International Environmental Agreements

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Burden Sharing and Fairness Principles in International Climate Policy

  • Lasse Ringius
  • Asbjørn Torvanger
  • Arild Underdal
Article

Abstract

One of the major challenges facing participants in the global climate change negotiations is to find a scheme of burden sharing that can be accepted as "fair" by all or at least most governments. In this article we first explore which basic principles of fairness seem to be sufficiently widely recognized to serve as a normative basis for such a scheme. We then examine a set of proposals for differentiating obligations that have been submitted by governments in the negotiations leading up to the Kyoto Protocol to see which principles have been honored. In the concluding section we discuss the implications of our analysis for the design of more specific burden sharing rules.

burden sharing climate agreements fairness principles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrett, S. (1992), 'Acceptable Allocations of Tradable Carbon Emission Entitlements in a Global Warming Treaty', in Combating Global Warming. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  2. Bartsch, U. and B. Müller (2000), Fossil Fuels in a Changing Climate – Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol and Developing Country Participation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, M. and M. den Elzen (1998), 'The Brazilian Proposal and other Options for International Burden Sharing', paper presented at a special event at UNFCCC/COP-4 in Buenos Aires, 5 November 1998, Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. Blok, K., G. J. M Phylipsen and J. W. Bode, (1997), 'The Triptique Approach: Burden Differentiation of CO2 Emission Reduction Among European Union Member States', Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Gault, J., C. Spierer, J.-L. Bertholet and B. Karbassioun (1999), 'How Does the OPEC Allocate Quotes?', Journal of Energy Finance and Development 4(2), 137–148.Google Scholar
  6. March, J.G. and J. P. Olsen (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. OECD (1974), Problems in Transfrontier Pollution. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  8. OECD (1979), OECD and the Environment. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  9. Parson, E. A. and R. J. Zeckhauser (1995), 'Equal Measures or Fair Burdens: Negotiating Environmental Agreements in an Unequal World', in H. Lee, ed., Shaping National Responses to Climate Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ringius, L., A. Torvanger and B. Holtsmark (1998), 'Can Multi-Criteria Rules Fairly Distribute Climate Burdens – OECD Results from Three Burden Sharing Rules', Energy Policy 26(10), 777–793.Google Scholar
  11. Ringius, L. (1999), 'Differentiation, Leaders, and Fairness: Negotiating Climate Commitments in the European Community', International Negotiation 4(2), 133–166.Google Scholar
  12. Ringius, L. (2001), Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rose, A. (1992), 'Equity Considerations of Tradable Carbon Emission Entitlements', in Combating Global Warming. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  14. Rose, A., B. Stevens, J. Edmonds and M. Wise (1998), 'International Equity and Differentiation in Global Warming Policy', Environmental and Resource Economics 12(1), 25–51.Google Scholar
  15. Torvanger, A., T. Berntsen, J. S. F uglestvedt, B. Holtsmark, L. Ringius and A. Aaheim (1996), 'Exploring Distribution of Commitments – A Follow-up to the Berlin Mandate', CICERO Report, No. 3, Oslo.Google Scholar
  16. Torvanger, A. and O. Godal (2000), 'A Survey of Differentiation Methods for National Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets', Temanord Report, No. 551, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, and CICERO Report, No. 1999:5, CICERO, Oslo.Google Scholar
  17. Underdal, A. (1998), 'Modelling International Negotiations: The Case of Global Climate Change', paper presented at the Third Pan-European Conference on International Relations, Vienna, 16–19 September.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1995), 'Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Comments from Parties', note by the interim secretariat, Addendum. FCCC/AGBM/1995/Misc.1/Add.1, 29 September.Google Scholar
  19. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1996), 'Strengthening the Commitments in Article 4.2(a) and (b); Quantified Emission Limitation and Reduction Objectives within Specified Time-Frames; Review of Possible Indicators to Define Criteria for Differentiation among Annex I Parties', note by the Secretariat. FCCC/AGBM/1996/7, 8 July.Google Scholar
  20. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1996), 'Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Proposals from Parties', note by the secretariat, Addendum. FCCC/AGBM/1996/Misc.2/ Add.2, 15 November.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1996), 'Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Proposals from Parties', note by the secretariat, Addendum. FCCC/AGBM/1996/Misc.2/ Add.4, 10 December.Google Scholar
  22. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997), 'Framework Compilation of Proposals from Parties for the Elements of a Protocol or Another Legal Instrument', note by the Chairman. FCCC/AGBM/1997/2, 31 January.Google Scholar
  23. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997), 'Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Proposals from Parties', note by the secretariat. FCCC/AGBM/1997/Misc.1, 19 February.Google Scholar
  24. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997), 'Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Proposals from Parties', note by the secretariat. FCCC/AGBM/1997/Misc.1/Add.1, 26 February.Google Scholar
  25. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997), 'Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Additional proposals from Parties, Addendum', note by the secretariat. FCCC/AGBM/1997/ Misc.1/Add.3, 30 May.Google Scholar
  26. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997), 'Implementation of the Berlin Mandate, Proposals from Parties', note by the secretariat. FCCC/AGBM/1997/Misc.1/Add.6, 23 October.Google Scholar
  27. Zartman, I. W., D. Druckman, L. Jensen, D. Pruitt and P. Young (1996), 'Negotiation as a Search for Justice', International Negotiation 1(1), 79–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lasse Ringius
    • 1
  • Asbjørn Torvanger
    • 2
  • Arild Underdal
    • 2
  1. 1.UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and EnvironmentRisø National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.CICEROOsloNorway (Author for correspondnece: E-mail

Personalised recommendations