Advertisement

Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 247–281 | Cite as

Buyer Power and its Impact on Competition in the Food Retail Distribution Sector of the European Union

  • Paul W. Dobson
  • Roger Clarke
  • Stephen Davies
  • Michael Waterson
Article

Abstract

In recent years, there has been significant consolidation and concentration in food retail distribution in the European Union, as our paper documents. We examine the implications of this from the social welfare viewpoint. Our focus is on buyer power, since a commonly held view is that, arising from increased concentration, it may be a buffer to significant manufacturer power. We investigate the issue both theoretically and through data and case study work. We suggest the market will develop into a concentrated pattern across Europe, but that the eventual impact on consumers will depend significantly on the nature and form of competition between large retail chains and how well buying groups ensure that even the smaller retailers can compete on an effective basis.

buyer power retailing competition concentration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, R., Davies, R., and Howard, E., “The changing structure of food retailing in Europe: the implications for strategy,” Long Range Planning, vol. 30no. 6, pp. 853-861, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Blair, R.D. and Harrison, J.L., Monopsony—Antitrust Law and Economics, Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Borghesani, W.H. Jr., de la Cruz, P.L., and Berry, D.B., “Food for thought: the emergence of power buyers and its challenge to competition analysis,” Discussion Paper, Keller and Heckman: Washington DC, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Bowley, A.L., “Bilateral Monopoly,” Economic Journal, vol. 38, pp. 651-659, 1928.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, R., Davies, S., Dobson, P., and Waterson, M., Buyer Power and Competition in European Food Retailing, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. Competition Commission, Supermarkets: A Report on the Supply of Groceries from Multiple Stores in the United Kingdom, Cm 4842, TSO: London, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Cruz, I., Fernandez, A., and Rebello, A., “Estregia de aplazamiento de pago en las empresas espanolas de distribucion de alimentacion,” Perspectivas del Sistema Financierio, vol. 57, pp. 45-57, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, S.W., Lyons, B., Dixon, H., and Geroski, P., Industrial Organization in the European Union, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, S.W., Rondi, L., and Sembenelli, A., “European integration and leading firms' entry and exit atrategies,” UEA Economics Research Centre, Discussion Paper no. 9815, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson Consulting, Buyer Power and Its Impact on Competition in the Food Retail Distribution Sector of the European Union, European Commission DGIV, Brussels, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. Dobson, P.W., Vertically and Horizontally Related Market Structures. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Dobson, P.W. and Waterson, M., “Countervailing power and consumer prices,” Economic Journal, vol. 107, pp. 418-430, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Dobson, P.W. and Waterson, M., “Retailer power: recent developments and policy implications,” Economic Policy, vol. 28, pp. 135-164, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Dobson, P.W., Waterson, M., and Chu, A., The Welfare Consequences of the Exercise of Buyer Power, Research Paper 16, Office of Fair Trading, London, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission, “Green paper on vertical restraints in EC competition policy,” COM (96) 721 Final, Brussels, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. Fellner, W., Competition Among the Few, Knopf: New York, 1949.Google Scholar
  17. Forchheimer, K., “Theoretisches zum unvollstandigen Monopole,” Schmollers Jahrbuch, pp. 1-12, 1908.Google Scholar
  18. Mathewson, G.F. and Winter, R.A., “Buyer groups,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 15, pp. 137-164, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. Morgan, J.N., “Bilateral monopoly and the competitive output,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 63, pp. 371-391, 1949.Google Scholar
  20. Nichol, A.J., “Review of a theoretical analysis of imperfect competition with special application to the agricultural industries by W.H. Nicholls,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 51, pp. 82-84, 1943.Google Scholar
  21. OECD, “Buyer power of large scale multiproduct retailers,” Background paper by the Secretariat, Roundtable on Buying Power, OECD, Paris, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. Rubinstein, A., “Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model,” Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 97-109, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. Shea, J., “Do supply curves slope up?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, pp. 1-32, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. Stackelberg, H. von, Marktform und Gleichgewicht, Julius Springer: Berlin, 1934.Google Scholar
  25. Sutton, J., Sunk Costs and Market Structure, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991.Google Scholar
  26. Veendorp, E.C.H., “Oligoemporistic competition and the countervailing power hypothesis,” Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 20, pp. 519-526, 1987.Google Scholar
  27. Vogel, L., “Competition law and buying power: the case for a new approach in Europe,” European Competition Law Review, no. 1, pp. 4-11, 1998.Google Scholar
  28. Williamson, O.E., “Economics as an antitrust defense: the welfare tradeoffs,” American Economic Review, vol. 58, pp. 18-36, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul W. Dobson
    • 1
  • Roger Clarke
    • 2
  • Stephen Davies
    • 3
  • Michael Waterson
    • 4
  1. 1.Business SchoolLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Cardiff Business SchoolUniversity of Wales College of CardiffCardiffUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.School of Economic and Social StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUnited Kingdom
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsUniversity of WarwickCoventryUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations