Research in Higher Education

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 357–378 | Cite as

Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension to Modified Honor Code Settings

  • Donald L. McCabe
  • Linda Klebe Treviño
  • Kenneth D. Butterfield

Abstract

Research has shown that traditional academic honor codes are generally associated with lower levels of student academic dishonesty. Utilizing data obtained from students at 21 colleges and universities, this study investigated the influence of modified honor codes, an alternative to traditional honor codes, that is gaining popularity on larger campuses. It also tested the model of student academic dishonesty previously suggested by McCabe and Treviño in a more diverse sample of campuses. Results suggest that modified honor codes are associated with lower levels of student dishonesty and that the McCabe and Treviño model appears to be reasonably robust.

academic integrity cheating honor codes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  3. Canning, R. (1956). Does an honor system reduce classroom cheating? An experimental answer. Journal of Experimental Education 24(4): 291-296.Google Scholar
  4. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on Tests: How to Do It, Detect It, and Prevent It. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Dalton, J. C. (1985). Promoting Values Development in College Students. Columbus, OH: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., and McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology 19(1): 16-20.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Ignelzi, M. G. (1990). Ethical education in a college environment: The just community approach. NASPA Journal 27(3): 192-198.Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing and Using Tests Effectively: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Jendrek, M. P. (1989). Faculty reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development 30(5): 401-406.Google Scholar
  13. Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  14. Kibler, W. L., and Patterson, B. G. (1988). Strategies to prevent academic dishonesty. In W. L. Kibler, E. M. Nuss, B. G. Patterson, and G. Pavela (eds.), Academic Integrity and Student Development: Legal Issues and Policy Perspectives, pp. 19-36. Asheville, NC: College Administration Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. ” In D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, pp. 347-480. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  16. Kohlberg, L. (1985). The just community approach to moral education in theory and practice. In M. W. Berkowitz and F. Oser (eds.), Moral Education: Theory and Practice, pp. 27-88. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. McCabe, D. L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry 62(3): 365-374.Google Scholar
  18. McCabe, D. L. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: The influence of student honor codes. Research in Higher Education 34(4): 647-658.Google Scholar
  19. McCabe, D. L., and Pavela, G. (1997). The principled pursuit of academic integrity. AAHE Bulletin 50(4): 11-12.Google Scholar
  20. McCabe, D. L., and Pavela, G. (2000). Some good news about academic integrity. Change 33 (5): 32-38.Google Scholar
  21. McCabe, D. L., and Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education 64(5): 522-538.Google Scholar
  22. McCabe, D. L., and Treviño, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education 38(3): 379-396.Google Scholar
  23. McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., and Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. The Journal of Higher Education 70(2): 211-234.Google Scholar
  24. Melendez, B. (1985). Honor Code Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  25. Michaels, J. W., and Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly 70(4): 872-885.Google Scholar
  26. Moss, B. (1984). Notes on Cheating for the Busy Classroom Teacher. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 243 203)Google Scholar
  27. Nuss, E. M. (1984). Academic integrity: Comparing faculty and student attitudes. Improving College and University Teaching 32(3): 140-143.Google Scholar
  28. Power, F. C., Higgins, A., and Kohlberg, L. (1989). Lawrence Kohlberg's Approach to Moral Education. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Randall, D. M., and Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics 10(11): 805-817.Google Scholar
  30. Rest, J. (1993) Research on moral judgment in college students. In A. Garrod (ed.), Approaches to Moral Development: New Research and Emerging Themes, pp. 201-213. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenhan, D. L., Moore, B. S., and Underwood, B. (1976). The social psychology of moral behavior. In T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior, pp. 241-252. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  32. Sax, L. J., Astin, A. W., Korn, W. S., and Mahoney, K. (1999). The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1999. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
  33. Schwartz, S. (1968). Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10(3): 232-242.Google Scholar
  34. Tittle, C. R., and Rowe, A. R. (1973). Moral appeal, sanction threat, and deviance: An experimental test. Social Problems 20(5): 488-497.Google Scholar
  35. Treviño, L. K., and McCabe, D. L. (1994). Meta-learning about business ethics: Building honorable business school communities. Journal of Business Ethics 13(6): 405-416.Google Scholar
  36. Treviño, L. K., and McCabe, D. L. (1998). Who's Who Among American High School Students. Lake Forest, IL; Educational Communications, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald L. McCabe
    • 1
  • Linda Klebe Treviño
    • 2
  • Kenneth D. Butterfield
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of ManagementRutgers University–NewarkNewark
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.USA

Personalised recommendations