Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry

  • Ronald D. Anderson
Article

Keywords

Science Teaching Reform Science Teaching 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R.D. (1983). A consolidation and appraisal of science meta-analyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 497-509.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R.D. (1996). Study of curriculum reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  3. Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (1994). Lessons learned: How collaboration helped middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 539-551.Google Scholar
  4. Bredderman, T. (1982). Elementary school science process programs: A meta-analysis of evaluation studies. Final report of NSF-RISE Grant SED 79-18717.Google Scholar
  5. Druva, C.A. & Anderson, R.D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 467-479.Google Scholar
  6. Duschl, R.A. & Gitomer, D.H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37-73.Google Scholar
  7. Duschl, R.A. & Hamilton, R.J. (1998). Conceptual change in science and in the learning of science. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), The International Handbook of Science Education. (pp. 1047-1065). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Flick, L.B. (1995). Complex classrooms: A synthesis of research on inquiry teaching methods and explicit teaching strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco. (ED 383 563).Google Scholar
  9. Gitomer, D.H. & Duschl, R.A. (1998). Emerging Issues and Practices in Science Assessment. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), The International Handbook of Science Education. (pp. 791-810). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Haury, D.L. (1993). Teaching science through inquiry. ERIC CSMEE Digest, March. (ED 359 048).Google Scholar
  11. Heywood, J. & Heywood, S. (1992). The training of student-teachers in discovery methods of instruction and learning. Research in Teacher Education Monograph Series. (No. 1/92) Dublin, Ireland: Department of Teacher Education, The University of Dublin. (ED 358 034).Google Scholar
  12. Hodson, D. (1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24(1&2), 41-52.Google Scholar
  13. Huveyda, B., NEED. (1994). The effect of the inquiry teaching method on biochemistry and science process skill achievements. Biochemical Education, 22(1), 29-32.Google Scholar
  14. Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483-497.Google Scholar
  15. Ladewski, B.J., Krajcik, J.S., & Harvey, C.L. (1994). A middle grade science teacher's emerging understanding of project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 499-515.Google Scholar
  16. Layman, J.W., Ochoa, G., Heikkinen, H. (1996). Inquiry and learning: Realizing science standards in the classroom. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. (ED 403 154).Google Scholar
  17. Lott, G.W. (1983). The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizers upon student outcomes in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 437-451.Google Scholar
  18. Maor, D. & Taylor, P.C. Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 839-854.Google Scholar
  19. Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Meyer, K.M. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 517-538.Google Scholar
  20. Roth, W. M. & Bowen, G.M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13(1), 73-128.Google Scholar
  21. Rubin, R.L. & Norman, J.T. (1992). Systematic modeling versus the learning cycle: Comparative effects on integrated science process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 715-727.Google Scholar
  22. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1-15.Google Scholar
  23. Shymansky, J.A., Kyle, W.C., & Alport, J.M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387-404.Google Scholar
  24. Stake, R. & Easley, J., (1978). Case Studies in Science Education, Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  25. Weinstein, T., Boulanger, F.D., & Walberg, H.J. (1982). Science curriculum effects in high school: a quantitative synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(6), 511-522.Google Scholar
  26. Welch, W.W., Klopfer, L.E., Aikenhead, G.S., & Robinson, J.T. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65, 33-50.Google Scholar
  27. Wise, K.C. & Okey, J.R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 419-435.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald D. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ColoradoBoulderU.S.A

Personalised recommendations