterization of Building Occupancies for Fire Safety Engineering: Prevalence, Type and Mobility of Disabled People,” Fire Technology, Vol. 35, No. 1 (1999), pp. 35–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. E. Boyce
    • 1
  • T. J. Shields
    • 1
  • G. W. H. Silcock
    • 1
  1. 1.Fire SertUniversity of UlsterNorthern IrelandU.K.

Personalised recommendations