Advertisement

International Journal of Group Tensions

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 187–215 | Cite as

An Interview with Georg Lind

  • Helen Haste
Discussion
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Georg Lind is being interviewed by Helen Haste about his work in moral psychology. In the interview, he discusses the meaning and measurement of moral competencies, which he sees as crucial to bridge the gap between moral ideals and action, and to maintain modern democracies, which rely on the enactment of shared moral ideals. Lind has carried out and inspired one of the largest research programs in moral psychology, including longitudinal, cross-cultural, intervention, and experimental studies. His new methodology, the Moral Judgment Test, has been translated and adapted into many languages. Lind has also contributed much to the improvement and dissemination of educational methods to foster moral competencies. The intellectual and biographical roots of his interests are explored.

moral judgment discourse competence measurement education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bargel, T., Markiewicz, W., & Peisert, H. (1982). University graduates: Study experience and social role—Empirical findings of a comparative study in five European countries. In M. Niessen & J. Peschar (Eds.), Comparative research on education (pp. 55–78). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  2. Blatt, M., & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The effect of classroom moral discussion upon children's level of moral judgment. Journal of Moral Education, 4, 129–161.Google Scholar
  3. Emler, N., Renwick, S., & Malone, B. (1983). The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1073–1080.Google Scholar
  4. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. English edition: Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Translator: Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Habermas, J. (1983). Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. English translation: Habermas, J. (1992). Moral consciousness and communicative action (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought). Translators: Shierry Weber Nicholsen, Christian Lenhardt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, J., Friedeburg, L.v., Oehler, Ch., & Weltz, F. (1969/1961). Student und Politik. Eine soziologische Untersuchung zum politischen Bewusstsein Frankfurter Studenten. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  8. Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928–1930). Studies in the nature of character. Vols. 1–3. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Keasey, C. B. (1974). The influence of opinion-agreement and qualitative supportive reasoning in the evaluation of moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 477–482.Google Scholar
  10. Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16. University of Chicago, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  11. Kohlberg, L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1, pp. 381–431). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development. Vol. 2, The psychology of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Levy-Suhl, M. (1912). Die Prüufung der sittlichen Reife jugendlicher Angeklagter und die Reformvorschl¨age zum § 56 des deutschen Strafgesetzbuches. Zeitschrift für Psychotherapie, 232–254.Google Scholar
  14. Lind, G. (1978). Wie misst man moralisches Urteil? Probleme und alternative M¨oglichkeiten der Messung eines komplexen Konstrukts. In G. Portele (Ed.), Sozialisation und Moral (pp. 171–201). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  15. Lind, G. (1986). Cultural differences in moral judgment competence? A study of West and East European university students. Behavior Science Research 20, 208–225.Google Scholar
  16. Lind, G. (1987). Moral competence and education in democratic society. In G. Zecha & P. Weingartner (Eds.), Conscience: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 91–122). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  17. Lind, G. (1989). Essay Review: "The measurement of moral judgment" by Anne Colby, Lawrence Kohlberg, et al. Human Development 32, 388–397.Google Scholar
  18. Lind, G. (1995). What do educators know about their students? A study of pluralistic ignorance. In R. Olechowski & G. Svik (Eds.), Experimental research on teaching and learning (pp. 221–243). Frankfurt, Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Lind, G. (2000a). Are helpers always moral? Empirical findings from a longitudinal study of medical students in Germany. In A. L. Comunian & U. P. Gielen (Eds.), International perspectives on human development (pp. 463–477). Lengerich: Papst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Lind, G. (2000b). The importance of role-taking opportunities for self-sustaining moral development. Journal of Research in Education, 10, 9–15.Google Scholar
  21. Lind, G. (2002). Ist Moral lehrbar? Ergebnisse der modernen moralpsychologischen Forschung. Berlin: Logos-Verlag (www.logos-verlag.de). ISBN 3-89722-255-8 (3nd re. ed. of "Moral und Bildung," Heidelberg, 1993).Google Scholar
  22. Lind, G., & Althof, W. (1992). Does the Just Community experience make a difference? Evaluation and evidence of the effect size of the German program. Moral Education Forum, 17, 19–28.Google Scholar
  23. Lind, G., Hartmann, H. A., & Wakenhut, R. (Eds.). (1985). Moral development and the social environment. Studies in the psychology and philosophy of moral judgment and education. Chicago: Precedent.Google Scholar
  24. Lind, G., & Raschert, J. (Eds.). (1987). Moralische Urteilsfähigkeit—Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Lawrence Kohlbergüber Moral, Erziehung und Demokratie. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  25. Lind, G., & Wakenhut, R. (1985). Testing for moral judgment competence. In G. Lind, H. A. Hartmann, & R. Wakenhut (Eds.), Moral development and the social environment (pp. 79–105). Chicago: Precedent.Google Scholar
  26. McNamee, S. (1977). Moral behavior, moral development and motivation. Journal of Moral Education, 7(1), 27–31.Google Scholar
  27. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.Google Scholar
  28. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  29. Oser, F., & Althof, W. (1992). Moralische Selbstbestimmung. Modelle der Entwicklung und Erziehung im Wertebereich. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  30. Piaget, J. (1965/1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Power, F. C., Higgins, C., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). Lawrence Kohlberg's approach to moral education. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Sandberger, J.-U., & Lind, G. (1979). The outcomes of university education: Some empirical findings on aims and expectations in the Federal Republic of Germany. Higher Education, 8, 179–203.Google Scholar
  35. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Haste
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BathEngland

Personalised recommendations