Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 535–544 | Cite as

The muscle-specific enolase is an early marker of human myogenesis

  • Françoise Fougerousse
  • Frédérique Edom-Vovard
  • Tatyana Merkulova
  • Marie-Odile Ott
  • Muriel Durand
  • Gillian Butler-Browne
  • Angélica Keller


In higher vertebrates, the glycolytic enzyme enolase (2-phospho-D-glycerate hydrolase; EC is active as a dimer formed from three different subunits, α, β and γ, encoded by separate genes. The expression of these genes is developmentally regulated in a tissue-specific manner. A shift occurs during development, from the unique embryonic isoform αα, towards specific isoforms in two tissues with high energy demands: αβ and γγ in the nervous system, αβ and ββ in striated muscles. The αα remains widely distributed in adult tissues. Here we report the results of the first extensive study of β enolase expression during human development. Indeed, the β subunit is specifically expressed at early stages of human myogenesis. Immunocytochemical analyses demonstrated that it is first detected in the heart of 3-week-old embryos and in the myotomal compartment of somites from 4-week-old embryos. At this stage, the muscle-specific sarcomeric protein titin is expressed in this structure, which will give rise to all body skeletal muscles, but embryonic myosin heavy chain is not yet present. Analyses at the protein level show that, during human ontogenesis, myogenesis is accompanied by an increase in β enolase expression and by a decrease in the expression of the two other α and γ subunits. Furthermore, β enolase subunit is expressed in proliferating myoblasts from both embryonic and post-natal muscles. In addition, clonal analysis of primary cell cultures, obtained from the leg muscle of a 7-week-old human embryo, revealed that the β subunit is present in the dividing myoblasts of all four types, according to the classification of Edom-Vovard et al. [(1999) J Cell Sci 112: 191–199], but not in cells of the non-myogenic lineage. Myoblast fusion is accompanied by a large increase in β enolase expression. Our results demonstrate that this muscle-specific isoform of a glycolytic enzyme (β enolase) is among the earliest markers of myogenic differentiation in humans.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barbieri G, De Angelis L, Feo S, Cossu G and Giallongo A (1990) Differential expression of muscle-specific enolase in embryonic and fetal myogenic cells during mouse development. Differentiation 45: 179–184.Google Scholar
  2. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254.Google Scholar
  3. Bucher E, Dhoot G, Emerson M, Ober M and Emerson C Jr. (1999) Structure and evolution of the alternatively spliced fast troponin T isoform gene. J Biol Chem 274: 17,661–17,670.Google Scholar
  4. Comi G, Fortunato F, Lucchiari S, Bordoni A, Prelle A, Jann S, Keller A, Ciscato P, Galbiati S, Chiveri L, Torrente Y, Scarlato G and Bresolin N (2001) β-enolase deficiency, a new metabolic myopathy of distal glycolysis. Ann Neurol 50: 202–207.Google Scholar
  5. Edom F, Mouly V, Barbet J, Fiszman M and Butler-Browne G (1994) Clones of Human satellite cells can express in vitro both fast and slow myosin heavy chains. DevBiol 164: 219–229.Google Scholar
  6. Edom-Vovard F, Mouly V, Barbet J and Butler-Browne G (1999) The four populations of myoblasts involved in human limb muscle formation are present from the onset of primary myotube formation. J Cell Sci 112: 191–199.Google Scholar
  7. Firulli A and Olson E (1997) Modular regulation of muscle gene transcription: a mechanism for muscle cell diversity. Trends Genet 13: 364–369.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault G, Vacher M, Merkulova T, Keller A and Arrio-Dupont M (1999) Presence of enolase in the M-band of skeletal muscle and possible indirect interaction with MM-creatine kinase. Biochem J 338: 115–121.Google Scholar
  9. Fougerousse F, Durand M, Suel L, Pourquie O, Delezoide AL, Romero NB, Abitbol M and Beckmann JS (1998) Expression of genes (CAPN3, SGCA, SGCB, and TTN) involved in progressive muscular dystrophies during early human development. Genomics 48: 145–156.Google Scholar
  10. Haimoto H, Takahashi Y, Koshikawa T, Nagura H and Kato K (1985) Immunohistochemical localization of gamma-enolase in normal human tissues other than nervous and neuroendocrine tissues. Lab Invest 52: 257–263.Google Scholar
  11. Ibi T, Sabashi K, Kato K, Takahashi A and Sobue I (1983) Immuno histochemical demonstration of β-enolase in human skeletal muscle. Muscle and Nerve 6: 661–663.Google Scholar
  12. Kato K, Shimizu A, Semba R and Satoh T (1985) Tissue distribution, developmental profiles and effect of denervation of enolase isozymes in rat muscles. Biochim Biophys Acta 841: 50–58.Google Scholar
  13. Keller A, Demeurie J, Merkulova T, Géraud G, Cywiner Golenzer C, Lucas M and Chatelet FP (2000) Fibre-type distribution and subcellular localisation of α and β-enolase in mouse striated muscle. Biology of the Cell Oct 92: 527–535.Google Scholar
  14. Keller A, Ott MO, Lamandé N, Lucas M, Gros F, Buckingham M and Lazar M (1992) Activation of the gene encoding the glycolytic enzyme β-enolase during early myogenesis precedes an increased expression during fetal muscle development. Mech Dev 38: 41–54.Google Scholar
  15. Keller A, Rouzeau JD, Farhadian F, Wisnewsky C, Marotte F, Lamandé N, Samuel J, Schwartz K, Lazar M and Lucas M (1995) Differential expression of α-and β-enolase genes during rat heart development and hypertrophy. Amer J Physiol-Heart Circ Phy 38: H1843–H1851.Google Scholar
  16. Keller A, Scarna H, Mermet T and Pujol J (1981) Biochemical and immunological properties of the mouse brain enolases purified by a simple method. J Neurochem 36: 1389–1397.Google Scholar
  17. Lamandé N, Mazo A, Lucas M, Montarras D, Pinset C, Gros F, Legault-Demare L and Lazar M (1989) Murine muscle-specific enolase: cDNA cloning, sequence, and developmental expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 4445–4449.Google Scholar
  18. Lucas M, Goblet C, Keller A, Lamandé N, Gros F, Whalen R and Lazar M (1992) Modulation of embryonic and muscle-specific enolase gene products in the developing mouse hindlimb. Differentiation 51: 1–7.Google Scholar
  19. Masters C (1992) Microenvironmental factors and the binding of glycolytic enzymes to contractile filaments. Int J Biochem 24: 405–410.Google Scholar
  20. Merkulova T, Keller A, Oliviero P, Marotte F, Samuel JL, Rappaport L, Lamandé N and Lucas M (2000) Thyroid hormones differentially modulate enolase isozymes during rat skeletal and cardiac muscle development. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278: E330–339.Google Scholar
  21. Merkulova T, Lucas M, Jabet C, Lamandé N, Rouzeau J, Gros F, Lazar M and Keller A (1997) Biochemical characterization of the mouse muscle-specific enolase: developmental changes in electrophoretic variants and selective binding to other proteins. Biochem J 323: 791–800.Google Scholar
  22. Merkulova T, Thornell LE, Butler-Browne G, Oberlin C, Lucas M, Lamandé N, Lazar M and Keller A (1999) The beta enolase subunit displays three different patterns of microheterogeneity in human striated muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 20: 55–63.Google Scholar
  23. Oguni M, Tanaka O, Setogawa T, Shinohara H, Kato K and Semba R (1991) Immunohistochemical study on the development of extraocular muscle II. Human embryos. Acta Histochem Cytochem 24: 47–53.Google Scholar
  24. Peterson C, Cho M, Rastinejad F and Blau H (1992) β-Enolase is a marker of human myoblast heterogeneity prior to differentiation. DevBiol 151: 626–629.Google Scholar
  25. Semba R, Asano T and Kato K (1990) Physiological expression of neural marker proteins in the heart of young rats. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 54: 217–220.Google Scholar
  26. Sensenbrenner M, Lucas M and Deloulme J (1997) Expression of two neuronal markers, growth-associated protein 43 and neuronspecific enolase, in rat glial cells. J Mol Med 75: 653–663.Google Scholar
  27. Shinohara H, Tanaka O, Oguni M, Kato K and Semba R (1991) Mode of expression of muscle-type enolase isozyme in the developing limb bud of human embryos. Acta Anat Basel 140: 37–40.Google Scholar
  28. Srere P and Knull H (1998) Location-location-location. Trends Biochem Sci 23: 319–320.Google Scholar
  29. Weiss A and Leinwand L (1996) The mammalian myosin heavy chain gene family. Annu RevCell DevBiol 12: 417–439.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Françoise Fougerousse
    • 1
  • Frédérique Edom-Vovard
    • 2
  • Tatyana Merkulova
    • 3
  • Marie-Odile Ott
    • 4
  • Muriel Durand
    • 1
  • Gillian Butler-Browne
    • 5
  • Angélica Keller
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.GénéthonCNRS URA 1923EvryFrance
  2. 2.Institut d'EmbryologieCNRS et Collèe de FranceNogent sur MarneFrance
  3. 3.Institut des Vaisseaux et du SangHopital LariboisièreParisFrance
  4. 4.CHU Cochin Port-RoyalINSERM U 257ParisFrance
  5. 5.Faculté de Médecine Pitié-SalpétrièreCNRS URA 2115, Université Paris VIParisFrance
  6. 6.Laboratoire CRRET – CNRS UPRESA 7053Faculté des Sciences et Technologie Université Paris XIICréteil CedexFrance
  7. 7.Institut d'EmbryologieCNRS et Collèe de FranceNogent sur MarneFrance

Personalised recommendations