Scientometrics

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 95–111 | Cite as

European Union associated university websites

  • Mike Thelwall
  • Ray Binns
  • Gareth Harries
  • Teresa Page-Kennedy
  • Liz Price
  • David Wilkinson
Article

Abstract

The web site is an important communication medium for universities in many countries. There are numerous reasons to expect that their characteristics will vary along national lines, the most immediate being differences in technological level and the organisation of higher education. In a world where the web is seen in many places as an important source of information it has the potential to overcome national boundaries, but are there still technological barriers? This paper reports on the results of a survey of the sizes of 670 web sites of higher education institutions in countries associated with the European Union, as estimated by AltaVista. It finds that there are still enormous national differences of up to three orders of magnitude. A related issue addressed is the extent to which AltaVista"s coverage of university web sites is reliable and consistent across Europe. Large but uneven differences were identified between the main engine and national variations. Despite such methodological problems and cultural reasons for national variations in web site development, a clear pattern emerges, with the richer countries in Europe having much larger web sites. This is a problem for those wishing to use the Internet to increase international collaboration.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bar-Ilan, J. (1999). Search engine results over time-A case study on search engine stability. Cybermetrics, 2/3. [online]. Available: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v2i1p1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2001). Data collection methods on the Web for informetric purposes-A review and analysis. Scientometrics, 50(1): 7-32.Google Scholar
  3. Boezerooy, P., Vossensteyn, H. (1999). How to get in?-a comparative overview of access to higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 24(3): 349-358.Google Scholar
  4. Bologna Declaration (1999). Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education Convened in Bologna on the 19th of June 1999. [online]. Available: http://www.unige.ch/cre/activities/Bologna%20Forum/Bologne1999/bologna%20declaration.htm (March 2001)Google Scholar
  5. Cambridge University (2001). General Guidelines for consideration of proposals for collaboration with other universities in the provision of courses and examinations. [online]. Available: http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/education/collab.html (February 2001)Google Scholar
  6. Chon, K. (2001). The future of the Internet digital divide, Communications of the ACM, 44(3): 116-117.Google Scholar
  7. Cia (2000). World Factbook 2000. [online]. Available: http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html (May 2001)Google Scholar
  8. Darmoni, S. J., Thirion, B., Douyere, M., Challoub, C., Leroy, J. P. (2000). Measurment of the Web site impact: the Web Impact Factor. The example of the French University Hospitals. Revue du Praticien-Médecine Générale, 14 (516): 2079-2080.Google Scholar
  9. Euroeducation Net (2001). [online]. Available http://www.euroeducation.net/ (March 2001)Google Scholar
  10. Europa (2001). Fifth framework programme. [online]. Available: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp5.html (February 2001)Google Scholar
  11. European Union (1998). A guide to higher education systems and qualifications in the EU and EEA countries. [online]. Available: http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/socrates/erasmus/guide/default.html (March 2001)Google Scholar
  12. Gruntorad, J. (1992). Research and academic networking in the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 25(4–5): 438-443.Google Scholar
  13. Hefce, (2001). Institutions funded by the Council. [online]. Available: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/UniColl/default.htm (March 2001)Google Scholar
  14. House OF Commons (2000). Commons Committee stage of the Learning and Skills Bill debate. [online]. Available: http://www.brad.ac.uk/admin/conted/action/News%20and%20Events/learningbill.htmGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2): 236-243.Google Scholar
  16. Knudsen, I., Haug, G., Kirstein, J. (1999). Trends in learning structures in higher education. [online]. Available: http://www.rks.dk/trends1.htm (March 2001)Google Scholar
  17. Leydesdorff, L., Curran, M. (2000). Mapping university-industry-government relations on the Internet: the construction of indicators for a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics, 4. [online]. Available: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v4i1p2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  18. Middleton, I., Mcconnell, M., Davidson, G. (1999). Presenting a model for the structure and content of a university World Wide Web site. Journal of Information Science, 25(3): 219-227.Google Scholar
  19. Rousseau, R. (1999). Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight. Cybermetrics, 2/3. [online]. Available: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v2i1p2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  20. Snyder, H., Rosenbaum, H. (1998). How public is the Web?: Robots, Access and Scholarly Communication. Proceedings of the ASIS 98 Annual Meeting, 453-462.Google Scholar
  21. Snyder, H., Rosenbaum, H. (1999). Can search engines be used for web-link analysis? A critical review. Journal of Documentation, 55(4), 375-384.Google Scholar
  22. Sporn, B. (1999). Towards more adaptive universities: trends of institutional reform in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 24(1): 23-33.Google Scholar
  23. Sroka, M. (1998). Commercial development of the Internet and WWW in Eastern Europe. Online & CD-ROM Review, 22(6): 367-376.Google Scholar
  24. Stannet (2001), Les serveurs W3 sur StanNet. [online]. http://www.u-nancy.fr/ (April 2001)Google Scholar
  25. Thelwall, M. (2001a). Results from a Web Impact Factor crawler. Journal of Documentation, 57(2): 177-191.Google Scholar
  26. Thelwall, M. (2001b). Extracting macroscopic information from web links. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (13) 1157-1168.Google Scholar
  27. Thelwall, M. (2001c). The responsiveness of search engine indexes. Cybermetrics, 5(1). [online]. Available: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v5i1p1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  28. UK Research Office (2001). [online]. Available: http://www.ukro.ac.uk/Google Scholar
  29. Wright, P., Campbell C., Garrett, R. (1997a). Setting the context of higher education in Europe (The national committee of enquiry into Higher Education). [online]. Available: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/r11_065.htm (March 2001)Google Scholar
  30. Wright, P., Campbell C., Garrett, R. (1997b). The relationship of UK degrees to those elsewhere in Europe (The national committee of enquiry into Higher Education). [online]. Available: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/r11_069.htm (March 2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Thelwall
    • 1
  • Ray Binns
    • 2
  • Gareth Harries
    • 2
  • Teresa Page-Kennedy
    • 2
  • Liz Price
    • 1
  • David Wilkinson
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computing and Information TechnologyUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK
  2. 2.Wolverhampton School of Computing and Information TechnologyUniversity of WolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations