Advertisement

Journal of Electronic Testing

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 261–271 | Cite as

An FPGA-Based Approach for Speeding-Up Fault Injection Campaigns on Safety-Critical Circuits

  • P. Civera
  • L. Macchiarulo
  • M. Rebaudengo
  • M. Sonza Reorda
  • M. Violante
Article

Abstract

In this paper we describe an FPGA-based approach to speed-up fault injection campaigns for the evaluation of the fault-tolerance of VLSI circuits. Suitable techniques are proposed, allowing emulating the effects of faults and observing faulty behavior. The proposed approach combines the efficiency of hardware-based techniques, and the flexibility of simulation-based techniques. Experimental results are provided showing that significant speed-up figures can be achieved with respect to state-of-the-art simulation-based fault injection techniques.

fault injection FPGA-based fault emulation dependability evaluation fault tolerant circuits single event upset 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ADM-XRC PCI Mezzanine card User Guide Version 1.2, ALPHA DATA Parallel Systems Ltd., http://www.alphadata.co.uk/Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Antoni, R. Leveugle, and B. Feh´er, “Using Run-time Reconfiguration for Fault Injection in Hardware Prototypes,” IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, 2000, pp. 405–413.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Arlat, M. Aguera, L. Amat, Y. Crouzet, J.C. Fabre, J.-C Laprie, E. Martins, and D. Powell, “Fault Injection for Dependability Validation: A Methodology and Some Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, Feb. 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Benso, P. Prinetto, M. Rebaudengo, and M. Sonza Reorda, “EXFI: A Low Cost Fault Injection System for Embedded Microprocessor-Based Boards,” ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 626–634, Oct. 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Benso, M. Rebaudengo, L. Impagliazzo, and P. Marmo, “Fault-List Collapsing for Fault Injection Experiments,” in RAMS'98: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1998, pp. 383–388.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Carreira, H. Madeira, and J. Silva, “Xception: Software Fault Injection and Monitoring in Processor Functional Units,” in Conference on Dependable Computing for Critical Applications, 1995, pp. 135–149.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.T. Cheng, S.Y. Huang, and W.J. Dai, “Fault Emulation: A New Methodology for Fault Grading,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1487–1495, Oct. 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Corno, M. Sonza Reorda, and G. Squillero, “RT-Level ITC 99 Benchmarks and First ATPG Results,” IEEE Design & Test of Computers, pp. 44–53, July–Aug. 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.A. Delong, B.W. Johnson, and J.A. Profeta III, “A Fault InjectionTechnique forVHDLBehavioral-Level Models,” IEEE Design & Test of Computers, pp. 24–33, Winter 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Gonzales and L. Berrojo, “Supporting Fault Tolerance in an Industrial Environment: The AMATISTA approach,” in IEEE International On-line Testing Workshop, 2001, pp. 178–183.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Hungse, E.M. Rudnick, J.H. Patel, R.K. Iyer, and G.S. Choi, “A Gate-Level Simulation Environment for Alpha-Particle-Induced Transient Faults,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1248–1256, Nov. 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.A. Hwang, J.H. Hong, and C.W. Wu, “Sequential Circuit Fault Simulation Using Logic Emulation,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 724–736, Aug. 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.K. Iyer and D. Tang, “Experimental Analysis of Computer System Dependability,” in Fault-Tolerant Computer System Design, D.K. Pradhan (Ed.), Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Jenn, J. Arlat, M. Rimen, J. Ohlsson, and J. Karlsson, “Fault Injection into VHDL Models: The MEFISTO Tool,” in Proc. FTCS-24, 1994, pp. 66–75.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G.A. Kanawati, N.A. Kanawati, and J.A. Abraham, “FERRARI: A Flexible Software-Based Fault and Error Injection System,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 248–260, Feb. 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Karlsson, P. Liden, P. Dahlgren, R. Johansson, and U. Gunneflo, “Using Heavy-Ion Radiation to Validate Fault-Handling Mechanisms,” IEEE Micro, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 8–32, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Leveugle, “Fault Injection in VHDL Descriptions and Emulation,” in IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, 2000, pp. 414–419.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Nikolaidis, “Time Redundancy Based Soft-Error Tolerance to Rescue Nanometer Technologies,” in Proc. IEEE 17th VLSI Test Symposium, 1999, pp. 86–94Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Parrotta, M. Rebaudengo, M. Sonza Reorda, and M. Violante, “New Techniques for Accelerating Fault Injection in VHDL Descriptions,” in IEEE International On-line Testing Workshop, 2000, pp. 61–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Civera
    • 1
  • L. Macchiarulo
    • 1
  • M. Rebaudengo
    • 2
  • M. Sonza Reorda
    • 2
  • M. Violante
    • 2
  1. 1.Dip. ElettronicaPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Dip. Automatica e InformaticaPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations