Landscape Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 43–56

Ecological relationships between landscape change and plant guilds in depressional wetlands

  • Ricardo D. Lopez
  • Craig B. Davis
  • M. Siobhan Fennessy
Article

Abstract

Plant guilds used to measure the relationships between wetlandplant community characteristics and landscape change around 31 depressionalwetlands in central Ohio, USA. Characteristics of certain plant guilds withineach wetland site are correlated with changes in: (a) area of urban land cover,forest, grassland, agriculture, and open-water in the local vicinity ofthe wetland; (b) inter-wetland distance; and (c) wetland size (area).Taxa richness is negatively correlated with inter-wetland distance forall plant guilds, except submersed herbaceous plants. Taxa richness of thesubmersed herbaceous plant guild (usually less than 20% of the totalnumber of plant species at a wetland) is positively correlated with the area ofopen-water in the local landscape and with the areaofthe wetland site itself. Significant positive correlationsalso exist between the area of open-water in the vicinity of the wetlandand the proportion of submersed herbaceous plant taxa at the site, the numberofnative submersed herbaceous plant species, the submersed herbaceous plantperennial-to-annual ratio, and the number ofavian-dispersed submersed herbaceous plant species at a site. Theresults suggest that (a) the dominance of submersed herbaceousplantspecies at a site is related to dispersal constraints between wetlands, and (b)the relatively slower physiological response of woody plants to local landscapechange may result in their contribution to greater ‘ecologicalinertia’ in the plant community as a whole. For these reasons,relationships between the plant community and land cover change may not alwaysbe observed unless analyzed at the level of plant-guild.

Depressional wetland Ecological indicator Ecological inertia Fragmentation Gradient Island biogeography Ohio Plant guild 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamus P.R. and Brandt K. 1990. Impacts on Quality of Inland Wetlands of the United States: A Survey of Indicators, Techniques, and Applications of Community Level Biomonitoring Data. EPA/600/3-90/073. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvalis, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  2. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. USGS Professional Paper 964. Anderson J.R., Hardy E.E., Roach J.T. and Witmer R.E. 1976..Google Scholar
  3. Andreas B.K. and Lichvar R.W. 1995. Floristic Index for Assessment Standards: A Case Study for Northern Ohio. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-8. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Brinson M. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Catling P.M., Freedman B., Stewart C., Kerekes J.J. and Lefkovitch L.P. 1986. Aquatic plants of acid lakes in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia; floristic composition and relation to water chemistry. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 724-729.Google Scholar
  6. Chapin F.S. 1991. Integrated response of plants to stress. Bio-Science 41: 29-36.Google Scholar
  7. Cowardin L.M., Carter V., Golet F.C. and LaRoe E.T. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  8. Dahl T.E. 1990. Wetlands Losses in the United States, 1780s to 1980s. U.S. Fish andWildlife Service, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond J.M. 1974. Colonization of exploded volcanic islands by birds: The supertramp strategy. Science 184: 803-806.Google Scholar
  10. Dzwonko Z. and Loster S. 1988. Species richness of small woodlands on the western Carpathian foothills. Vegetatio 76: 15-27.Google Scholar
  11. Falkner E. 1994. Aerial Mapping: Methods and Applications. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Fennessy M.S., Geho R., Elifritz B. and Lopez R. 1998a. Testing the Floristic Quality Assessment Index as an Indicator of Riparian Wetland Quality. Final Report to U.S. EPA. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Fennessy M.S., Gray M., Lopez R. and Mack M. 1998b. An Assessment of Wetlands Using Reference Sites. Final Report to U.S. EPA. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Forman R.T.T. 1995. Land Mosaics. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Gacia E., Ballesteros E., Camarero L., Delgado O., Palau A., Riera J.L. et al. 1994. Macrophytes from lakes in the eastern Pyrenees: Community composition and ordination in relation to environmental factors. Freshwater Biology 32: 73-81.Google Scholar
  16. Galatowitsch S.M. and van der Valk A.G. 1996. The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlands. Ecological Applications 6: 102-112.Google Scholar
  17. Godwin H. 1923. Dispersal of pond floras. Journal of Ecology 11: 160-164.Google Scholar
  18. Green R.H. 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Harris L.D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen J.R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Jones K.B., Neale A.C., Nash M.S., Van Remortel R.D., Wickham J.D., Riitters K.H. et al. 2001. Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region. Landscape Ecology 16: 301-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karr J.R. and Chu E.W. 1997. Biological Monitoring and Assessment: Using Multimetric Indexes Effectively. EPA/235/R97/001. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Keddy P.A., Lee H.T. and Wisheu I.C. 1993. Choosing Indicators of Ecosystem Integrity: Wetlands as a Model System. In: Woodley S., Kay J. and Francis G. (eds), Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Leibowitz S.G., Abbruzzese B., Adamus P.R., Hughes L.E. and Irish J.T. 1992. sA Synoptic Approach to Cumulative Impact Assessment: A Proposed Methodology. EPA/600/R-92/167. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvalis, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Lillesand T.M. and Kiefer R.W. 1994. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Lopez R.D. 1999. An Ecological Assessment of the Relationships Between Landscape Structure and Depressional-Wetland Ecosystem Status Along Environmental Gradients in Central Ohio. PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
  27. Lyon J.G. 1981. The Influence of Lake Michigan Water Levels on Wetland Soils and Distribution of Plants in the Straits of Mackinac, Michigan. PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
  28. Lyon J.G. 2001.Wetland Landscape Characterization: GIS, Remote Sensing, and Image Analysis. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  29. MacArthur R. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  31. McDonnell M.J. 1984. Interactions between landscape elements: Dispersal of bird disseminated plants in post-agricultural landscapes. In: Brandt J. and Agger P. (eds), Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning. Vol. 2. Roskilde Universitersforlag GoeRuc, Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
  32. McDonnell M.J. and Stiles E.W. 1983. The structural complexity of old field vegetation and the recruitment of bird-dispersed plant species. Oecologia 56: 109-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moller T.R. and Rordam C.P. 1985. Species numbers of vascular plants in relation to area, isolation, and age of ponds in Denmark. Oikos 45: 8-16.Google Scholar
  34. Mueller-Dombois D. and Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley and Sons, London, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Nip-van der Voort J., Hengeveld R. and Haeck J. 1979. Immigration rates of plant succession in three Dutch polders. Journal of Biogeography 6: 301-308.Google Scholar
  36. Odum E.P. 1985. Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. Bio-Science 35: 419-422.Google Scholar
  37. Ohio Department of Natural Resources 1999. List of Invasive, Threatened Invasive, and Potentially Invasive Plant List for Ohio. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
  38. Opdam P., Apeldoorn R.V., Schotman A. and Kalkhoven J. 1993. Population responses to landscape fragmentation. In: Vos C.C. and Opdam P. (eds), Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  39. Peterson S.A., Carpenter L., Guntenspergen G. and Cowardin L.M. (eds) 1996. Pilot Test of Wetland Condition Indicators in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States. EPA/620/R-97/002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvalis, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Reed P.B. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.3). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  41. Ridley H.N. 1930. The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. L. Reeve and Co. LTD, Ashford, Kent, UK.Google Scholar
  42. Simberloff D. and Wilson E.O. 1970. Experimental zoogeography of islands. A two-year record of colonization. Ecology 51: 934-937.Google Scholar
  43. Simpson J.W., Boerner R.E.J., DeMers M.N., Berns L.A., Artigas F.J. and Silva A. 1994. Forty-eight years of landscape change on two contiguous Ohio landscapes. Landscape Ecology 9: 261-270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strittholt J.R. and Boerner R.E.J. 1995. Applying biodiversity gap analysis in a regional nature reserve design for the edge of Appalachia, Ohio (U.S.A.). Conservation Biology 9: 1492-1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. ACOE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) 1987. Corps of Engineers-Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. Department of the Army, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 1990. Biological Criteria: National Program Guidance for Surface Waters. EPA-440/5-90-004. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 1994. National Water Quality Inventory. EPA-841-R-94-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  48. van der Valk A.G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: A Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62: 688-696.Google Scholar
  49. Voss E.G. 1972. Part I, Gymnosperms and Monocots.Google Scholar
  50. Voss E.G. 1985. Part II, Dicots, Saururaceae-Cornaceae.Google Scholar
  51. Voss E.G. 1996. Part III, Dicots, Pyrolaceae-Compositae.Google Scholar
  52. Wilhelm G. and Ladd D. 1988. Natural Area Assessment in the Chicago Region. In: Transactions of the Fifty-third North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference (Louisville, Kentucky). Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 361-375.Google Scholar
  53. Yoder C. 1991. Answering some concerns about biological criteria based on experiences in Ohio. In: Proceedings of Water Quality Standards for the 21st Century. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 95-104.Google Scholar
  54. Zar J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo D. Lopez
    • 1
  • Craig B. Davis
    • 1
  • M. Siobhan Fennessy
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Natural Resources ColumbusThe Ohio State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations