Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Association and Dissociation Characteristics of Polymer/DNA Complexes Used for Gene Delivery

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The DNA association/dissociation properties of water-soluble cationic methacrylate polymers with closely related structures (poly(2-dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) [p(DMAEMA)], poly(2-(trimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate chloride) [p(TMAEMA)]) and the frequently used transfectant poly(L-lysine) were studied to gain a better insight into their transfection characteristics.

Methods. Association of DNA with different polymers and dissociation of the complexes, achieved by adding an excess of anionic polymers or salt, were studied by using spectroscopic techniques (fluorescence, circular dichroism (CD)), agarose gel electrophoresis and an enzymatic assay (DNase I treatment). The transfection efficiency of the polyplexes was evaluated in tissue culture with OVCAR-3 cells.

Results. Plasmid DNA complexed with either poly(L-lysine) or p(DMAEMA) was protected against digestion by DNase I. Fluorescence and CD spectroscopy as well as gel electrophoresis revealed that p(DMAEMA) with a relatively high molecular weight and poly(L-lysine) have similar DNA association/dissociation characteristics. Therefore, differences in transfection potential of the polyplexes cannot be ascribed to differences in binding characteristics, but are probably caused by other factors. As compared with the other polymers, p(TMAEMA) has a high affinity for DNA as was concluded from the observation that poly(aspartic acid) was unable to fully dissociate complexes containing this polymer. This fact might very well explain the low transfection efficiency of these polyplexes. p(DMAEM A) with a relatively low molecular weight probably has a low affinity for DNA, which might explain both the formation of DNA aggregates Ψ-DNA) and the low transfection potential obtained when using this polymer.

Conclusions. DNA association/dissociation studies shed light on the preferred characteristics of polymeric transfectants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. W. Zauner, M. Ogris, and E. Wagner. Polylysine-based transfection systems utilizing receptor-mediated delivery. Adv. Drug. Del. Rev. 30:97–113 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Van de Wetering, J. Y. Cherng, H. Talsma, and W. E. Hennink. Relation between transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)/plasmid complexes. J. Contr. Rel. 49:59–69 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Kavanov and V. A. Kavanov. DNA complexes with polycations for delivery of genetic material into cells. Bioconj. Chem. 6:7–20 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. L. Felgner, Y. Barenholz, J. P. Behr, S. H. Cheng, P. Cullis, L. Huang, J. A. Jessee, L. Seymour, F. Szoka, A. R. Thierry, E. Wagner, and G. Wu. Nomenclature of synthetic gene delivery systems. Human Gene Ther. 8:511–512 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Van de Wetering, J. Y. Cherng, H. Talsma, D. J. A. Crommelin, and W. E. Hennink. 2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate based (co)polymers as gene transfer agents. J. Contr. Rel. 53:145–153 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Van de Wetering, E. E. Moret, N. M. E. Schuurmans-Nieuwen-broek, M. J. Van Steenbergen, and W. E. Hennink. Structure-activity relationship of water-soluble cationic methacrylate/methacrylamide polymers for non-viral gene delivery (published).

  7. O. Boussif, F. Lezoualc'h, M. A. Zanta, M. D. Mergny, D1. Scherman, B. Demenei, and Behr. A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethyleneimine. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 47:1160–1165 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Bout, D. Valerio, and B. J. Scholte. In vivo transfer and expression of the LacZ gene in the mouse lung. Exp. Lung Res. 19:193–202 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Y. Cherng, P. Van de Wetering, H. Talsma, D. J. A. Crommelin, and W. E. Hennink. Effect on size and serum proteins on transfection efficiency of poly(2(-dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-plasmid nanoparticles. Pharm. Res. 13:1045–1049 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Katayose, and K. Kataoka. Water-soluble polyion complex associates of DNA and poly(ethyleneglycol)-poly(L-lysine) block copolymer. Bioconj. Chem. 8:702–707 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. C. Hamilton, R. C. Young, W. M. McKoy, K. R. Grotzinger, J. A. Green, E. W. Chu, J. Whang-Penn, A. M. Rogan, W. R. Green, and R. F. Ozols. Characterization of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line (NIH:OVCAR-3) with androgen and estrogen receptors. Cancer Res. 43:5379–5389 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Sambrook, E. F. Fritsch, T. C. Maniatis, and Nolan (Ed). In: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor laboratory Press: New York, pp. 16.66–16.67 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. A. Scudeiro, R. H. Schoemaker, K. D. Paull, A. Monks, S. Tierney, T. H. Nofziger, M. J. Currens, D. Seniff, and M. R. Boyd. Evaluation of a soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth and drug sensitivity in culture using human and other tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 48:4827–4833 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. M. Gray, R. L. Ratliff, and M. R. Vaughan. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy of DNA. Methods Enzymol., 211:389–405 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Akao, T. Fukumoto, H. Ihara, and A. Ito. Conformational change in DNA induced by cationic bilayer membranes. FEBS Lett. 391:215–218 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Weiskopf, and H. J. Li. Poly(L-lysine)-DNA interactions in NaCl solutions: B → C and B → Ψ transitions. Biopolymers. 16:669–684 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Ghirlando, E. J. Watchel, T. Arad, and A. Minsky. DNA packaging induced by micellar aggregates: a novel in vitro DNA condensation system. Biochemistry 31:7110–7119 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. R. Middaugh, R. K. Evans, D. L. Montgomery, and D. R. Casimiro. Analysis of plasmid DNA from a pharmaceutical perspective. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:130–146 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. I. Ivanov, L. E. Minchenkova, A. K. Schyolkina, and A. I. Poletayev. Different conformations of double stranded nucleic acid in solution as revealed by circular dichroism. Biopolymers 12:89–110 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Van de Wetering, N. J. Zuidam, M. J. van Steenbergen, O. A. G. J. van der Houwen, W. J. M. Underberg, and W. E. Hennink. A mechanistic study of the hydrolytic stability o poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate). Macromolecules 31:8063–8068 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. X. Tang, and F. C. Szoka. The influence of polymer structure on the interactions of cationic polymers with DNA and morphology of the resulting complexes. Gene Ther. 4:823–832 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. J. Eastman, J. Siegel, A. E. Tousignant, S. H. Smith, S. H. Cheng, and R. K. Scheule. Biophysical characterization of cationic lipid:DNA complexes. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1325:41–62 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. P. Haughland. MTZ Spence (Ed). In: Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals. Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), p. 150 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. R. Dash, V. Toncheva, E. Schacht, and L. W. Seymour. Synthetic polymers for vectorial delivery of DNA: characterization of polymer-DNA complexes by photon correlation spectroscopy and stability to nuclease degradation and disruption by polyanions in vitro. J. Contr. Rel. 48:269–276 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Katayose, and K. Kataoka. Remarkable increase in nuclease resistance of plasmid DNA through supramolecular assembly with poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(L-lysine) block copolymer. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:160–163 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.-P. Yang, and L. Huang. Time-dependent maturation of cationic liposome-DNA complex for serum resistance. Gene Ther. 5:380–587 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. T. Wink, J. de Beer, W. E. Hennink, A. Bult, and W. P. van Bennekom. Interaction between plasmid DNA and cationic polymers studied with surface plasmon resonance spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 71:801–805 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Faculty of Pharmacy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Carmen Arigita, Nicolaas Jan Zuidam, Daan J. A. Crommelin & Wim E. Hennink

Authors
  1. Carmen Arigita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolaas Jan Zuidam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daan J. A. Crommelin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wim E. Hennink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Arigita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arigita, C., Zuidam, N.J., Crommelin, D.J.A. et al. Association and Dissociation Characteristics of Polymer/DNA Complexes Used for Gene Delivery. Pharm Res 16, 1534–1541 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015096302720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015096302720

Search

Navigation