Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 39–51 | Cite as

Buying into the food system: Trends in food retailing in the US and implications for local foods



The contemporary US food systemis characterized by both an unprecedentedconcentration of corporate control as well as afragmentation of sourcing and marketingprocesses, introducing both new constraints andnew opportunities for more localized foodsystems. The purpose of our study is to explorethese issues by investigating three keyquestions. First, what are the key trends inthe US grocery industry? Second, how dodifferent kinds of food outlets choose,procure, and promote food products? Finally,what are the implications of recent trends inthe food retailing process for strengtheninglocal flows of the production, distribution,and consumption of food? Background informationon the grocery industry and the results ofseven open-ended interviews conducted withowners and managers of grocery stores in oneupstate New York county indicate that theretailing process differs in complex ways fromstore to store and in most aspects cannot beinferred from store type. The paper concludeswith a discussion of the implications of ourfindings for local food system efforts,specifically in terms of new collaborationsamong producers, distributors, retailers, andshoppers, who play an indispensable role indeveloping viable alternatives to increasingcorporate control.

Food retail Food system Grocery stores Local foods Packaged goods industry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, P. (ed.) (1993). Food for the Future: The Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  2. Ashman, L., J. de la Vega, M. Dohan, A. Fisher, R. Hippler, and B. Romain (1993). Seeds of Change: Strategies for Food Security for the Inner City. UCLA Urban Planning Department.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, R. (1997). “Supermarket futures.” In P. Falk and C. Campbell (eds.), The Shopping Experience (pp. 92–110). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman (1997). “From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of northern California.” Sociologia Ruralis 37: 3–20.Google Scholar
  5. Burch, D. and J. Goss (1999). “Global sourcing and retail chains: Shifting relationships of production in Australian agri-foods.” Rural Sociology 64: 334–350.Google Scholar
  6. DeLind, L. (1993). “Market niches, 'cul de sacs', and social context: Alternative systems of food production.” Culture and Agriculture 47: 7–12.Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, J. (1999). “Reflexive accumulation and global restructuring: Retailers and cultural processes in the Australian poultry industry.” Rural Sociology 64: 320–333.Google Scholar
  8. Economic Research Service (1997). Food Consumption, Prices and Expenditures. Stock #89015B, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  9. Food Marketing Institute (1992). Alternative Store Formats: Competing in the Nineties. Report #9-511, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  10. Food Marketing Institute (1998). Trends in the United States: Consumer Attitudes and the Supermarket.Google Scholar
  11. Gottlieb, R. and A. Fisher (1996). “Community food security and environmental justice: Searching for a common discourse.” Agriculture and Human Values13: 23–32.Google Scholar
  12. Grannovetter, M. (1985). “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.Google Scholar
  13. Hassenein, N. (1999). Changing the way America farms: Knowledge and community in the sustainable agriculture movement. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  14. Heffernan, W. D. (1999). Consolidation in the Food and Agriculture System. Report to the National Farmers Union. Washington, DC, February.Google Scholar
  15. Hendrickson, M., W. D. Heffernan, P. H. Howard, and J. B. Heffernan (2001). Consolidation in Food Retailing and Dairy: Implications for Farmers and Consumers in a Global Food System. Report to the National Farmers Union. Washington, DC, January 8.Google Scholar
  16. Hennessy, T. (2000). “Fresh ideas,” Progressive Grocer, March 2000: 85-91.Google Scholar
  17. Hinrichs, C. C. (2000). “The embeddedness of local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural markets.” Journal of Rural Studies16: 295–303.Google Scholar
  18. Janoff, B. (1999). “Supermarkets go au naturel,” Progressive Grocer, March 1999: 75-80.Google Scholar
  19. Kahn, B. E. and L. McAlister (1997). Grocery Revolution: The New Focus on the Consumer. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  20. Kloppenburg J. Jr., J. Hendrickson, and G. W. Stevenson (1996). “Coming into the Foodshed.” Agriculture and Human Values 13: 33–42.Google Scholar
  21. Kneen, B. (1993). From Land to Mouth: Understanding the Food System. Toronto: NC Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lyson, T. A. and G. W. Gillespie Jr. (1995). “Producing more milk on fewer farms: Neoclassical and neostructural explanations for changes in the dairy industry.” Rural Sociology 60: 493–504.Google Scholar
  23. Lyson, T. A. and J. Green (1999). “The agricultural marketscape: A framework for sustaining agriculture and communities in the northeast.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 15: 133–150.Google Scholar
  24. Marsden, T., A. Flynn, and M. Harrison (2000). Consuming Interests: The Social Provision of Foods. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  25. McMichael, P. (2000). “The power of food.” Agriculture and Human Values 17: 21–33.Google Scholar
  26. Progressive Grocer (2000). The Progressive Grocer Annual Report.Google Scholar
  27. Torres, R. (1999). An Analysis of the Economic, Social, and Agricultural Correlates of “New Agriculture” in New York State at the Town Level. Unpublished Masters' Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  28. Wellman, D. (2000a). “Natural high.” Supermarket Business 55(3): 1, 12.Google Scholar
  29. Wellman, D. (2000b). “Mother nature: One hot mama.” Supermarket Business 55(3): 39, 42-48.Google Scholar
  30. Wilkins J. L., E. Bowdish, and J. Sobal (2000). “University student perceptions of seasonal and local foods.” Journal of Nutrition Education 32: 261–268.Google Scholar
  31. Winson, A. (1993). The Intimate Commodity: Food and the Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex in Canada. Toronto: Garamond Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rural SociologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Nutritional SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations