Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 299–345 | Cite as

Unarticulated Constituents

  • François Recanati
Article

Abstract

In a recent paper (Linguistics and Philosophy23, 4, June 2000), Jason Stanley argues that there are no `unarticulated constituents', contrary to what advocates of Truth-conditional pragmatics (TCP) have claimed. All truth-conditional effects of context can be traced to logical form, he says. In this paper I maintain that there are unarticulated constituents, and I defend TCP. Stanley's argument exploits the fact that the alleged unarticulated constituents can be `bound', that is, they can be made to vary with the values introduced by operators in the sentence. I show that Stanley's argument rests on a fallacy, and I provide alternative analyses of the data.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bach, K.: 1994a, 'Semantic Slack: What is Said and More', in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 267-91.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, K.: 1994b, 'Conversational Impliciture', Mind and Language 9, 124-162.Google Scholar
  3. Barwise, J.: 1989, The Situation in Logic, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  4. Carston, R.: 1988, 'Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics', in R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 155-181.Google Scholar
  5. Carston, R.: forthcoming, 'Explicature and Semantics', to appear in S. Davis and B. Gillon (eds.), Semantics: A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chalmers, D.: 1996, The Conscious Mind, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N.: 1976, 'Conditions on Rules of Grammar', Linguistic Analysis 2, 303-351.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N.: 1986, 'Changing Perspectives on Knowledge and Use of Language', in M. Brand and M. Harnish (eds.), The Representation of Knowledge and Belief, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1-58.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, H. and S. Haviland: 1974, 'Psychological Processes as Linguistic Explanation', in D. Cohen (ed.), Explaining Linguistic Phenomena, Hemisphere Publication Corporation, Washington.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, H. and S. Haviland: 1977, 'Comprehension and the Given-New Contract', in R. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension, Ablex, Norwood New Jersey.Google Scholar
  11. Cresswell, M.: 1996, Semantic Indexicality, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Crimmins, M.: 1992, Talk About Belief, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Fillmore, C.: 1986, 'Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora', BLS 12, 95-107.Google Scholar
  14. Heal, J.: 1997, 'Indexical Predicates and Their Uses', Mind 106, 619-640.Google Scholar
  15. Higginbotham, J.: 1985, 'On Semantics', Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547-593.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobson, P.: 1999, 'Towards a Variable-Free Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 117-184.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, D.: 1989, 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 481-563.Google Scholar
  18. Larson, R. and G. Segal: 1995, Knowledge of Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Levin, B.: 1993, English Verb Classes and Alternations, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. McConnell-Ginet, S.: 1982, 'Adverbs and Logical Form', Language 58, 144-184.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, J.: 1986, The Formal Semantics of Point of View, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  22. Nunberg, G.: 1992, 'Two Kinds of Indexicality', in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT II, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 283-301.Google Scholar
  23. Partee, B.: 1989, 'Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts', CLS 25, 342-365.Google Scholar
  24. Perry, J.: 1993, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Perry, J.: 1998, 'Indexicals, Contexts, and Unarticulated Constituents', in D. Westertahl et al. (eds.), Computing Natural Language, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 1-11.Google Scholar
  26. Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, 'Variables Explained Away', in his Selected Logic Papers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995, pp. 227-235.Google Scholar
  27. Recanati, F.: 1993, Direct Reference: from Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Recanati, F.: 1995, 'The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation', Cognitive Science 19, 207-232.Google Scholar
  29. Recanati, F.: 1999, 'Situations and the Structure of Content', in K. Murasugi and R. Stainton (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics,Westview, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 113-165.Google Scholar
  30. Recanati, F.: 2001, 'What Is Said', Synthese 128, 75-91.Google Scholar
  31. Recanati, F.: forthcoming, 'Truth-Conditional Pragmatics: An Overview', in P. Bouquet and L. Serafini (eds.), Context, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  32. Rumelhart, D.: 1979, 'Some Problems with the Notion of Literal Meanings', in A.Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 71-82.Google Scholar
  33. Searle, J.: 1992, The Rediscovery of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Sperber D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. Stalnaker, R.: 1999, Context and Content, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Stanley, J.: 2000, 'Context and Logical Form', Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391-434.Google Scholar
  37. Stanley, J.: forthcoming, 'Making It Articulated', to appear in Mind and Language.Google Scholar
  38. Stanley, J. and Z. Szabo: 2000, 'On Quantifier Domain Restriction', Mind and Language 15, 219-261.Google Scholar
  39. Taylor, K.: 2001, 'Sex, Breakfast, and Descriptus Interruptus', Synthese 128, 45-61.Google Scholar
  40. Tesniè re, L.: 1969, Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale, 2nd ed., Klincksieck, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Recanati
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Jean-Nicod (CNRS)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations