, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 325–335 | Cite as

Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case

  • Jacqueline Leta
  • Hernan Chaimovich


The number of Brazilian publications in the Institute for Scientific Information database, ISI, increased significantly in the last 20 years, comprising more than 1 percent of the database in the last two years. The relationship between size and recognition of Brazilian science, estimated by number of ISI-indexed publications, p, and citations, c, obeyed a power law, c = k pn. The value of n, a known indicator of such relationship was 1.42 ± 0.04, significantly higher than that found for the whole set of ISI-indexed world publications. The recent growth of Brazilian publication was not solely due to international collaboration, since over the last six years international collaboration, estimated as the percentage of Brazilian publications having at least one foreign address, reached a constant value of ca. 30%. International collaboration increased the impact of Brazilian publications. Although the most frequent collaborating countries are those that produce the largest percentage of world"s science, Brazilian collaboration with Argentina and Chile exhibit impacts comparable to the major science producers.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. S. Katz, Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation, Science and Public Policy 27 (2000) 1-23.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. S. Katz, The self-similar science system, Research Policy 28 (1999) 501-517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. S. Katz, D. Hicks, How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Proceedings on the 6 th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, Israel, June 16-19 (1999) pp. 163-175.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Narin, K. Stevens, E. S. Whitlow, Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers, Scientometrics 21 (1991) 313-323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. GlÄnzel, A. Schubert, Double effect = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry, Scientometrics 50 (2001) 199-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. F. J. Van Raan, The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results, Scientometrics 42 (1998) 423-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. de B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I — the professional origins of scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics 1 (1978) 65-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Leclerc, J. Gagne, International scientific cooperation — the continentalization of science, Scientometrics 31 (1997) 253-263.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. S. Katz, B. R. Martin, What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1997) 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. S. Katz, Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration, Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 31-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. GlÄnzel, National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations, Scientometrics, 51 (2001) 69-115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Leta, L. de Meis, A profile of science in Brazil, Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 33-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Macilwain, Collapse of real sharpens Brazil's contrasts, Nature (supplement), 398 (1999) A16-A18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISI, Institute for Scientific Information — Web of Science, available for Brazilian Institutions at Total world publications summed up 780,355 in 1981 and 1,166,116 in 1998 (49.4% of increase); total of Brazilian publications in the same period increased from 2,607 to 10,420 (299.7% of increase).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Braun, W. GlÄnzel, H. Maczelka, A. Schubert, World science in the eighties. National performance in publication output and citation impact, 1985-1989 versus 1980-1984, Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 3-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    NSF, National Science Foundation. Science and Engineering — Indicators 2000. Available at Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. GlÄnzel, A. Schubert, H. J. Czerwon, A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995), Scientometrics 45 (1999) 185-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. de Meis, J. Leta, O perfil da ciência brasileira, Editora UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Meneghini, The key role of collaborative work in the growth of Brazilian science in the last ten years, Scientometrics 35 (1996) 367-373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Leta, D. Lannes, L. de Meis, Human resources and scientific productivity in Brazil, Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 313-324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Velho, Redes regionais de cooperação em C&T e o Mercosul, Parcerias estratégicas 10 (2001) 58-74.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Arunahalam, R. Srinivasan, V. Raman, International collaboration in science: participation by the Asian giants, Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 7-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Fonseca, The impact of Brazilian publications in Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Ciência e Cultura 44 (1992) 172-177.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. Gibbs, The lost science in the third world, Scientific American 273 (1995) 76-83.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Vessuri, Recent strategies for adding value to scientific journals in Latin America, Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 139-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. NarvÁez-Berthelemot, J. M. Russel, L. Velho, Scientific collaboration of the Mercosur countries as an indicator of Latin American regional activity, Research Evaluation 8 (1999) 83-90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacqueline Leta
    • 1
  • Hernan Chaimovich
    • 2
  1. 1.Pró-Reitoria de PesquisaUniversidade de Săo PauloSala 28, Săo PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Pró-Reitoria de PesquisaUniversidade de Săo PauloSăo Paulo(Brazil)

Personalised recommendations