Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 159–164 | Cite as

Conscious Processing of Sexual Information: Interference Caused by Sexual Primes

  • Mark Spiering
  • Walter Everaerd
  • Bernet Elzinga


The concept Sexual Content-Induced Delay (SCID) refers to a hesitancy in decision making related to erotic material (Geer & Bellard, 1996; Geer & Melton, 1997). Empirical evidence about SCID stems from lexical decision tasks. Our previous studies also showed SCID effects in sex versus neutral categorization tasks in which pictures were used. In these tasks, recognition of sexual pictures is delayed when preceded by consciously presented sexual primes. In the current study, 2 manipulations were added to the categorization task to investigate underlying information processing mechanisms of SCID. Firstly, the appraisal process was influenced by varying the instructions. Secondly, primes with nonsexual emotional content were added to test the specificity of the SCID effect. Thirty-seven undergraduates were asked to categorize sexual and neutral pictures that were primed by sexual, threatening, and neutral primes. Participants ignored or focussed prime content dependent on 2 different instructions. Results showed that the SCID effect only emerged when sexual primes were ignored; however, threatening primes also decelerated recognition of sexual pictures after the ignore instruction. Results of the focus instruction were qualitatively different, that is, participants recognized sexual pictures faster when primed sexually. It was suggested that SCID can be interpreted as the activation of regulatory modules by emotional stimuli in the stage of elicitation of emotional response. In contrast, when the sexual system is already activated, it appears that decisions regarding sexual information are facilitated.

appraisal information processing interference priming sexuality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abel, G. G., Huffman, J., Warberg, B., & Holland, C. L. (1998). Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 81-95.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 140-148.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.Google Scholar
  4. Everaerd, W. (1995). Information processing approach and the sexual response in human studies. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), The pharmacology of sexual function and dysfunction: Proceedings of the Esteve Foundation Symposium VI (pp. 175-184). Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.Google Scholar
  5. Geer, J. H., & Bellard, H. S. (1996). Sexual content induced delays in unprimed lexical decisions: Gender and context effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 379-395.Google Scholar
  6. Geer, J. H., Lapour, K. J., & Jackson, S. R. (1993). The information processing approach to human sexuality. In N. Birbaumer & A. Öhman (Eds.), The structure of emotion: Psychophysiological, cognitive, and clinical aspects (pp. 139-155). Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe-Huber.Google Scholar
  7. Geer, J. H., & Manguno-Mire, G. M. (1996). Gender differences in cognitive processes in sexuality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 7, 90-124.Google Scholar
  8. Geer, J. H., & Melton, J. S. (1997). Sexual content-induced delay with double-entendre words. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 295-316.Google Scholar
  9. Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic cognitive processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Towards an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8-23.Google Scholar
  10. Lang, P. J., Öhman, A., & Vaitl, D. (1988). The International Affective Picture System [Photographic slides]. Gainesville: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  11. Lazarus, R. S., Kanner, A. D., & Folkman, S. (1980). Emotions: A cognitive-phenomenological analysis. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: Vol.1.Theories of emotion (pp. 189-217). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.Google Scholar
  13. Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Eysenck, M. (1992). Attentional bias to threat in clinical anxiety states. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 149-159.Google Scholar
  14. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.Google Scholar
  15. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.Google Scholar
  16. Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2000). Conscious processing of sexual information: Mechanisms of primary appraisal. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  17. Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3-24.Google Scholar
  18. Wright, L. W., & Adams, H. E. (1999). The effects of stimuli that vary in erotic content on cognitive processes. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 145-151.Google Scholar
  19. Zeelenberg, R., Pecher, D., de Kok, D., & Raaijmakers, J. G.W. (1998). Inhibition from nonword primes in lexical decision reexamined: The critical influence of instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1068-1079.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Spiering
    • 1
  • Walter Everaerd
    • 1
  • Bernet Elzinga
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PsychologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations