Average (Recommended) Half-Life Values for Two-Neutrino Double-Beta Decay
Article
- 51 Downloads
- 56 Citations
Abstract
All existing "positive" results on two-neutrino double-beta decay in different nuclei were analyzed. Using procedure recommended by Particle Data Group weighted average values for half-lives of 48Ca, 76Ge, 82Se, 96Zr, 100Mo, 100Mo-100Ru (0+1), 116Cd, 150Nd and 238U were obtained. Existing geochemical data were analyzed and recommended values for half-lives of 128Te and 130Te are proposed. We recommend to use these results as the most precise and reliable values for half-lives at this moment.
radioactivity 48Ca 76Ge 82Se 96Zr 100Mo 116Cd 128Te 130Te 150Nd 238U; double-beta decay
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]M. Gunther et al.: Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 54.Google Scholar
- [2]H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al.: arXiv:hep-ph/0103062 6 Mar 2001.Google Scholar
- [3]D. Dassie et al.: Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 2090.Google Scholar
- [4]A. Balysh et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 5186.Google Scholar
- [5]V.B. Brudanin et al.: Phys. Lett. B 495 (2000) 63.Google Scholar
- [6]A.A. Vasenko et al.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 1299.Google Scholar
- [7]H.S. Miley et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1991) 3092.Google Scholar
- [8]F.T. Avignone et al.: Phys. Lett. B 256 (1991) 559.Google Scholar
- [9]F.T. Avignone: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 32 (1994) 223.Google Scholar
- [10]A. Morales: Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 77 (1999) 335.Google Scholar
- [11]R. Arnold et al.: Nucl. Phys. A 636 (1998) 209.Google Scholar
- [12]S.R. Elliot et al.: Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) 1535.Google Scholar
- [13]T. Kirsten et al.: in Proc. Int. Symp. “Nuclear Beta Decay and Neutrino (Osaka'86)”, (Eds. T. Kotani et al.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1986, p. 81.Google Scholar
- [14]R. Arnold et al.: Nucl. Phys. A 658 (1999) 299.Google Scholar
- [15]A. Kawashima, K. Takahashi, and A. Masuda: Phys. Rev. C 47 (1993) 2452.Google Scholar
- [16]H. Ejiri et al.: Phys. Lett. B 258 (1991) 17.Google Scholar
- [17]S.R. Elliot, A.A. Halin, and M.K. Moe: J. Phys. G 17 (1991) S145.Google Scholar
- [18]M.A lston-Garnjost et al.: Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) 474.Google Scholar
- [19]A. De Silva, M.K. Moe, M.A. Nelson, and M.A. Vient: Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 2451.Google Scholar
- [20]V.D. Ashitkov et al.: in LNGS Annual Report 2000, 2001, p. 39.Google Scholar
- [21]A.S. Barabash et al.: Phys. Lett. B 345 (1995) 408.Google Scholar
- [22]A.S. Barabash et al.: Phys. At. Nucl. 62 (1999) 2039.Google Scholar
- [23]L. De Braeckeleer et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001) 3510.Google Scholar
- [24]H. Ejiri et al.: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64 (1995) 339.Google Scholar
- [25]F.A. Danevich et al.: Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 045501.Google Scholar
- [26]R. Arnold et al.: Z. Phys. C 72 (1996) 239.Google Scholar
- [27]O.K. Manuel: J. Phys. G 17 (1991) 221.Google Scholar
- [28]T. Bernatowicz et al.: Phys. Rev. C 47 (1993) 806.Google Scholar
- [29]V. Artemiev et al.: Phys. Lett. B 345 (1995) 564.Google Scholar
- [30]A.L. Turkevich, T.E. Economou, and G.A. Cowan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 3211.Google Scholar
- [31]Eur. Phys. J. C 15 (2000) 10.Google Scholar
- [32]A.S. Barabash and V.I. Umatov: ITEP note, 1990.Google Scholar
- [33]O.K. Manuel: in Proc. Int. Symp. “Nuclear Beta Decay and Neutrino (Osaka'86)”, (Eds. T. Kotani et al.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1986, p. 71.Google Scholar
- [34]A.S. Barabash: Eur. Phys. J. A 8 (2000) 137.Google Scholar
- [35]S.R. Elliot, A.A. Hahn, and M.K. Moe: Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 2020.Google Scholar
- [36]S.I. Vasilyev et al.: Pis'ma ZhETP 51 (1990) 550.Google Scholar
- [37]N. Takaoka and K.O gata: Z. Naturforsch 21a (1966) 84.Google Scholar
- [38]N. Takaoka, Y. Motomura, and K. Nagano: Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) 1557.Google Scholar
- [39]W.J. Lin et al.: Nucl. Phys. A 457 (1986) 285.Google Scholar
- [40]B.S rinivasan et al.: Econ. Geol. 68 (1973) 252.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic 2002