Sex Roles

, Volume 45, Issue 7–8, pp 567–577 | Cite as

Respected or Rejected: Perceptions of Women Who Confront Sexist Remarks

  • Elizabeth H. Dodd
  • Traci A. Giuliano
  • Jori M. Boutell
  • Brooke E. Moran
Article

Abstract

This study explored perceptions of women as a function of their reactions to a sexist remark. One hundred and twenty college students (60 women and 60 men) were asked to read a transcript of a conversation among 3 friends (2 men and 1 woman). As part of a 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects design, male and female participants read a scenario in which one of the men made either a sexist remark or an ambiguous remark, which the woman then either ignored or confronted. The results showed that female participants both liked and respected the target woman more when she confronted the sexist remark than when she did not confront it. However, although male participants' respect for the target was not affected by her response to the sexist remark, they liked the target woman less when she confronted the sexist remark than when she did not confront it. Previous research (J. K. Swim & L. L. Hyers, 1998) suggests that although women often want to confront sexist remarks, in practice they may remain silent because of self-presentational concerns. Our results confirmed that women's fears of negative repercussions are somewhat justified, at least as far as men are concerned.

gender differences perceptions sexism language 

REFERENCES

  1. Baccus, J. R., & Baldwin, M.W. (2001, June). Being respected or being liked: Primed relational motives and self-esteem. Paper presented at the 13th annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Toronto.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, L., & Perot, A. R. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 31-47.Google Scholar
  3. Bulman, R. J., & Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 351-363.Google Scholar
  4. Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Pascale, L. (1975).When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520-530.Google Scholar
  5. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.Google Scholar
  6. Dion, K. L. (1975).Women's reactions to discrimination from members of the same or opposite sex. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 294-306.Google Scholar
  7. Fiala, S. E., Giuliano, T. A., Remlinger, N. M., & Braithwaite, L. C. (1999). Lending a helping hand: The effects of gender stereotypes and gender on likelihood of helping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2164-2176.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., et al. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.Google Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995).Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117-138.Google Scholar
  10. Jack, D. C. (1991). Silencing the self:Women and depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Knight, J. L., & Giuliano, T. A. (2001). Sporting stereotypes: The influence of gender schemas on perceptions of athletes. Paper presented at the 13th annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179-196.Google Scholar
  13. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.Google Scholar
  14. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  15. Morrison, M. A., Morrison, T. G., Pope, G. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (1999). An investigation of measures of modern and old-fashioned sexism. Social Indicators Research, 48, 39-50.Google Scholar
  16. Rudich, E. A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1999). To belong or to self-enhance? Motivational bases for choosing interaction partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1387-1404.Google Scholar
  17. Swim, J. K., Cohen, L. L., & Hyers, L. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say? Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.Google Scholar
  19. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1997). Statistical district of the United States.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth H. Dodd
    • 1
  • Traci A. Giuliano
    • 1
  • Jori M. Boutell
    • 1
  • Brooke E. Moran
    • 1
  1. 1.Southwestern UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations