Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 212–216 | Cite as

The design and evaluation of a simulated‐patient teaching programme to develop the consultation skills of undergraduate pharmacy students

  • D. James
  • S. Nastasic
  • J.G. Davies
  • R. Horne


Objectives: This study aimed to identify the key skills and knowledge required for the delivery of an ideal patient consultation in order to develop a training programme (using simulated-patients) to teach consultation skills to undergraduate pharmacy students. Methods:Participants included all third year undergraduate Pharmacy students (MPharm, level III) at the School of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton (from October 1999 to March 2000). Working in groups of 12, students participated in two 4 hour seminars. A structured questionnaire was designed to assess students' perceptions of the difficulty of conducting a consultation and their confidence in delivering a structured consultation. Main outcome measures: Questionnaires were administered before and after delivery of the teaching programme to assess changes in students' confidence and ability to consult with patients.Results:Twelve volunteers satisfied the criteria set to serve as simulated patients and then received appropriate training. Six scenarios were developed which focused on the key skills and knowledge identified from the adherence and consultation skills literature. A total of 91 students participated in the programme (mean age=23 years, SD=4.5). Following participation in the programme students' perceived 'confidence' for conducting an effective consultation significantly increased (t=-5.9,p<0.01) while a statistically significant decrease was seen in students' perceived level of 'difficulty' when conducting a consultation (t=4.0, p<0.01).Conclusion: This study has shown that the use of a structured teaching programme improves students' perceptions of their ability and confidence in conducting an effective consultation. Providing skills training around the consultation process, using simulated patients, provides pharmacists with a good framework around which to practice pharmaceutical care.

Concordance Consultation skills Patient compliance Patient simulated teaching Skills training 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hargie ODW, Morrow NC. A survey of interpersonal skills teaching in pharmacy schools in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Am J Pharm Ed (1986);50:172-5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitehouse C, Morris P, Marks B. The role of actors in teaching communication. Med Educ (1984);18(4):262-8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McManus IC, Vincent CA, Thom S, Kidd J. Teaching communication skills to clinical students. BMJ (1993);306:1322-7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fallowfield L. The ideal consultation. B J Hosp Med (1992); 47(5):364-7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weinman J. providing written information for patients: psychological considerations. J Royal Soc Med (1990);33:303-5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kessler DA. Communicating with patients about their medications. New Eng J Med (1991);325(23):1650-2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leventhal L, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cog Persp Health Psych (1992);16:143-63.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horne R. Representations of medication and treatment: Advances in theory and measurement. In: Weinman J and Petrie KJ (eds). The patient's perception of illness and treatment: Current research and applications, Harwood Academic Press, Amsterdam, (1997);155-188.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maguire P. Can communication skills be taught? Brit J Hosp Med (1990);43:215-6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fletcher C. Listening and talking to patients III: The exposition. BMJ (1980);281:934-96.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodwin J. The importance of clinical skills. BMJ (1995); 310:1281-2.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McAvoy BR. Teaching clinical skills to medical students: the use of simulated patients and videotaping in general practice. Medical Education (1988);22:193-6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cushing A. Recruitment, selection & training of SPs, Clinical Skills Network Meeting, UCL, London, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Edwards A, Elwyn G, Gwyn R. General practice registrar response to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group. BMJ (1999);18:310 (7212):749-52.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horne R and Weinman J. Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosomatic Res (1999);47:6:555-67.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Concordance Working Party. From compliance to concordance: Achieving shared goals in medicine taking. Report published by The Royal Pharmaceutical Society and Merck Sharp & Down (1997).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Francis V, Korsch BM and Morris MJ. Gaps in doctor-patient communication. N Eng J M (1969);280(10):535-40Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    James D and Horne R. The role of patients' perceptions of illness in care-seeking behaviour. In: Gard P (Ed). A Behavioural Approach to Pharmacy Practice. Blackwells Science, Oxford. 2000;91-110.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P and Havelock P. An approach to teaching and learning. In: Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P and Havelock P (Eds). The Consultation (Oxford General Practice Series 6). Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, (2000);61-72.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    James D. Role of patients' perceptions of illness and treatment in myocardial infarction. PhD thesis (1999): University of Brighton.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hepler CD and Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm (1990);47:533-43.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Horne R. One to be taken as directed: Reflections on nonadherence (non-compliance). J Social and Administrative Pharmacy (1993);10(4):150-6. 216 Pharmacy World & Science Volume 23 No. 6 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. James
    • 1
  • S. Nastasic
    • 1
  • J.G. Davies
    • 1
  • R. Horne
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Pharmacy & Biomolecular SciencesUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Health Care ResearchUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations