Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 467–475 | Cite as

Tibialis anterior muscles in mdx mice are highly susceptible to contraction-induced injury

  • Christiana Dellorusso
  • Robert W. Crawford
  • Jeffrey S. Chamberlain
  • Susan V. Brooks
Article

Abstract

Skeletal muscles of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and mdx mice lack dystrophin and are more susceptible to contraction-induced injury than control muscles. Our purpose was to develop an assay based on the high susceptibility to injury of limb muscles in mdx mice for use in evaluating therapeutic interventions. The assay involved two stretches of maximally activated tibialis anterior (TA) muscles in situ. Stretches of 40% strain relative to muscle fiber length were initiated from the plateau of isometric contractions. The magnitude of damage was assessed one minute later by the deficit in isometric force. At all ages (2–19 months), force deficits were four- to seven-fold higher for muscles in mdx compared with control mice. For control muscles, force deficits were unrelated to age, whereas force deficits increased dramatically for muscles in mdx mice after 8 months of age. The increase in susceptibility to injury of muscles from older mdx mice did not parallel similar adverse effects on muscle mass or force production. The in situ stretch protocol of TA muscles provides a valuable assay for investigations of the mechanisms of injury in dystrophic muscle and to test therapeutic interventions for reversing DMD.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bodensteiner JB and Engel AG (1978) Intracellular calcium accumulation in Duchenne dystrophy and other myopathies: a study of 567,000 muscle fibers in 114 biopsies. Neurology 28: 439–446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks SV (1998) Rapid recovery following contraction-induced injury to in situ skeletal muscles in mdx mice. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 19: 179–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks SV, Zerba E and Faulkner JA (1995) Injury to muscle fibres after single stretches of passive and maximally stimulated muscles in mice. J Physiol (Lond) 488: 459–469.Google Scholar
  4. Brussee V, Tardif F and Tremblay JP (1997) Muscle fibers of mdx mice are more vulnerable to exercise than those of normal mice. Neuromuscul Disord 7: 487–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulfield G, Siller WG, Wight PA and Moore KJ (1984) X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 1189–1192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkholder TJ, Fingado B, Baron S and Lieber RL (1994) Relationship between muscle fiber types and sizes and muscle architectural properties in the mouse hindlimb. J Morphol 221: 177–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byun J, Heard JM, Huh JE, Park SJ, Jung EA, Jeong JO, Gwon HC and Kim DK (2001) Efficient expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in vitro and in vivo, using an adeno-associated virus vector. J Mol Cell Cardiol 33: 295–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox GA, Cole NM, Matsumura K, Phelps SF, Hauschka SD, Campbell KP, Faulkner JA and Chamberlain JS (1993) Overexpression of dystrophin in transgenic mdx mice eliminates dystrophic symptoms without toxicity. Nature 364: 725–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deconinck N, Rafael JA, Beckers-Bleukx G, Kahn D, Deconinck AE, Davies KE and Gillis JM (1998) Consequences of the combined deficiency in dystrophin and utrophin on the mechanical properties and myosin composition of some limb and respiratory muscles of the mouse. Neuromuscul Disord 8: 362–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubowitz V (1985) Muscle Biopsy: A practical approach. Bailliere Tindall Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  11. Ebihara S, Guibinga GH, Gilbert R, Nalbantoglu J, Massie B, Karpati G and Petrof BJ (2000) Differential effects of dystrophin and utrophin gene transfer in immunocompetent muscular dystrophy (mdx) mice. Physiol Genom 3: 133–144.Google Scholar
  12. Emery AEH (1993) Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Faulkner JA and Brooks SV (1994) An in situ single skeletal muscle model of contraction-induced injury: mechanistic interpretations. Basic Appl Myol 4: 17–23.Google Scholar
  14. Faulkner JA, Brooks SV, Dennis RG and Lynch GS (1997) The functional status of dystrophic muscles and functional recovery by skeletal muscles following myoblast transfer. Basic Appl Myol 7: 257–264.Google Scholar
  15. Ferrer A, Wells KE and Wells DJ (2000) Immune responses to dystropin: implications for gene therapy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Gene Ther 7: 1439–1446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbert R, Nalbantoglu J, Petrof BJ, Ebihara S, Guibinga GH, Tinsley JM, Kamen A, Massie B, Davies KE and Karpati G (1999) Adenovirus-mediated utrophin gene transfer mitigates the dystrophic phenotype of mdx mouse muscles. Hum Gene Ther 10: 1299–1310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gillis JM (1999) Understanding dystrophinopathies: an inventory of the structural and functional consequences of the absence of dystrophin in muscles of the mdx mouse. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 20: 605–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greelish JP, Su LT, Lankford EB, Burkman JM, Chen H, Konig SK, Mercier IM, Desjardins PR, Mitchell MA, Zheng XG, Leferovich J, Gao GP, Balice-Gordon RJ, Wilson JM and Stedman HH (1999) Stable restoration of the sarcoglycan complex in dystrophic muscle perfused with histamine and a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector. Nat Med 5: 439–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartigan-O'Connor D and Chamberlain JS (2000) Developments in gene therapy for muscular dystrophy. Microsc Res Tech 48: 223–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Head SI, Williams DA and Stephenson DG (1992) Abnormalities in structure and function of limb skeletal muscle fibres of dystrophic mdx mice. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 248: 163–169.Google Scholar
  21. Homan EP, Brown RH Jr and Kunkel LM (1987) Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell 51: 919–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch GS, Hinkle RT, Chamberlain JS, Brooks SV and Faulkner JA (2001) Force output of fast and slow skeletal muscles from young, adult and old mdx mice. J Physiol London 535: 591–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch GS, Rafael JA, Chamberlain JS and Faulkner JA (2000) Contraction-induced injury to single permeabilized muscle bers from mdx, transgenic mdx, and control mice. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279: C1290–C1294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marshall PA, Williams PE and Goldspink G (1989) Accumulation of collagen and altered fiber-type ratios as indicators of abnormal muscle gene expression in the mdx dystrophic mouse. Muscle Nerve 12: 528–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsuda R, Nishikawa A and Tanaka H (1995) Visualization of dystrophic muscle fibers in mdx mouse by vital staining with Evans blue: evidence of apoptosis in dystrophin-deficient muscle. J Biochem (Tokyo) 118: 959–964.Google Scholar
  26. Mendez J and Keys A (1960) Density and composition of mammalian muscle. Metabolism 9: 184–188.Google Scholar
  27. Moens P, Baatsen PH and Marechal G (1993) Increased susceptibility of EDL muscles from mdx mice to damage induced by contractions with stretch. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 14: 446–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petrof BJ, Shrager JB, Stedman HH, Kelly AM and Sweeney HL (1993) Dystrophin protects the sarcolemma from stresses developed during muscle contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 3710–3714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phelps SF, Hauser MA, Cole NM, Rafael JA, Hinkle RT, Faulkner JA and Chamberlain JS (1995) Expression of full-length and truncated dystrophin mini-genes in transgenic mdx mice. Hum Mol Genet 4: 1251–1258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacco P, Jones DA, Dick JR and Vrbova G (1992) Contractile properties and susceptibility to exercise-induced damage of normal and mdx mouse tibialis anterior muscle. Clin Sci (Colch) 82: 227–236.Google Scholar
  31. Sicinski P, Geng Y, Ryder-Cook AS, Barnard EA, Darlison MG and Barnard PJ (1989) The molecular basis of muscular dystrophy in the mdx mouse: a point mutation. Science 244: 1578–1580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith HK, Plyley MJ, Rodgers CD and McKee NH (1997) Skeletal muscle damage in the rat hindlimb following single or repeated daily bouts of downhill exercise. Int J Sports Med 18: 94–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stedman HH, Sweeney HL, Shrager JB, Maguire HC, Panettieri RA, Petrof B, Narusawa M, Leferovich JM, Sladky JT and Kelly AM (1991) The mdx mouse diaphragm reproduces the degenerative changes of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature 352: 536–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Straub V, Rafael JA, Chamberlain JS and Campbell KP (1997) Animal models for muscular dystrophy show different patterns of sarcolemmal disruption. J Cell Biol 139: 375–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valentine BA, Cooper BJ and Gallagher EA (1989) Intracellular calcium in canine muscle biopsies. J Compar Pathol 100: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Valentine BA, Cooper BJ, Cummings JF and de Lahunta A (1990) Canine X-linked muscular dystrophy: morphologic lesions. J Neurol Sci 97: 1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vilquin JT, Brussee V, Asselin I, Kinoshita I, Gingras M and Tremblay JP (1998) Evidence of mdx mouse skeletal muscle fragility in vivo by eccentric running exercise. Muscle Nerve 21: 567–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wakefield PM, Tinsley JM, Wood MJ, Gilbert R, Karpati G and Davies KE (2000) Prevention of the dystrophic phenotype in dystrophin/utrophin-deficient muscle following adenovirus-mediated transfer of a utrophin minigene. Gene Ther 7: 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christiana Dellorusso
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Robert W. Crawford
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jeffrey S. Chamberlain
    • 1
    • 3
  • Susan V. Brooks
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Departments of Human GeneticsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Departments of PhysiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle
  4. 4.Institute of GerontologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations