Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 45, Issue 7–8, pp 455–480 | Cite as

Should We Take “Gender” Out of Gender Subtypes? The Effects of Gender, Evaluative Valence, and Context on the Organization of Person Subtypes

  • Sandra Carpenter
  • Susan Trentham
Article

Abstract

Previous research examining the organization of person subtypes has focused on gender and evaluation as organizing principles. Our research additionally examined subtype organization in terms of the classic “person categories” described in the self-concept and impression formation literature. Using both qualitative and quantitative measures, we examined the relative impact of these three mechanisms of subtype organization. We also investigated whether contextual cues impact subtype organization. We found that subtypes are more frequently organized in terms of person categories than by gender or evaluation. Also, as predicted, some subtype clusters' organization was relatively stable, whereas other subtype clusters were more sensitive to contextual influences. These results are discussed in terms of how characteristics that are salient in a situation may prime certain subtypes.

subtypes gender stereotypes gender evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashmore, R.D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. InR.D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts (pp. 69-119). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R. D., & Tumia, M. L. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory I: A personality description approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 501-518.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.Google Scholar
  4. Basow, S. A. (1980). Sex role stereotypes: Traditions and alternatives. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, M.B., Dull, V., & Lui, L. L. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 656-670.Google Scholar
  6. Brewer, M.B., & Lui, L. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition, 7, 262-274.Google Scholar
  7. Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. (1996). Use of sorting tasks to assess cognitive structures. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 375-385). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-153.Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter, S. (1993). Organization of in-group and out-group information: The influence of gender-role orientation. Social Cognition, 11, 70-91.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1998). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 679-696.Google Scholar
  12. Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D., & Wick, B. (1976). Stereotypes of women: A single category? Sex Roles, 2, 135-148.Google Scholar
  13. Coats, S., & Smith, E. R. (1999). Perceptions of gender subtypes: Sensitivity to recent exemplar activation and in-group/out-group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 515-526.Google Scholar
  14. Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1985). Some thoughts on the cognitive organization of gender-related information. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7, 123-144.Google Scholar
  15. Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 107-139). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  16. Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145-167.Google Scholar
  17. Del Boca, F. K., & Ashmore, R. D. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory II: A trait-inference approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 519-535.Google Scholar
  18. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.Google Scholar
  19. Devine, P. G., & Baker, S. M. (1991). Measurement of racial stereotype subtyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 44-50.Google Scholar
  20. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.Google Scholar
  21. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. InW. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-35). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Eckes, T. (1994a). Explorations in gender cognition: Content and structure of female and male subtypes. Social Cognition, 12, 37-60.Google Scholar
  23. Eckes, T. (1994b). Features of men, features of woman: Assessing stereotypic beliefs about gender subtypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 107-123.Google Scholar
  24. Eckes, T. (1996). Linking female and male subtypes to situations:Arange-of-situation-fit effect. Sex Roles, 35, 401-426.Google Scholar
  25. Edwards, G. H. (1992). The structure and content of the male gender role stereotype: An exploration of subtypes. Sex Roles, 27, 533-551.Google Scholar
  26. England, E. M. (1988). College student stereotypes of female behavior: Maternal professional women and assertive housewives. Sex Roles, 19, 365-385.Google Scholar
  27. England, E. M. (1992). College student gender stereotypes: Expectations about the behavior of male subcategory members. Sex Roles, 27, 699-716.Google Scholar
  28. Fiske, St. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gordon, C. (1968). Self-conceptions: Configurations of context. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction (pp. 115-136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, L. A., Lewandowski, D. A., Ingram, J. M., & Hodge, C. N. (1997). Group stereotypes: Content, gender specificity and affect associated with typical group members. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 381-396.Google Scholar
  34. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Larwood, L., Falbe, C. M., Kriger, M. P., & Meising, P. (1995). Structure and meaning of organizational vision. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 740-769.Google Scholar
  36. McArthur, L. A. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Heremann, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 201-246). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Moskowitz, D.S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761.Google Scholar
  38. Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS Professional Statistics 6.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Noseworthy, C. M., & Lott, A. J. (1984). The cognitive organization of gender-stereotypic categories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 474-481.Google Scholar
  40. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (1999). Social categorization and social context: Is stereotype change a matter of information or of meaning? In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 55-79). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Osgood, C. E., & Suci, G. J. (1955). Factor analysis of meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 325-338.Google Scholar
  42. Ostrom, T. (1975). Cognitive representations of impressions. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association convention.Google Scholar
  43. Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes on in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.Google Scholar
  44. Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45-48.Google Scholar
  45. Sheriffs, A. C., & McKee, J. P. (1957). Qualitative aspects of belief about men and women. Journal of Personality, 25, 451-464.Google Scholar
  46. Sherman, J. W. (1996). Development of mental representations of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1126-1141.Google Scholar
  47. Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57-71.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M.A. (1992). Exemplar-based models of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.Google Scholar
  49. Srull, T. K. (1983). Organizational and retrieval processes in person memory:Anexamination of processing objectives, presentation format, and the possible role of self-generated retrieval cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1157-1170.Google Scholar
  50. Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glass, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207-218.Google Scholar
  51. St. Pierre, R., Herendeen, N. M., Moore, D. S., & Nagle, A. M. (1994). Does occupational stereotyping still exist? Journal of Psychology, 128, 589-598.Google Scholar
  52. Swim, J. (1993). In search of gender bias in evaluations and trait inferences: The role of diagnosticity and gender stereotypicality of behavioral information. Sex Roles, 29, 213-240.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, S. E. (1981).Acategorization approach to stereotyping. InD. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 83-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Trafimow, D., & Radhakrishnan, P. (1995). The cognitive organization of sex and occupation stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 189-197.Google Scholar
  55. Vescio, T. K., Hewstone, M., Crisp, R. J., & Rubin, J. M. (1999). Perceiving and responding to multiply categorizable individuals: Cognitive processes and affective integroup biases. In D. Abrams & M.A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 111-140). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition and its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322-359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Alabama in HuntsvilleUSA;
  2. 2.The University of Nevada in RenoUSA

Personalised recommendations