Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 405–421 | Cite as

The Evolving Structure of the Environmental Justice Movement in the United States: New Models for Democratic Decision-Making

  • Daniel Faber
  • Deborah McCarthy
Article

Abstract

Over the last two decades in the United States, mainstream environmental organizations have reduced, rather than increased, democratic participation by citizens in environmental problem-solving. The environmental justice movement, on the other hand, has served to enlarge the constituency of the environmental movement by incorporating poorer communities and oppressed people of color into environmental decision making process; build community capacity by developing campaigns and projects that address the common links between various social and environmental problems; and facilitate community empowerment by emphasizing grassroots organizing over advocacy. This paper outlines the different components in the environmental justice movement. It is our contention that if researchers and policymakers continue to conceive of the ecological crisis as a collection of unrelated problems, then it is possible that some combination of regulations, incentives, and technical innovations can keep pollution and resource destruction at “tolerable” levels for more affluent socioeconomic populations. However, poor working class communities and people of color which lack the political–economic resources to defend themselves will continue to suffer the worst abuses. However, if the interdependency of issues is emphasized as advocated by the environmental justice movement, then a transformative environmental politics can be invented.

ecological democracy environmental justice environmental policy social movements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alston, D. (1991). We Speak for Ourselves: Social Justice, Race, and Environment, Panos Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Bastian, A., and Alston, D. (1993). An open letter to funding colleagues: New developments in the environmental justice movement, The NewWorld Foundation and the PublicWelfare Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Borgos, S., and Douglas, S. (1986). Community organizing and civil renewal: A view from the south. Soc. Policy 1: 18–28.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant, B., and Mohai, P. (1992). Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse, Westview, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  5. Bullard, R. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality, Westview, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  6. Bullard, R. (1994). Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. Bullard, R. (2000). 2000 Directory: People of Color Environment Groups, Environmental Justice Resource Center, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  8. Dowie, M. (1995). Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenberg, P. (1997). A crisis in the nonprofit sector. Natl. Civ. Rev. 86: 331–341.Google Scholar
  10. Faber, D. (1993). Environment Under Fire: Imperialism and the Ecological Crisis in Central America. Monthly Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Faber, D. (1998). The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States, Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Faber, D., and Krieg, E. (2001). Unequal Exposure to Ecological Hazards: Environmental Injustices in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Northeastern University, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Gerzon, M. (1995). Reinventing philanthropy: Foundations and the renewal of civil society. Natl. Civ. Rev. 84: 188–195.Google Scholar
  14. Gottlieb, R. (1993). Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement, Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis, Beacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  16. Hofrichter, R. (2000). Reclaiming the Environmental Debate: The Politics of Health in a Toxic Culture, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Johnston, B. R. (1994). Who Pays the Price?: The Sociocultural Context of Environmental Crisis, Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, C. (1992). Proceedings: The National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit, United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Levenstein, C., and Wooding, J. (1998). Dying for a living:Workers, production, and the environment. In Faber, D. (ed.), The Struggle for Ecological Democracy, Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
  20. National Research Council (1991). Environmental Epidemiology: Public Health and Hazardous Wastes, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Madison, I., Miller, U., and Lee, C. (1992). The principle of environmental justice: Formation and meaning. In Lee, C. (ed.), Proceedings: The First National People of Color Leadership Summit, United Church of Christ, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Mohai, P. (ed.). Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards, Westview, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  23. Perfecto, I. (1992). Farm workers, pesticides and the international connection. In Bryant, B. (ed.), Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions, Island, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Pulido, L. (1996). Environmentalism and Economic Justice: Two Chicano Struggles in the Southwest, University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.Google Scholar
  25. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Rodman, J. (1980). Paradigm change in political science: An ecological perspective. Am. Behav. Scientist 24: 49–78.Google Scholar
  27. Schlosberg, D. (1999). Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  28. Shutkin, W. (2000). The Land That Could Be: Environmentalism and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Faber
    • 1
  • Deborah McCarthy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyNortheastern UniversityBoston
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyCollege of CharlestonCharleston

Personalised recommendations