Molecular Breeding

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 345–349

Biolistic mediated site-specific integration in rice



Cre-lox mediated site-specific integration in tobacco or Arabidopsis used polyethylene glycol or Agrobacterium, respectively, to deliver the integrating DNA. The polyethylene glycol method is inconvenient since it requires the use of protoplasts. The Agrobacterium method is inefficient as the single-stranded T-DNA is not a substrate for Cre-lox recombination. In this study, we tested the biolistic method for the site-specific insertion of DNA into the rice genome. Two target callus lines, each harboring a single genomic lox target, were generated by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The target callus lines were subjected to a second round of transformation by particle bombardment with a construct designed to excise the plasmid backbone from the integrating DNA, followed by the recombination of the integrating DNA into the genomic lox target. Site-specific integration was obtained from both target callus lines. Three integrant plants were regenerated from one target line and were found to have a precise copy of the integrating DNA at the target site, although only one plant has the integrating DNA as the sole copy in the genome. Site-specific integration through the biolistic delivery of DNA can be considered for other plants that are transformable via particle bombardment.

Cre-lox Particle bombardment Site-specific recombination Transgenic rice 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albert H., Dale E.C., Lee E. and Ow D.W. 1995. Site-specific integration of DNA into wild-type and mutant lox sites placed in the plant genome. Plant J. 7: 649–659.Google Scholar
  2. Day C.D., Lee E., Kobayashi J., Holappa L. D., Albert H. and Ow D.W. 2000. Transgene integration into the same chromosomal location can produce alleles that express at a predictable level, or alleles that are differentially silenced. Genes Dev. 14: 2869–2880.Google Scholar
  3. Hajdukiewiecz P., Svab Z. and Maliga P. 1994. The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 989–994.Google Scholar
  4. Hohn B., Levy A.A. and Puchta H. 2001. Elimination of selection markers from transgenic plants. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 12: 139–143.Google Scholar
  5. Iyer L.M., Kumpatla S.P., Chandrasekharan M.B. and Hall T.C. 2000. Transgene silencing in monocots. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 323–346.Google Scholar
  6. Lyznik L.A., Rao K.V. and Hodges T.K. 1996. FLP-mediated recombination of FRT sites in the maize genome. Nucl. Acid Res. 24: 3784–3789.Google Scholar
  7. Maqbool S.B. and Chritou P. 1999. Multiple traits of agronomic importance in transgenic indica rice plants: analysis of transgene integration patterns, expression levels and stability. Mol. Breed. 5: 471–480.Google Scholar
  8. Matzke M.A., Mette M.F. and Matzke A.J.M. 2000. Transgene silencing by the host genome defense: implications for the evolution of epigenetic control mechanisms in plants and vertebrates. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 401–415.Google Scholar
  9. Meyer P. 2000. Transcriptional transgene silencing and chromatin component. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 221–234.Google Scholar
  10. Muskens M.W.M., Vissers A.P.A., Mol J.N.M. and Kooter J.M. 2000. Role of inverted DNA repeats in transcriptional and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 243–260.Google Scholar
  11. Ow D.W. and Medberry S.L. 1995. Genome manipulation through site-specific recombination. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 14: 239–261.Google Scholar
  12. Puchta H. and Hohn B. 1996. From centiMorgans to base pairs: homologous recombination in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 340–348.Google Scholar
  13. Vergunst A.C., Jansen L.E.T. and Hooykaas P.J.J. 1998. Site-specific integration of Agrobacterium T-DNA in Arabidopsis thaliana mediated by Cre recombinase. Nucl. Acids Res. 26: 2729–2734.Google Scholar
  14. Vergunst, A.C. and Hooykaas, P.J.J. 1998. Cre/lox-mediated sitespecific integration of Agrobacterium T-DNA in Arabidopsis thaliana by transient expression of cre. Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 393–406.Google Scholar
  15. Vergunst, A.C. and Hooykaas, P.J.J. 1999. Recombination in the plant genome and its application in biotechnology. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18: 1–31.Google Scholar
  16. Zuo J., Niu Q.-W., Moller S.G. and Chua N.-H. 2001. Chemicalregulated, site-specific DNA excision in transgenic plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 157–161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA-ARSPlant Gene Expression CenterAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Plant & Microbial BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations