Advertisement

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 167–177 | Cite as

Measuring biological diversity using Euclidean metrics

  • Stephane Champely
  • Daniel Chessel
Article

Abstract

We study the complementary use of Rao's theory of diversity (1986) and Euclidean metrics. The first outcome is a Euclidean diversity coefficient. This index allows to measure the diversity in a set of species beyond their relative abundances using biological information about the dissimilarity between the species. It also involves geometrical interpretations and graphical representations. Moreover, several populations (e.g., different sites) can be compared using a Euclidean dissimilarity coefficient derived from the Euclidean diversity coefficient. These proposals are used to compare breeding bird communities living in comparable habitat gradients in different parts of the world.

Euclidean metrics multidimensional scaling Rao's dissimilarity coefficient Rao's diversity coefficient 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. d'Aubigny, G. (1988) The additive decomposition of some entropy functions and (constrained-) ordination methods. Proceedings of the XVIth International Biometric Conference, Namur, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Blondel, J., Vuillermier, F., Marcus, L.F., and Terouanne, E. (1984) Is there ecomorphological convergence among mediterranean bird communities of Chile, California and France? In: Evolutionary Biology, M.K. Hecht, B. Wallace, and R.J. MacIntyre (eds), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 141–213.Google Scholar
  3. Gower, J.C. (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53, 325–88.Google Scholar
  4. Gower, J.C. (1982) Euclidean distance geometry. Mathematical Scientist, 7, 1–14.Google Scholar
  5. Gower, J.C. and Legendre, P. (1986) Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilary coefficients. Journal of Classification, 3, 5–48.Google Scholar
  6. Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (1982) Diversity as a concept and its measurement. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 548–61.Google Scholar
  7. Rao, C.R. (1982) Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theoretical Population Biology, 21, 24–43.Google Scholar
  8. Rao, C.R. (1986) Rao's axiomatization of diversity measures. In: Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences Volume 7, S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson, and C.R. Read (eds), pp. 614–17.Google Scholar
  9. Rosen, J.B. (1960) The gradient projection method for nonlinear programming. Part I: linear constraints. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 8, 181–217.Google Scholar
  10. Solow, A.R. and Polasky, S. (1994) Measuring biological diversity. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1, 95–107.Google Scholar
  11. Thioulouse, J., Chessel, D., Dolédec, S., and Olivier, J.-M. (1997) ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing, 7, 75–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephane Champely
    • 1
  • Daniel Chessel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SportsUniversity Lyon 1Villeurbanne cedexFrance
  2. 2.Biométrie et Biologie EvolutiveUniversity Lyon 1UMRFrance

Personalised recommendations