Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 109–119 | Cite as

The Use of E-Mail and In-Class Writing to Facilitate Student–Instructor Interaction in Large-Enrollment Traditional and Active Learning Classes

Article

Abstract

Student–instructor communication was examined in freshman biology classes taught either in traditional lecture style or by using a variety of student-centered, active learning approaches to engage students in the learning process (cooperative learning groups, wireless microphones, permanent name tags, in-class and out-of-class writing). In both classes students were encouraged to send questions, comments, and suggestions to the instructor via e-mail. In the active learning class, students also wrote in-class notes to the instructor. All messages could be classified as either content-related or procedural. More content-related messages were received in the active learning class than in the traditional class. Also, the percentage of students who sent content-related messages was much higher in the active learning class than in the traditional class. Finally, content-related messages from students in the active learning class were generally more thoughtful and insightful than those from students in the traditional class.

e-mail messages introductory biology course active learning student–instructor communication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Angelo, T. A., and Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty, 2nd ed, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  3. Collins,M. (1998). The use of e-mail and electronic bulletin boards in college-level biology. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 17: 75-94.Google Scholar
  4. Commeyras, M. (1995). What can we learn from students' questions? Theory into Practice 34: 101-106.Google Scholar
  5. Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Hobson H. K., and Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education 60: 181-199.Google Scholar
  6. Harwood, W. S. (1996). The one-minute paper: A communication tool for large lecture classes. Journal of Chemical Education 73: 229-230.Google Scholar
  7. Hedges, K., and Mania-Farnell, B. (1998). Using E-mail to improve communication in the introductory science classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching 28: 198-202.Google Scholar
  8. Laurillard,D. (1999). Using communications and information technology effectively. In McKeachie, W. J. (Ed.), Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, Houghton Mifflin, New York, Chap. 17, pp. 183-200.Google Scholar
  9. Marbach-Ad, G., and Sokolove P. G. (2001). Creating direct channels of communication, Journal of College Science Teaching 31: 178-182, 212.Google Scholar
  10. McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, Houghton Mifflin, New York.Google Scholar
  11. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. National Research Council (1997). Science Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. National Science Foundation (1996). Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, National Science Foundation, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  14. Slovacek, S. P., and Doyle-Nichols, A. R. (1991). Enhancing telecommunication in teacher education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 24: 254-264.Google Scholar
  15. Sokolove, P. G. (1998). The challenge of teaching Biology 100: Can I really promote active learning in a large lecture? In Gardner, M. B., and Ayres, D. L. (Eds.), Journeys of Transformation, Maryland Collaborative for Teacher Preparation, College Park, MD, pp. 121-128.Google Scholar
  16. Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal 23: 362-372.Google Scholar
  17. Zack, M. H. (1995). Using electronic messaging to improve the quality of instruction. Journal of Education for Business 70: 202-206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationTel-Aviv UniversityRamat-Aviv, Tel-AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Maryland Baltimore CountyBaltimore

Personalised recommendations