Advertisement

Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 104, Issue 3, pp 249–276 | Cite as

An Expanded Nystagmus Acuity Function: Intra- and Intersubject Prediction of Best-Corrected Visual Acuity

  • L.F. Dell'Osso
  • J.B. Jacobs
Article

Abstract

The Nystagmus Acuity Function (NAF) provides an objective measurement of the foveation characteristics of nystagmus waveforms and an assessment of potential visual acuity for subjects with congenital (CN) or latent/manifest latent (LMLN) nystagmus. It is based on the subjects' ability to maintain fixation within a physiologically based `foveation window' of ±0.5° and ±4.0°/s. However, some subjects are incapable of controlling fixation well enough to remain within this window with duration sufficient for good foveation. To obtain a measure of the CN waveforms of these individuals, we are proposing an eXpanded Nystagmus Acuity Function (NAFX) that relaxes either the position limit, the velocity limit, or both. Data used in this study comes from 11 human subjects with CN (10 idiopathic and 1 with achiasma) and a Belgian sheepdog with achiasma. Visual acuity was tested with a standard Snellen chart and eye movements recorded with infrared oculography or scleral search coil. For the NAFX to be useful, it must not only be applicable for subjects who cannot maintain fixation within the standard limits of the NAF, but also must yield results equivalent to those obtained with the NAF when testing subjects who are capable of maintaining good fixation control. For the latter subjects, the amount of time when position and velocity fell within the expanded limits was measured, the standard deviations of the position and velocity during these times were calculated, and a τ-surface for the exponential function was generated to guarantee the equivalence between the NAF and the NAFX. We developed an automated NAFX equivalent to the original NAF. We demonstrated that equivalence in 10 subjects and the use of the NAFX on two additional (1 human and 1 canine) subjects who were incapable of maintaining fixation within the standard position and velocity limits. We demonstrated the effects of surgery and related the results to visual acuity. We found the results to be comparable to those seen when applying the NAF to subjects who had good fixation control. The NAFX can be determined for CN and LMLN subjects with poor control of fixation by extending the standard NAF position and/or velocity limits for foveation. The resulting function can be used along with the longest foveation domain (derived from the NAFX to measure breadth of a high-NAFX region) to identify the gaze or convergence angles with the best waveform and to predict the best-possible visual acuity that could be achieved with the reduction of their nystagmus.

congenital nystagmus eye movements eye muscle surgery visual acuity waveform function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dell'Osso LF, Gauthier G, Liberman G, Stark L. Eye movement recordings as a diagnostic tool in a case of congenital nystagmus. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1972; 49: 3–13.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dell'Osso LF. Fixation characteristics in hereditary congenital nystagmus. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1973; 50: 85–90.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dell'Osso LF, Flynn JT, Daroff RB. Hereditary congenital nystagmus: An intrafamilial study. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 92: 366–374.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dell'Osso LF, Flynn JT. Congenital nystagmus surgery: a quantitative evaluation of the effects. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 462–469.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bedell HE, Loshin DS. Interrelations between measures of visual acuity and parameters of eye movement in congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 416–421.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickinson CM, Abadi RV. The influence of nystagmoid oscillation on contrast sensitivity in normal observers. Vision Res 1985; 25: 1089–1096.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abadi RV, Worfolk R. Retinal slip velocities in congenital nystagmus. Vision Res 1989; 29: 195–205.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dell'Osso LF, Van der Steen J, Steinman RM, Collewijn H. Foveation dynamics in congenital nystagmus I: Fixation. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 79: 1–23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheth NV, Dell'Osso LF, Leigh RJ, Van Doren CL, Peckham HP. The effects of afferent stimulation on congenital nystagmus foveation periods. Vision Res 1995; 35: 2371–2382.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abadi RV, Dickinson CM. Waveform characteristics in congenital nystagmus. Doc Ophthalmol 1986; 64: 153–167.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ukwade MT, Bedell HE. Variation of congenital nystagmus with viewing distance. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 976–985.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Currie DC, Bedell HE, Song S. Visual acuity for optotypes with image motions simulating congenital nystagmus. Clin Vis Sci 1993; 8: 73–84.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graham CH, Cook C. Visual acuity as a function of intensity and exposure-time. Am J Psychol 1937; 49: 654–661.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keesey UT. Effects of involuntary eye movements on visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am 1960; 50: 769–774.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abadi RV, Dickinson CM, Pascal E, Whittle J, Worfolk R. Sensory and motor aspects of congenital nystagmus. In: Schmid, R, Zambarbieri, D, eds. Ocular Motor Control and Cognitive Processes. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Eye Movements. North Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 1991: 249–262.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dell'Osso LF, Leigh RJ, Sheth NV, Daroff RB. Two types of foveation strategy in ‘latent’ nystagmus. Fixation, visual acuity and stability. Neuro Ophthalmol 1995; 15: 167–186.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobs JB, Dell'Osso LF. An expanded nystagmus acuity function [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: S149.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leigh RJ, Rushton DN, Thurston SE, Hertle RW, Yaniglos SS. Effects of retinal image stabilization in acquired nystagmus due to neurological disease. Neurology 1988; 38: 122–127.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Steinman RM, Collewijn H. Binocular retinal image motion during active head rotation. Vision Res 1980; 20: 415–429.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dell'Osso LF, Hertle RW, Williams RW, Jacobs JB. A new surgery for congenital nystagmus: Effects of tenotomy on an achiasmatic canine and the role of extraocular proprioception. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strab 1999; 3: 166–182.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller PE, Murphy CJ. Vision in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 1623–1634.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Budiansky S. How do the hunted view the hunter? The Field 1999(September): 42–45.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dell'Osso LF. Improving Visual Acuity in Congenital Nystagmus. In: Smith JL, Glaser, JS, eds. Neuro-Ophthalmology Symposium of the University of Miami and the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, vol. VII. St. Louis, CV Mosby Company, 1973: 98–106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • L.F. Dell'Osso
    • 1
    • 2
  • J.B. Jacobs
    • 1
  1. 1.From the Ocular Motor Neurophysiology LaboratoryVeterans Affairs Medical CenterUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Neurology Biomedical Engineering Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations