Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 55–67 | Cite as

Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Injection Drug Users Aged 18–25

  • Douglas D. Heckathorn
  • Salaam Semaan
  • Robert S. Broadhead
  • James J. Hughes
Article

Abstract

Researchers generally use nonprobability methods such as chain-referral sampling to study populations for which no sampling frame exists. Respondent-driven sampling is a new form of chain-referral sampling that was designed to reduce several sources of bias associated with this method, including those from the choice of initial participants, volunteerism, and masking. This study expands this method by introducing “steering incentives,” supplemental rewards for referral of members of a specific group, injection drug users (IDUs) aged 18–25. The results are based on an interrupted time series analysis in which 196 IDUs from Meriden, CT, were interviewed before introduction of the steering incentives, and another 190 were interviewed afterwards. The steering incentives increased the percentage of younger IDUs sampled by 70%. We compared recruitment patterns with institutional data and self-reported personal networks to determine representativeness and whether volunteerism or masking were present. The results indicated that steering incentives helped to increase recruitment of younger IDUs, that the sample was representative, and that both volunteerism and masking were modest.

injection drug user sampling methodology hidden population AIDS prevention HIV 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Braunstein, M. S. (1993). Sampling a hidden population of noninstitutionalized drug users. AIDS Education and Prevention, 59, 131-139.Google Scholar
  2. Broadhead, R. S., and Fox, K. J. (1993). Occupational health risks of harm reduction work: Combating AIDS among injection drug users. In G. G. Albrecht and R. Zimmerman (Eds.), Advances in medical sociology: The social and behavioral aspects of AIDS (pp. 123-142). Connecticut: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  3. Broadhead, R. S., and Heckathorn, D. D. (1994). AIDS prevention outreach among injection drug users: Agency problems and new approaches. Social Problems, 41, 473-495.Google Scholar
  4. Broadhead, R. S., Heckathorn, D. D., Grund, J.-P. C., Stern, L. S., and Anthony, D. L. (1995). Drug users versus outreach workers in combating AIDS: Preliminary results of a peer-driven intervention. Journal of Drug Issues, 25, 531-564.Google Scholar
  5. Broadhead, R. S., Heckathorn, D. D., Weakliem, D. L., Anthony, D. L., Madray, H., Mills, R. J., et al. (1998). Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: Results from a peer-driven intervention. Public Health Reports, 113(Suppl. 1), 42-57.Google Scholar
  6. Carley, K. (1999). AIDS Epidemiology Unit Surveillance Report. State of Connecticut Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (1997). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 9, 8-12.Google Scholar
  8. Coyle, S. L., Needle, R. H., and Normand, J. (1998). Outreachbased HIV prevention for injecting drug use: A review of published outcome data. Public Health Reports, 113(Suppl. 1), 19-30.Google Scholar
  9. Diagnosis and reporting of HIV and AIDS in states with integrated HIV and AIDS surveillance-United States, January 1994-June 1997. (1998). MMWR 47, 309-315.Google Scholar
  10. Erickson, B. H. (1979). Some problems of inference from chain data. Sociological Methodology, 10, 276-302.Google Scholar
  11. Frank,O., and Snijders,T. (1994). Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling. Journal of Official Statistics, 10, 53-67.Google Scholar
  12. Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174-199.Google Scholar
  13. Heckathorn, D. D., Broadhead, R. S., Anthony, D. L., and Weakliem, D. L. (1999). AIDS and social networks: Prevention through network mobilization. Sociological Focus, 32, 159-179.Google Scholar
  14. Heckathorn, D. D., Broadhead, R. S., and Sergeyev, B. (2001). A methodology for reducing respondent duplication and impersonation in samples of hidden populations. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 543-564.Google Scholar
  15. Holmberg, S. D. (1996). The estimated prevalence and incidence of HIV in 96 large US metropolitan areas. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 642-654.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, J., Williams, M. L., and Kotarba, J. A. (1990). Proactive and reactive strategies for delivering community-based HIV prevention services: An ethnographic analysis. AIDS Education and Prevention, 2, 191-200.Google Scholar
  17. Klovdahl, A. S. (1989). Urban social networks: Some methodological problems and possibilities. In M. Kochen (Ed.), The small world (pp. 176-210). New Jersey: Norwood.Google Scholar
  18. Liebman, J., and Thomas, C. (1992). Development of a sampling strategy to monitor trends in HIV risk behavior in out-of-treatment drug users. In Epidemiologic trends in drug abuse: Proceedings of the June 1992 Community Epidemiology Work Group (DHHS Publication No. ADM 92-1958, pp. 494-501). Maryland: Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration.Google Scholar
  19. McPherson, J. M., and Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 370-379.Google Scholar
  20. Rivera-Beckman, J. (1992). Community outreach in the time of AIDS: The San Francisco, Chicago and POCAAN models. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  21. Robles, R. R., Colon, H. M., and Freeman, D. H. (1993). Copping areas as sampling recruitment sites for out-of-treatment crack and injection drug users. Drugs and Society, 7, 91-105.Google Scholar
  22. Semaan, S., Des Jarlais, D., Sogalow, E., Ramirez, G., Sweat, M., Norman, L., and Needle, R. (1998). Meta-analysis of the impact of HIV risk reduction interventions on safer sex behaviors of drug users. Paper presented at the 12th World AIDS Conference in Geneva, Switzerland, June 30, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Spreen, M., and Zwaagstra, R. (1994). Personal network sampling, out degree analysis and multilevel analysis: Introducing the network concept in studies of hidden populations. International Sociology, 9, 475-491.Google Scholar
  24. Sudman, S., Sirken, M. G., and Cowan, C. D. (1988). Sampling rare and elusive populations. Science, 240, 991-996.Google Scholar
  25. Watters, J. K. (1993). The significance of sampling and understanding hidden populations. Drugs and Society, 7, 13-21.Google Scholar
  26. Watters, J., and Biernecki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36, 416-430.Google Scholar
  27. Wittes, J., and Sidel, V. W. (1968). A generalization of the simple capture-recapture model with applications to epidemiological research. Journal of Chronic Disease, 21, 287-301.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas D. Heckathorn
    • 1
  • Salaam Semaan
    • 2
  • Robert S. Broadhead
    • 3
  • James J. Hughes
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SociologyCornell UniversityIthaca
  2. 2.Behavioral Intervention Research Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS PreventionCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgia
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrs
  4. 4.Office of Institutional ResearchEastern Connecticut State UniversityWindham

Personalised recommendations