Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 373–388 | Cite as

Fish Communities of the Sacramento River Basin: Implications for Conservation of Native Fishes in the Central Valley, California

  • Jason T. May
  • Larry R. Brown


The associations of resident fish communities with environmental variables and stream condition were evaluated at representative sites within the Sacramento River Basin, California between 1996 and 1998 using multivariate ordination techniques and by calculating six fish community metrics. In addition, the results of the current study were compared with recent studies in the San Joaquin River drainage to provide a wider perspective of the condition of resident fish communities in the Central Valley of California as a whole. Within the Sacramento drainage, species distributions were correlated with elevational and substrate size gradients; however, the elevation of a sampling site was correlated with a suite of water-quality and habitat variables that are indicative of land use effects on physio-chemical stream parameters. Four fish community metrics – percentage of native fish, percentage of intolerant fish, number of tolerant species, and percentage of fish with external anomalies – were responsive to environmental quality. Comparisons between the current study and recent studies in the San Joaquin River drainage suggested that differences in water-management practices may have significant effects on native species fish community structure. Additionally, the results of the current study suggest that index of biotic integrity-type indices can be developed for the Sacramento River Basin and possibly the entire Central Valley, California. The protection of native fish communities in the Central Valley and other arid environments continues to be a conflict between human needs for water resources and the requirements of aquatic ecosystems; preservation of these ecosystems will require innovative management strategies.

native species introduced species water-quality environmental gradients flow regulation index of biotic integrity metrics multivariate analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Baltz, D.M. & P.B. Moyle. 1993. Invasion resistance to introduced fishes by a native assemblage of California stream fishes. Ecol. Appl. 3: 246–255.Google Scholar
  2. Baltz, D.M., P.B. Moyle & N.J. Knight 1982. Competitive interaction between benthic stream fishes, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, and speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 39: 1502–1511.Google Scholar
  3. Bottom, D.L. 1995. Restoring salmon ecosystems, myth and reality. Res. Manag. Notes: 64: 37–40.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, L.R. 2000. Fish communities and their associations with environmental variables, lower San Joaquin River drainage, California. Env. Biol. Fish. 57: 251–269.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L.R. & T.J. Ford. 2002. Effects of flowon the fish communities of a regulated California river: implications for managing native fishes. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Brown, L.R. & P.B. Moyle. 1993. Distribution, ecology, and status of fishes of the San Joaquin drainage, California. Calif. Fish and Game 79: 96–114.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L.R. & P.B. Moyle. 1997. Invading species in the Eel River, California: successes, failures, and relationships with resident species. Env. Biol. Fish. 49: 271–291.Google Scholar
  8. Cech, J.J, Jr., S.J. Mitchell, D.T. Castleberry & M. McEnroe. 1990. Distribution of California stream fishes: influence of environmental temperature and hypoxia. Env. Biol. Fish. 29: 95–105.Google Scholar
  9. Elvira, B. 1995. Native and exotic freshwater fishes in Spanish River basins. Freshwat. Biol. 33: 103–108.Google Scholar
  10. Fausch, K.D., J.R. Karr & P.R. Yant. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 113: 39–55.Google Scholar
  11. Gauch, H.G. Jr. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York. 298 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Godinho, F.N., M.T. Ferreira & R.V. Cortes. 1997. Composition and spatial organization of fish assemblage in the lower Guadiana basin, Southern Iberia. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish 6: 134–143.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca. 90 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, M.O.R & H.G. Gauch. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved eigenvector technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, R.M.R & J.R. Gammon. 1987. Longitudinal changes in fish assemblages and water quality in the Willamette River, Oregon. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 116: 196–209.Google Scholar
  16. Jongman, R.H.G., C.J.F. ter Braak & O.F.R. Tongeren. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 299 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Kahrl, W.L., W.A. Bowen, S. Brand, M.L. Shelton, D.L. Shelton & D.A. Ryan. 1978. The California water atlas: the governor's office of planning and research, Sacramento. 118 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.Google Scholar
  19. Marchetti, M.P. & P.B. Moyle. 2001. Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in regulated California stream. Ecol. Appl. 11: 75–87.Google Scholar
  20. Meffe, G.K. 1991. Failed invasion of a southeastern black water stream by bluegill: implications for conservation of native communities. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 120: 333–338.Google Scholar
  21. Minkely, W.L. & G.K. Meffe. 1987. Differential selection by flooding in stream fish communities of the arid American Southwest. pp. 93–104. In: W.J. Matthews & D.C. Heins (ed.) Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
  22. Mount, J.F. 1995. California rivers and streams: the conflict between fluvial process and land use. University of California Press, Berkeley. 359 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Moyle, P.B. 1976a. Fish introductions in California: history and impact of native fishes. Biol. Conserv. 9: 101–118.Google Scholar
  24. Moyle, P.B. 1976b. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley. 405 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Moyle, P.B. 1995. Conservation of native freshwater fishes in the mediterranean-type climate of California, USA: a review. Biol. Conserv. 72: 721–279.Google Scholar
  26. Moyle, P.B. & T. Light. 1996a. Biological invasions of freshwater: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol. Conserv. 78: 149–162.Google Scholar
  27. Moyle, P.B. & T. Light. 1996b. Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77: 1666–1670.Google Scholar
  28. Moyle, P.B. & R.D. Nichols. 1973. Ecology of some native and introduced fishes of the Sierra Nevada foothills in central California. Copeia 1973: 978–990.Google Scholar
  29. Moyle, P.B. & R.D. Nichols. 1974. Decline of native fish fauna of the Sierra Nevada foothills, central California. Amer. Midl. Nat. 92: 72–83.Google Scholar
  30. Moyle, P.B. & P.J. Randall. 1998. Evaluating the biotic integrity in the Sierra Nevada, California. Conserv. Biol. 12: 1318–1326.Google Scholar
  31. Moyle, P.B., J.J. Smith, R.A. Daniels, T.L. Taylor, D.G. Price & D.M. Baltz. 1982. Distribution and ecology of stream fishes of the Sacramento- San Joaquin drainage system, California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 115: 1–256.Google Scholar
  32. Nehlsen, W., J.A. Lichatowich & J.E. Williams. 1992. Pacific salmon and the search for sustainability. Renew. Resourc. 10: 20–26.Google Scholar
  33. Omernik, J.M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geog. 77: 118–125.Google Scholar
  34. Rahel, F.J. 1990. The hierachical nature of community persistance: a problem of scale. Amer. Nat. 136: 328–344.Google Scholar
  35. Reisner, M. 1986. Cadillac desert. Viking-Peguin, New York. 582 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Schulz, P.D. & D.D. Simons. 1973. Fish species diversity in a prehistoric central California indian midden. Calf. Fish and Game 59: 107–113.Google Scholar
  37. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector method for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.Google Scholar
  38. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. CANOCO: a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis. TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen. 95 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Yoshiyama, R.M., F.W. Fisher & P.B. Moyle. 1998. Historical abundance and decline of Chinook salmon in the central valley region of California. N. Amer. Fish. Manag. 18: 487–521.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason T. May
    • 1
  • Larry R. Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Geological Survey, WRDCalifornia State University Sacramento FoundationSacramentoU.S.A.
  2. 2.U.S. Geological Survey, WRDSacramentoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations