Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 71–78 | Cite as

The role of metaethics and the future of computer ethics

  • Antonio Marturano

Abstract

In the following essay, I will discuss D.Johnson's argument in her ETHICOMP99 KeynoteSpeech (Johnson 1999) regarding the possiblefuture disappearance of computer ethics as anautonomous discipline, and I will analyze somelikely objections to Johnson's view.In the future, there are two ways in whichcomputer ethics might disappear: (1) therejection of computer ethics as an aspect ofapplied ethics, or (2) the rejection ofcomputer ethics as an autonomous discipline.The first path, it seems to me, would lead tothe death of the entire field of appliedethics, while the second path would lead onlyto the death of computer ethics as a separatesubject. Computer technology is becoming very pervasive,and each scientific field includes somediscipline-specific computing. For the likelyforeseeable future, disciplines such asbioethics and engineering ethics will have todeal with ethical issues involving the role ofcomputers. I will argue that computer ethics inthis sense is unlikely to disappear, even ifcomputer ethics ceases to be considered as aseparate discipline.In order to understand which path will befollowed by computer ethics, I will compareJohnson's argument with ideas of earlierthinkers like N. Wiener (1950) and B. Russell(1932). Although Russell did not specificallyconsider computer technology, he had somegood intuitions about the development ofsocieties by means of technology.My conclusion will be two-fold: (1) thatapplied ethics will not die, but it may make nosense in the future to talk about computerethics as a separate field; and (2) thatcomputer ethics will not simply become``ordinary ethics'', contrary to Johnson's view.

applied ethics Bertrand Russell Deborah Johnson ordinary ethics technology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T.W. Bynum. The Foundation of Computer Ethics. Computer and Society, 30(2), June 2000 (cited as Bynum, 1999).Google Scholar
  2. T.W. Bynum. Ethics and the Information Revolution. In G. Collste, editor, Ethics in the Age of Information Technology. Linköping, Centre for Applied Ethics, 2000a.Google Scholar
  3. T. Dare. Applied Ethics, Challenges To. In R. Chadwick, editor, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Volume I, pp. 183–190. Academic Press, San Diego, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. F. Dyson. The Sun, the Genome, and the Internet. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. L. Floridi. Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundation of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology Journal, 1: 33–52, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. B. Gert. Morality. Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. K. Gorniak-Kocikowska. The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics. In T.W. Bynum and S. Rogerson, editors, Global Information Ethics, pp. 177–190. Opragen, Guildford, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. D. Gotterbarn. Computer Ethics: Responsibility Regained. In D. Johnson and H. Nissenbaum, editors, Computers, Ethics and Social Values, pp. 18–24. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. R.M. Hare. Ethics. In R.M. Hare, editor, Essays on the Moral Concepts, pp. 39–54. MacMillan, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. R.M. Hare. Why Do Applied Ethics?. In R.M. Hare, editor, Essays in Ethical Theory, pp. 1–13. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. J. Hospers. An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. Routledge, London, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. D. Johnson. Do Engineers have Social Responsibilities?. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9: 21–34, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. D. Johnson. Computer Ethics. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddler River, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. D. Johnson. Computer Ethics in the 21st Century. Keynote address delivers at the Ethicomp 99 International Conference on the Social and Ethical Impacts of Information Technologies. Rome, Luiss Guido Carli University, October 6-8, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. M. Kaku. Visions. How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st century and Beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. I. Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, translation by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, http://www.swan.ac.uk/poli/texts/kant/kanta.htm, preface, orig. ed., 1785.Google Scholar
  17. T. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.Google Scholar
  18. I. Lakatos. Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Philosophical Papers Vol. II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. A. MacIntyre. Does Applied Ethics Rest on a Mistake? The Monist, 67: 498–513, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. A. Marturano. Bionics: A Link between Bioethics and Computer Ethics. In T.W. Bynum, J. van den Hoven, D. Gotterbarn and S. Rogerson, editors, Proceeding of Ethicomp 98. Rotterdam, Cict - Erasmus Universiteit, 1998.Google Scholar
  21. D. McNaughton. Moral Vision. An Introduction to Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
  22. J. Moore. What Is Computer Ethics?. In T.W. Bynum, editor, Computers and Ethics, pp. 266–275. Blackwell, London, 1985.Google Scholar
  23. J. Rifkin. The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World, J P Tarcher/Putnam, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. B. Russell. The Scientific Outlook. Allen & Unwin, London, 1931.Google Scholar
  25. B. Russell. History of Western Philosophy. Allen & Unwin, London, 1946.Google Scholar
  26. S. Toulmin. The Tyranny of Principles. The Hastings Center Report, 11(6): 31–38, 1981.Google Scholar
  27. P. Virilio. La Bombe Informatique. Éditions Galileé, Paris, 1999.Google Scholar
  28. N. Wiener. The Human Use of Human Beings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1950.Google Scholar
  29. N. Wiener. Invention: The Care and Feedings of Ideas. MIT Press, Boston, 1993 (1954).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Marturano
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Furness CollegeLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations