Landscape Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 731–741 | Cite as

The effects of timber harvesting on the structure and composition of adjacent old-growth coast redwood forest, California, USA

  • William H. Russell
  • Cristina Jones


Data collected across timber harvest boundaries on nine sites within the Redwood National and State Park management area in California, USA, were used to estimate the effective size of old-growth coast redwood preserves. Fourteen variables related to stand structure and composition, wildlife habitat, and physical environment were significantly correlated to distance from the timber harvest boundary using multiple regression analysis. A maximum depth of edge influence of 200 m was determined for variables exhibiting a significant correlation to the distance from the harvest edge. A spatial analysis using ArcView indicated that 53% of the old growth preserved within the study area was influenced by edge conditions, leaving 47% as effective old-growth.

Edge effects geographical information system preserve redwood Sequoia sempervirens 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beedy, E.C. 1981. Bird communities and forest structure in the Sierra Nevada of California. Condor 83: 97–105.Google Scholar
  2. Brothers, T.S. 1993. Fragmentation and edge effects in central Indiana old-growth forests. Nat. Areas J. 13: 268–273.Google Scholar
  3. Burgess, R.L. and Sharpe, J.L. 1981. Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, D.M. and Nol, E. 1998. Edge and fragment size effects on the vegetation of deciduous forests in Ontario, Canada. Nat. Areas J. 18: 45–53.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, J., Franklin, J.F. and Spies, T.A. 1992. Vegetation responses to edge environments in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol. Appl. 2: 5167–5177.Google Scholar
  6. Diamond, J.M. 1975. The island dilemma: Lessons of biogeographic studies for the design of natural preserves. Biol. Cons. 7: 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franklin, J.J. and Forman, R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landsc. Ecol. 1: 5–18.Google Scholar
  8. Gates, E.F. and Gysel, L.W. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871–883.Google Scholar
  9. Hanley, T.A. 1983. Black-tailed deer, elk, and forest edge in a western Cascades watershed. J. Wildl. Manage. 47: 237–242.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, L.D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory an the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, L.D. 1988. Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Cons. Biol. 2: 330–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janzen, D.H. 1983. No park is an island: increase in interference from outside as park size decreases. Oikos 4: 402–410.Google Scholar
  13. Laurence, W.F. 1991. Edge effects in tropical forest fragments: application of a model for the design of nature preserves. Biol. Cons. 57: 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laurence, W.F. and Yensen, E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biol. Cons. 55: 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Marcot, B.G. and Meretsky, V.J. 1983. Shaping stands to enhance habitat diversity. J. Forestry 81: 526–528.Google Scholar
  17. Matlack, G.R. 1993. Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biol. Cons. 66: 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murcia, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Tree 10: 58–62.Google Scholar
  19. Oosting, H.J. 1948. The Study of Plant Communities: An Introduction to Plant Ecology. W.H. Freeman and Company. San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Patton, D.R. 1975. A diversity index for quantifying habitat edge. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 3: 171–173.Google Scholar
  21. Peterken, G.F. 1996. Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Pielou, E.C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Ripple, W.J., Bradshaw, G.A. and Spies, T.A. 1991. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biol. Cons. 57: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Russell, W.H. 2000. Ecology and Management of Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) Forests. In The Proceeding of the Conference on Restoration and Management of Coastal Redwood Forests: Jackson State Demonstration Forest. Edited by W. H. Russell, and C. Winslow. Mendocino Institute Publication, Fort Bragg, California, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Russell, W.H., McBride, J.R. and Carnell, K. 2000. Edge Effects and the Effective Size of Old-Growth Coast Redwood Preserves. In Proceedings: Wilderness Science in a Time of Change. Proc. RMRS-P-000. Edited by David N., Cole and F. Stephen, McCool. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Schonewald-Cox, C.M. and Bayless, J.W. 1986. The boundary model: A geographical analysis of design and conservation of nature preserves. Biol. Cons. 38: 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Young, A. and Mitchell, N. 1994. Microclimate and vegetation edge effects in a fragmented podocarp-broadleaf forest in New Zealand. Biol. Cons. 67: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USGS/WERC, Golden Gate Field StationFort CronkhiteSausalitoUSA
  2. 2.Redwood National ParkOrickUSA

Personalised recommendations