Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 1045–1063 | Cite as

Evidence for a Sex Pheromone in Bark Beetle Parasitoid Roptrocerus xylophagorum

  • Brian T. Sullivan


Male Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Ratzeburg) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) exhibited courtship and mating behaviors including wing fanning, antennation, mounting, and copulation attempts when exposed to glass bulb decoys coated with a whole-body extract of females in hexane, acetone, or methanol. Activity of extract-treated decoys declined gradually over one week. Males responded much less strongly to freeze-killed female cadavers extracted with solvents than to unextracted cadavers; treatment of extracted cadavers with female extract restored male responses. The pheromone was found to be equally present over the surface of both the abdomen and head/thorax of females, and the origin of the pheromone could not be conclusively localized to any single body region. The activity of pheromone on females increased between day 1 and days 3–5 following eclosion; otherwise, pheromone activity was not significantly affected by either female age or mating. Males were arrested within the zone of a glass surface on which females had walked, suggesting that the pheromone might be substrate-borne. Recent exposure to females reduced male responsiveness, but responsiveness was fully restored after a few hours of male isolation from females. When hexane extracts of whole females were fractionated on silica gel, the pheromone's activity was largely recovered with the first, most nonpolar fraction. Female extracts and fractions were analyzed by coupled gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Cuticular hydrocarbon alkanes were identified as the extract components whose concentrations correlated best with male responses. Evidence of the pheromone's long persistence, low volatility, low polarity, and presence over the insect's entire body surface further supported the hypothesis that the pheromone was composed of one or more cuticular hydrocarbons.

parasitoid sex pheromone Roptrocerus xylophagorum Pteromalidae bark beetle Scolytidae cuticular hydrocarbons semiochemicals 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Askari, A.1979.Courtship behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone in the gypsy moth parasitoid Brachymeria intermedia Nees (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae).Z. Angeur. Entomol.88:23–26.Google Scholar
  2. Askari, A. and Alishah, A.1979.Courtship behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone in Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), the cabbage aphid primary parasitoid.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72:749–750.Google Scholar
  3. Blomquist, G. J., Nelson, D. R., and De Renobales, M.1987.Chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology of insect cuticular waxes.Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 6:227–265.Google Scholar
  4. Bushing, R. W.1965.A synoptic list of the parasites of Scolytidae (Coleoptera) in North America north of Mexico.Can. Entomol.97:449–492.Google Scholar
  5. Bushing, R. W.1967.Parasites of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis Leconte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), with particular reference to Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Ratzeburg) (Hymenoptera: Torymidae). PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  6. Carlson, D. A., Bernier, U. R., and Sutton, B. D. 1998.Elution patterns from capillary GC for methyl-branched alkanes.J. Chem. Ecol.24:1845–1865.Google Scholar
  7. Cormier, D., Royer, L., Vigneault, C., Panneton, B., and Boivin, G.1998.Effect of female age on daily cycle of sexual pheromone emission in gregarious egg parasitoid Anaphes listronoti. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:1595–1610.Google Scholar
  8. Eller, F. J., Bartelt, R. J., Jones, R. L., and Kulman, H. M. 1984.Ethyl (Z)-9-hexadecenoate a sex pheromone of Syndipnus rubiginosus, a sawfly parasitoid.J. Chem. Ecol.10:291–300.Google Scholar
  9. Espelie, K. E., Berisford, C. W., and Dahlsten, D. L.1996.Use of cuticular hydrocarbons in bark beetle parasitoid taxonomy: A study of Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Ratzeburg)(Hymenoptera: Torymidae) from the United States, Europe and Australia.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 113B:193–198.Google Scholar
  10. Fauvergue, X., Hopper, K. R., and Antolin, M. F.1995.Mate finding via a trail sex pheromone by a parasitoid wasp.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92:900–904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fauvergue, X., Fouillet, P., Mesquita, A. L. M., and BoulÉtreau, M. 1998.Male orientation to trail sex pheromones in parasitoid wasps: Does the spatial distribution of virgin females matter? J. Insect Physiol. 44:667–675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fauvergue, X., Fleury, F., Lemaitre, C., and Allemand, R. 1999.Parasitoid mating structures when hosts are patchily distributed: field and laboratory experiments with Leptopilina boulardi and L. heterotoma.Oikos 86:344–356.Google Scholar
  13. Howard, R. W. 1993.Cuticular hydrocarbons and chemical communication. pp.179–226, inD. W. Stanley-Samuelson and D. R. Nelson (eds.). Insect Lipids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
  14. Jewett, D. K. and Carpenter, J. E.1999.Chemically-mediated attraction of Ichneumon (=Pterocormus) promissorius (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) males by females.Environ. Entomol. 28:551–556.Google Scholar
  15. Jewett, D. K. and Carpenter, J. E.2001.Seasonal abundance of a pupal parasitoid, Diapetimorpha introita (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Fla. Entomol. 84:50–54.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, R. L.1996.Semiochemicals in host and mate finding behavior of Macrocentrus grandii Goidanich (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).Fla. Entomol.79:105–108.Google Scholar
  17. Kainoh, Y. and Oishi, Y.1993.Source of sex pheromone of the egg-larval parasitoid, Ascogaster reticulatus, Watanabe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).J. Chem. Ecol.19:963–969.Google Scholar
  18. Kainoh, Y., Nemoto, T., Shimizu, K., Tatsuki, S., Kusano, T., and Kuwahara, Y. 1991. Mating behavior of Ascogaster reticulatusWatanabe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an egg-larval parasitoid of the smaller tea tortrix, Adoxophyes sp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) III. Identification of a sex pheromone.Appl. Entomol. Zool.26:543–549.Google Scholar
  19. Kamano, Y., Shimizu, K., Kainoh, Y., and Tatsuki, S.1989.Mating behavior of Ascogaster reticulatus Watanabe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an egg-larval parasitoid of the smaller tea tortrix, Adosophyes sp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) II. Behavioral sequence and role of sex pheromone. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 24:372–378.Google Scholar
  20. Kitano, H.1975.Studies on the courtship behavior of Apanteles glomeratus L. 2. Role of the male wing during courtship and the releaser of mounting and copulatory behavior in the males. Kontyû, Tokyo 43:513–521.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, W. J., Snow, J. W., and Jones, R. L. 1971.A pheromone trap for studying populations of Cardiochiles nigriceps, a parasite of Heliothis vierescens.J. Econ. Entomol.64:1417–1421.Google Scholar
  22. Matthews, P. L. and Stephen, F. M.1997.Effect of artificial diet on longevity of adult parasitoids of Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Environ. Entomol.26:961–965.Google Scholar
  23. McNeil, J. N. and Brodeur, J.1995.Pheromone-mediated mating in the aphid parasitoid, Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphididae).J. Chem. Ecol.21:959–972.Google Scholar
  24. Mills, N. J. and Schlup, J.1989.The natural enemies of Ips typographus in central Europe: impact and potential use in biological control. pp. 131–146, in D. L. Kulhavy and M. C. Miller (eds.). Potential for Biological Control of Dendroctonus and Ips Bark Beetles.University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  25. Obara, M. and Kitano, H. 1974.Studies on the courtship behavior of Apanteles glomeratus L. I. Experimental studies on releaser of wing-vibrating behavior in the male.Kontyu, Tokyo42:209–214.Google Scholar
  26. Pompanon, F., Deschepper, B., Mourer, Y., Fouillet, P., and Bouletreau, M.1997. Evidence for a substrate-borne sex pheromone in the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma brassicae.J. Chem. Ecol.23:1349–1360.Google Scholar
  27. Powell, W.1986.Enhancing parasitoid activity in crops. pp.319–340, inJ. Waage and D. Greathead (eds.). Insect Parasitoids.Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  28. Reed, H. C., Tan, S., Reed, D. K., Elliott, N. C., Burd, J. D., and Walker, T.1994. Evidence for a sex attractant in Aphidius colemani Viereck with potential use in field studies.Southwest. Entomol.19:273–278.Google Scholar
  29. Robacker, D. C., Weaver, K. M., and Hendry, L. B.1976.Sexual communication and associative learning in the parasitic wasp Itoplectis conquisitor (Say).J. Chem. Ecol.2:39–48.Google Scholar
  30. Samson, P. R.1984.The biology of Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Hym.:Torymidae), with a note on its taxonomic status.Entomophaga29:287–298.Google Scholar
  31. SigmaStat.1997.SigmaStat 2.0 for Windows User's Manual. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  32. SchwÖrer, U., VÖlkl, W., and Hoffmann, K. H.1999.Foraging for mates in the hyperparasitic wasp,Dendrocerus carpenteri: Impact of unfavourable weather conditions and parasitoid age. Oecologia 119:73–80.Google Scholar
  33. Shu, S. and Jones, R. L.1993.Evidence for a multicomponent sex pheromone in Eriborus terebrans (Gravenhorst) (Hym.: Ichneumonidae), a larval parasitoid of the European corn borer.J. Chem. Ecol.19:2563–2576.Google Scholar
  34. Simser, D. H. and Coppel, H. C.1980.Female-produced sex pheromone in Brachymeria lasus and B. intermedia (Hym.: Chalcididae).Entomophaga25:373–380.Google Scholar
  35. Sullivan, B.T., Seltmann, K. C., and Berisford, C.W.1999.Asimple continuous-rearing technique for the bark beetle parasitoid, Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Ratzeburg).J. Entomol. Sci.34:260–264.Google Scholar
  36. Sullivan, B. T., Pettersson, E. M., Seltmann, K. C., and Berisford, C.W.2000.Attraction of the bark beetle parasitoid Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to host-associated olfactory cues.Environ. Entomol. 29:1138–1151.Google Scholar
  37. Swedenborg, P. D. and Jones, R. L.1992a.Multicomponent sex pheromone in Macrocentrus grandii Goidanich (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 18:1901–1912.Google Scholar
  38. Swedenborg, P. D. and Jones, R. L.1992b.(Z)-4-Tridecenal, a pheromonally active air oxidation product from a series of (Z,Z)-9,13 dienes in Macrocentrus grandii Goidanich (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).J. Chem. Ecol.18:1913–1931.Google Scholar
  39. Syvertsen, T. C., Jackson, L. L., Blomquist, G. J., and Vinson, S. B.1995.Alkadienes mediating courtship in the parasitoid Cardiochiles nigriceps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1971–1989.Google Scholar
  40. Tagawa, J.1977.Localization and histology of the female sex pheromone-producing gland in the parasitic wasp, Apanteles glomeratus.J. Insect Physiol.23:49–56.Google Scholar
  41. Takahashi, S. and Sugai, T.1982.Mating behavior of the parasitoid wasp Tetrastichus hagenowii (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae).Entomologia Generalis7:287–293.Google Scholar
  42. Van Den Assem, J.1986.Mating behavior in parasitic wasps. pp. 137–167, in J. Waage and D. Greathead (eds.). Insect Parasitoids.Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  43. Vinson, S. B. 1972.Courtship behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone in the parasitoid Campoletis sonorensis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Environ. Entomol.1:409–414.Google Scholar
  44. Vinson, S. B. 1978.Courtship behavior and source of a sexual pheromone from Cardochiles nigriceps. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71:832–837.Google Scholar
  45. Weseloh, R. M.1980.Sex pheromone gland of the gypsy moth parasitoid, Apanteles melanoscelus: Revaluation and ultrastructual survey.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.73:576–580.Google Scholar
  46. Yoshida, S.1978.Behaviour of males in relation to the female sex pheromone in the parasitoid wasp, Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae).Entomol. Exp. Appl.23:152–162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian T. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA Forest ServiceSouthern Research StationPineville

Personalised recommendations