Advertisement

Computational Economics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 95–132 | Cite as

Heterogeneous Beliefs, Risk and Learning in a Simple Asset Pricing Model

  • Carl Chiarella
  • Xue-Zhong He
Article

Abstract

Trade among individuals occurs either because tastes (risk aversion)differ, endowments differ, or beliefs differ. Utilising the concept of`adaptively rational equilibrium' and a recent framework of Brock and Hommes[6, 7] this paper incorporates risk and learning schemes into a simplediscounted present value asset price model with heterogeneous beliefs. Agentshave different risk aversion coefficients and adapt their beliefs (aboutfuture returns) over time by choosing from different predictors orexpectations functions, based upon their past performance as measured byrealized profits. By using both bifurcation theory and numerical analysis, itis found that the dynamics of asset pricing is affected by the relative riskattitudes of different types of investors. It is also found that the externalnoise and learning schemes can significantly affect the dynamics. Comparedwith the findings of Brock and Hommes [7] on the dynamics caused by change ofthe intensity of choice to switch predictors, it is found that many of theirinsights are robust to the generalizations considered: however, the resultingdynamical behavior is considerably enriched and exhibits some significantdifferences.

asset pricing risk heterogeneous beliefs bifurcation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, S., de Palma, A. and Thisse, J. (1993). Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold, L. (1998), Random Dynamical Systems. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beja, A. and Goldman, M.B. (1980). On the dynamic behavior of prices in disequilibrium. Journal of Finance, 35, 235–247.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black, F. (1986). Noise. Journal of Finance, 41, 529–543.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brock, W. and Hommes, C. (1977). Models of complexity in economics and finance. In C. Heij, J.M. Schumacher, B. Hanzon, C. Praagman (eds), Systems Dynamics in Economic and Finance Models. Wiley, NY, Ch. 1, pp. 3–44.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brock, W. and Hommes, C. (1997). A rational route to randomness. Econometrica, 65, 1059–1095.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brock, W. and Hommes, C. (1998). Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22, 1235–1274.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell, J. and Kyle, A. (1993). Smart money, noise trading and stock price behaviour. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 1–34.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shu-Heng Chen and Chia-Hsuan Yeh (1997). Toward a computable approach to the efficient market hypothesis: An application of genetic programming. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21, 1043–1063.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shu-Heng Chen and Chia-Hsuan (1999). Genetic programming in agent-based artificial markets: Simulations and analysis. Technical Report. National Chengchi University.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiarella, C. (1992). The dynamics of speculative behaviour. Annals of Operations Research, 37, 101–123.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiarella, C. and He, X.-Z. (2001). The interactions of wealth dynamics, learning and heterogeneity in a simple asset pricing model. Working Paper No. 56. School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology, Sydney.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Day, R. and Huang, W. (1990). Bulls, bears and market sheep. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14, 299–329.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeLong, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L.H. and Waldmann, R.J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 703–738.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elaydi S. (1996). An Introduction to Difference Equations. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1988). Permanent and transitory components of stock prices. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 246–273.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Franke, R. and Nesemann, T. (1999). Two destabilizing strategies may be jointly stabilizing. Journal of Economics, 69, 1–18.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Franke, R. and Sethi, R. (1998). Cautious trend-seeking and complex asset price dynamics. Research in Economics, 52, 61–79.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iori, G. (1999). A microsimulation of traders activity in the stock market: The role of heterogeneity, agents' interactions and trade frictions. Int. J. of Modern Physics C, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gaunersdorfer, A. (1999). Endogenous fluctuations in a simple asset pricing model with heterogeneous agents. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grossman, S. (1989). The Informational Role of Prices. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lux, T. (1995). Herd behaviour, bubbles and crashes. Economic Journal, 105, 881–896.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lux, T. (1997). Time variation of second moments from a noise trader/infection model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22, 1–38.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lux, T. (1998). The socio-economic dynamics of speculative markets: Interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of return distributions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33, 143–165.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lux, T. and Marchesi, M. (1999). Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market. Nature, 397(11), 498–500.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manski, C. and McFadden, D. (1981). Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. MITT Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miller, E.M. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. Journal of Finance, 32, 1151–1168.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poterba, J.M. and Summers, L.H. (1988). Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 22, 27–60.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sethi, R. (1996). Endogenous regime switching in speculative markets. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 7, 99–118.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Summers, L.H. (1986). Does the stock market rationally reflect fundamental values. Journal of Finance, 41, 591–601.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl Chiarella
    • 1
  • Xue-Zhong He
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Finance and EconomicsUniversity of Technology, SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations