Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 3–30 | Cite as

Antecedents and Consequences of Real-Time Affective Reactions at Work

  • Cynthia D. Fisher
Article

Abstract

Based partly on Weiss and Cropanzano's (H. M. Weiss & R. Cropanzano, 1996) Affective Events Theory, hypotheses were stated about likely antecedents and consequences of positive and negative real-time affective reactions at work. Somewhat different antecedents and consequences were predicted for positive as opposed to negative affective reactions. Affective reactions were operationalized as the average of up to 50 reports of momentary positive and negative feelings collected at work over a 2-week period. Structural equation analyses suggest that the data are consistent with the theoretical model proposed. As expected, job characteristics and positive dispositional affectivity predict positive affective reactions, role conflict and negative affectivity predict negative affective reactions, positive affective reactions predict affective commitment and helping behavior, and intention to leave is predicted by attitudes rather than by affective reactions. The results are consistent with Affective Events Theory as well as with 2-domain models that propose different causes and consequences of positive versus negative affect.

Affective Events Theory emotion affect at work 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alliger, G. M., & Williams, K. J. (1993). Using signal-contingent experience sampling methodology to study work in the field: A discussion and illustration examining task perceptions and mood. Personnel Psychology, 46, 525–549.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, R. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48, 97–125.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, L. F. (1997). The relationships among momentary emotion experiences, personality descriptions, and retrospective ratings of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1100–1110.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experience in social context. Cognition and Emotion 12, 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303–316.Google Scholar
  9. Brief, A. P. (1998). Attitudes in and around organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, G. M., Robinson, B. S., & Webster, J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 193–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., & Roberson, L. (1995). Cookies, disposition, and job attitudes: The effects of positive mood-inducing events and negative affectivity on job satisfaction in a field experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 55–62.Google Scholar
  12. Brief, A. P., & Roberson, L. (1989). Job attitude organization: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 717–727.Google Scholar
  13. Briner, R. B. (1999). The neglect and importance of emotion at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 323–346.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, K. W., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). It's a function of time: A review of the process approach to behavioral medicine research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 109–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855.Google Scholar
  18. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  19. Carlson, M., Charlin, V., & Miller, N. (1988). Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 211–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1988). Mood and the mundane: Relations between daily life events and self-reported mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 296–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Curry, J. P., Wakefield, D. S., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). On the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 847–858.Google Scholar
  22. Cutler, S. E., Larsen, R. J., & Bunce, S. C. (1996). Repressive coping style and the experience and recall of emotion: A naturalistic study of daily affect. Journal of Personality, 64, 379–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130–141.Google Scholar
  24. Donovan, M. A. (1999). Do job affect and job satisfaction differentially predict important organizational behaviors? Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  25. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  26. Farkas, A. J., & Tetrick, L. E. (1989). A three-wave longitudinal analysis of the causal ordering or satisfaction and commitment on turnover decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 855–868.Google Scholar
  27. Fisher, C. D. (1997). Emotions at work: What do people feel and how should we measure it? Presented at the Second Biennial Australian Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  28. Fisher, C. D., & Gitelson, R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the correlates of role conflict and ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 320–333.Google Scholar
  29. Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322.Google Scholar
  30. Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Frijda, N. H. (1993). Moods, emotion episodes, and emotions. In M. Lewis & I. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 381–403.) New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Gannon, L., Vaux, A., Rhodes, K., & Luchetta, T. (1992). A two-domain model of well-being: Everyday events, social support, and gender-related personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 288–301.Google Scholar
  33. George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299–307.Google Scholar
  34. George, J. M. (1992). The role of personality in organizational life: Issues and evidence. Journal of Management, 18, 185–213.Google Scholar
  35. George, J. M. (1996). Trait and state affect. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 145–171.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good–doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work–organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1996). Motivational agendas in the workplace: The effects of feelings on focus of attention and work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 75–109.Google Scholar
  38. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  39. Hart, P. M., Wearing, A. J., & Headley, B. (1994). Perceived quality of life, personality, and work experiences: Construct validation of the Police Daily Hassles and Uplifts Scales. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 283–311.Google Scholar
  40. Härtel, C. E. J., Fisher, C. D., & Härtel, G. F. (1998). Measuring work emotions in real time. Paper presented in the symposium Emotion at work: New research directions at the Society of Australasian Social Psychologists, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  41. Hedges, S. M., Jandorf, L., & Stone, A. A. (1985). Meaning of daily mood assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 428–434.Google Scholar
  42. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Hom, P. W., Caranikas-Walker, F., Prussia, G. E., & Griffeth, R. W. (1992). A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 890–909.Google Scholar
  44. House, R. J., & Wigdor, L. A. (1967). Herzberg's dual-factor theory of job satisfaction and motivation: A review of the evidence and a criticism. Personnel Psychology, 20, 369–390.Google Scholar
  45. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Ironson, G. H., Smith, P. C., Brannick, M. T., Gibson, W. M., & Paul, K. B. (1989). Construction of a job in General Scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 193–200.Google Scholar
  47. Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 1–53.Google Scholar
  48. Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 16–78.Google Scholar
  49. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25.) New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 1–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kraiger, K., Billings, R. S., & Isen, A. M. (1989). The influence of positive affective states on task perception and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 12–25.Google Scholar
  52. Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Larsen, R. J. (1992). Neuroticism and selective encoding and recall of symptoms: Evidence from a combined concurrent-retrospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 480–488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In H. T. Reis (Ed.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Vol. 15. Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction (pp. 41–56.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19, 51–89.Google Scholar
  58. Martin, C. L., & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group and Organization Management, 21, 84–105.Google Scholar
  59. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.Google Scholar
  60. McFarland, C., Ross, M., & DeCourville, N. (1989). Women's theories of menstruation and biases in recall of menstrual symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 522–531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.Google Scholar
  62. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.Google Scholar
  63. Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Cronk, R. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421–448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.Google Scholar
  65. Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157–164.Google Scholar
  66. Organ, D. W., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Social Justice Research, 6, 5–18.Google Scholar
  67. Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1985). Cognition versus affect in measures of job satisfaction. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 241–253.Google Scholar
  68. Ottati, V. C., Steenbergen, M. R., & Riggle, E. (1992). The cognitive and affective components of political attitudes: Measuring the determinants of candidate evaluations. Political Behaviour, 14, 423–442.Google Scholar
  69. Parkinson, B., Briner, R. B., Reynolds, S., & Totterdell, P. (1995). Time frames for mood: Relations between momentary and generalized ratings of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 331–339.Google Scholar
  70. Pekrun, R., & Frese, M. (1992). Emotions in work and achievement. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 153–200.Google Scholar
  71. Rice, R. W., McFarlin, D. B., & Bennett, D. E. (1989). Standards of comparison and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 591–598.Google Scholar
  72. Rizzo, J., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150–163.Google Scholar
  73. Roseman, L. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915.Google Scholar
  74. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341–357.Google Scholar
  75. Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (2000). Affective states in job characteristics theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 131–146.Google Scholar
  77. Sandelands, L. E. (1988). The concept of work feeling. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 18, 437–457.Google Scholar
  78. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In K. Fiedler, & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44–62.) Toronto: Hogrefe International.Google Scholar
  79. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.Google Scholar
  81. Stallings, M. C., Dunham, C. C., Gatz, M., Baker, L. A., & Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Relationships among life events and psychological well-being: More evidence for a two factor theory of well-being. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 16, 104–199.Google Scholar
  82. Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 56–77.Google Scholar
  83. Teasdale, J. D., & Fogarty, S. J. (1979). Differential effects of induced mood on retrieval of pleasant and unpleasant events from episodic memory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 88, 248–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  85. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analystic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293.Google Scholar
  86. Thomas, D. L., & Diener, E. (1990). Memory accuracy in the recall of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 291–297.Google Scholar
  87. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (1992). Examining the causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Management, 18, 153–167.Google Scholar
  88. Watson, D. (1988a). Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their relation to daily health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1020–1030.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Watson, D. (1988b). The vicissitudes of mood measurement: Effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 128–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Watson, D., & Slack, A. K. (1993). General factors of affective temperament and their relation to job satisfaction over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 181–202.Google Scholar
  93. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.Google Scholar
  94. Weiss, H. M. (in press). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs, and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review.Google Scholar
  95. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.Google Scholar
  96. Weiss, H. M., Nicholas, J. P., & Daus, C. S. (1999). An examination of the joint effects of affective experiences and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experiences over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 1–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Zautra, A. J., Potter, P. T., & Reich, J. W. (1997). The independence of affects is context-dependent: An integrative model of the relationship between positive and negative affect. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics: Focus on Adult Development, 17, 75–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia D. Fisher
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessBond UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations