Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 57–62 | Cite as

Use of phytoperiphyton to assess water quality in north–western Russian rivers

  • Sergey Komulaynen
Article

Abstract

North-west Russia, located between Ladoga and Onega Lakes and theBarents Sea, is remarkable for its high hydrological differentiation andabundance of water. The rivers and their tributaries are largely natural incharacter and with little disturbance by human activity. However, the situationis starting to change, so a biomonitoring approach has been developed to assessthe influence of land-use patterns on the structure of periphyton in thisregion. The periphyton communities in relatively pristine streams and in onesinfluenced by domestic sewage, agricultural, fish breeding farms, mineralisedmining mill wastes and other sources were analyzed in terms of speciesrichness,species diversity, species ecology values, biomass and chlorophyllconcentration.

Monitoring North-western Russia Phytoperiphyton Rivers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Genkal S.I. 1999. Problems in identifying centric diatoms for monitoring the water quality of large rivers. In: Prygiel J., Whitton B.A. and Bukowska J. (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring European Rivers III. Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, France, pp. 182-187.Google Scholar
  2. Komulaynen S. 1990. Periphytic diatoms in small rivers in North-Western USSR. In: Proceedings of 10th International Diatom Symposium. Koeltz Scientific, Koenigstein, pp. 545-552.Google Scholar
  3. Komulaynen S. 1995. Perifiton reki Kenti. V: Vlijanie technogennych vod gorno-obogatitelnogo kombinata na vodoemy sistemy reki Kenti. In: Kuharev V. (ed.), Impacts of dustrial Sewage from the Ore-Dressing Mill on the Kenty River System., Petrozavodsk, pp. 47-60.Google Scholar
  4. Komulaynen S. 1996. Perifiton rek Leningradskoj, Murmanskoj oblastej i respubliki Karelija. In: Kitaev V. (ed.), Periphyton in small rivers of Leningradskaja, Murmanskaja districts and Karelia Republic. Petrozavodsk.Google Scholar
  5. Komulaynen S. 2001. Features of periphyton in some rivers of north-western Russia. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 27 (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Korneva L.G. 1995. Use algae for monitoring rivers in the Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS (Borok, Yaroslavl Region, Russia). In: Whitton B.A. and Rott E. (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Univ. Institut für Botanik, InnsbruckGoogle Scholar
  7. Potapova M. 1999. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Russia. In: Prygiel J., Whitton B.A. and Bukowska J. (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring European Rivers III. Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, France, pp. 96-101.Google Scholar
  8. Rozenberg G.S. and Zinchenko T. (eds) 2001. Malye reki: sovremennoe sostojanie i aktualnye problemy. (in Russian. The Small Rivers: the Modern Condition, urgent Problems), 247 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Sterligova O., Komulaynen S., Pavlovsky S., Ilmast N. and Kuchko A. 2001. Effect of the trout farm on the lake-river ecosystem of the salmon river Lishma. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Poland 1: 219-228.Google Scholar
  10. Strickland J.D.H. and Parsons T.R. 1972. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergey Komulaynen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of BiologyKarelian Research Centre RASPetrozavodskRussia

Personalised recommendations