Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 741–754 | Cite as

Influence of Odor from Wood-Decaying Fungi on Host Selection Behavior of Deathwatch Beetle, Xestobium rufovillosum

  • Steven R. Belmain
  • Monique S. J. Simmonds
  • Wally M. Blaney

Abstract

Adult females of Xestobium rufovillosum de Geer demonstrated anemotactic orientation when exposed to an odor plume containing volatiles generated by wood-decaying fungi (Coriolus versicolor, Donkioporia expansa) and decayed oak wood (Quercus petraea, Quercus robur). They did not orient towards undecayed oak wood, beech (Fagus sylvatica), or pine wood (Pinus sylvestris). Although all insects tested showed anemotactic orientation, responses were nonlinear with respect to insect age. Adult females more readily oriented upwind when they were between 10 and 16 days old. Oviposition choice bioassays showed that ovipositing females would preferentially oviposit on extract-treated cellulose paper discs that had been treated with various strains of the wood-decaying fungus, Donkioporia expansa. HPLC-fractionated mycelial extracts were attractive to ovipositing deathwatch beetles, whereas HPLC-fractionated fungal broth extracts were repellent to ovipositing females. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of timber pest management in historically important buildings.

Deathwatch beetle Xestobium rufovillosum Coleoptera Anobiidae Quercus sphost selection behaviour chemo-orientation behaviour oviposition timber pest wood-decaying fungi Donkioporia expansa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Akers, R. P., and Wood, D. L.1989. Olfactory orientation responses by walking female Ips paraconfususbark beetles II. An anemotaxis assay. J. Chem. Ecol.15:147–1159.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, W. J., and Kramer, E.1979. Search and anemotaxis in cockroaches. J. Insect Physio.25:631–640.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, W. J., Kipp, L. R., and Collins, R. D.1995. The role of chemo-orientation in search behaviour, pp. 105–153, inR. T. Cardé and W. J. Bell (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects II. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  4. Belmain, S. R., Blaney, W. M., and Simmonds, M. S. J.1998. Host selection behaviour of deathwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosumde Geer (Coleoptera: Anobiidae): Oviposition preference choice assays testing old vs. new oak timber, Quercussp. Entomol. Exp. Appl.89:193–199.Google Scholar
  5. Blaney, W. M., Simmonds, M. S. J., Ley, S. V., and Katz, R. B.1987. An electrophysiological and behavioural study of insect antifeedant properties of natural and synthetic drimane related compounds. Physiol. Entomol.12:281–291.Google Scholar
  6. Blaney, W. M., and Simmonds, M. S. J.1990.Abehavioural and electrophysiological study of the role of tarsal chemoreceptors in feeding by adults of Spodoptera, Heliothis virescensand Helicoverpa armigera. J. Insect Physiol.36:743–756.Google Scholar
  7. Day, J. F., and Sjogren, R. D.1994. Vector control by removal trapping. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.50:126–133.Google Scholar
  8. Esser, P., and Tas, A.2001. The roles of location, age and fungal decay in the chemical composition of oak. Eng. Herit. Res. Trans.4:79–86.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, R. C.1937. Studies of the biology of the deathwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosumde Geer: Part I, A summary of the past work and a brief account of the developmental stages. Ann. Appl. Biol.24:600–613.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, R. C.1938. Studies of the biology of the deathwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosumde Geer: Part II, The habits of the adult with special reference to the factors affecting oviposition. Ann. Appl. Biol.25:155–180.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, R. C.1940. Studies of the biology of the deathwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosumde Geer: Part III, Fungal decay in timber in relation to the occurrence and rate of development of the insect. Ann. Appl. Biol.27:545–557.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, R. C.1941. Studies of the biology of the deathwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosumde Geer: Part IV, The effect of type and extent of fungal decay in timber upon the rate of development of the insect. Ann. Appl. Biol.28:244–260.Google Scholar
  13. Goulson, D., Birch, M. C., and Wyatt, T. D.1993. Paternal investment in relation to size in the deathwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosum(Coleoptera, Anobiidae), and evidence for female selection for large mates. J. Insect Behav.6:539–547.Google Scholar
  14. Hansell, M.1985. Ethology, pp. 91–94, inG. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert (eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, E. C.1959. A note on the secondary sex characters of the deathwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosumde Geer (Coleoptera: Anobiidae). Entomol Mon. 1140:208–209.Google Scholar
  16. Heinzel, H. G., and BÖhm, H.1984. Wind orientation in walking carrion beetles (Necrophorus humatorF.) under closed and open loop conditions, pp. 173–176, inJ. Varjü and P. Schnitzler (eds.). Localisation and Orientation in Biology and Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  17. Hickin, N. E.1963. The Insect Factor in Wood Decay. Hutchinson and Co., London, 336 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Hickin, N. E.1974. The changing pattern of timber infestation in buildings in Britain. British Wood Preserving Association News Sheet 135, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, J. R., and Strickler, K. L.1984. Finding and accepting host plants, pp. 127–157, inW. J. Bell and R. T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects I. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  20. Ponsonby, D. J., and Copland, M. J. W.1995. Olfactory responses by the scale insect predator Chilocorus nigritus(F) (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol.15:83–93.Google Scholar
  21. Potting, R. P. J., Vet, L. E. M., and Dicke, M.1995. Host microhabitat location by stem borer parasitoid Cotesia flavipes—the role of herbivore volatiles and locally and systemically induced plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol.21:525–539.Google Scholar
  22. Preiss, R., and Kramer, E.1986. Anemotactic orientation of gypsy moth males and its modification by the attractant pheromone (+)-disparlure during walking. Physiol. Entomol.11:185–198.Google Scholar
  23. Simmonds, M. S. J., Belmain, S. R., and Blaney, W. M.2001. Integrated pest management for the control of deathwatch beetles: Trapping. Eng. Herit. Res. Trans.4:40–50.Google Scholar
  24. Steinberg, S., Dicke, M., Vet, L. E. M., and Wanningen, R.1992. Response of the braconid parasitoid Cotesia (=Apanteles) glomeratato volatile infochemicals—effects of bioassay setup, parasitoid age and experience and barometric flux. Entomol. Exp. Appl.63:163–175.Google Scholar
  25. Ridgway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M., and Inscoe, M. N.1990. Behaviour-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. Marcell Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Visser, J. H.1983. Differential sensory perceptions of plant compounds by insects, pp. 215–230, inP. A. Hedin (ed.). Plant Resistance to Insects. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Visser, J. H.1988. Host plant finding by insects: Orientation, sensory input and search patterns. J. Insect Physiol.34:259–268.Google Scholar
  28. Visser, J. H., and Thiery, D.1986. Effects of feeding experience on the odour conditioned anemotaxes of Colorado potato beetles. Entomol. Exp. Appl.42:198–200.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven R. Belmain
    • 1
  • Monique S. J. Simmonds
    • 2
  • Wally M. Blaney
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Jodrell LaboratoryRoyal Botanic Gardens, KewRichmond, SurreyUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations