Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 306–314

Understanding and Predicting Drug Delivery from Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets Using the “Sequential Layer” Model

Article

Abstract

Purpose. The objectives of this work were (i) to study and understand the physicochemical phenomena which are involved in the swelling and drug release from hydrophilic matrix tablets using the “sequential layer” model; and (ii) to predict the effect of the initial radius, height and size of the tablets on the resulting drug release profiles.

Methods. Tablets were prepared by direct compression, using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) grades with different average molecular weights as matrix-forming polymers. The in vitro release of chlorpheniramine maleate, propranolol HCl, acetaminophen, theophylline and diclofenac sodium was studied in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 0.1 M HCl, respectively. The initial drug loading varied from 1 to 70%, while the radius and height of the tablets varied from 1 to 8 mm.

Results. The “sequential layer” model considers water and drug diffusion with non-constant diffusivities and moving boundary conditions, non-homogeneous polymer swelling, drug dissolution, and polymer dissolution. We showed that this model was able to predict the resulting drug release kinetics accurately in all cases.

Conclusions. The “sequential layer” model can be used to elucidate the swelling and drug release behavior from hydrophilic matrix tablets and to simulate the effect of the device geometry on the drug release patterns. Hence, it can facilitate the development of new pharmaceutical products.

hydrophilic matrix tablet diffusion swelling release mechanism modeling hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    P. Colombo. Swelling-controlled release in hydrogel matrices for oral route. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 11:37–57 (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Brannon-Peppas and N. A. Peppas. The equilibrium swelling behavior of porous and non-porous hydrogels. In L. Brannon-Peppas and R. S. Harland (eds.), Absorbent Polymer Technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990 pp. 67–102.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. T. Fan and S. K. Singh. Controlled Release: A Quantitative Treatment, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Siepmann and N. A. Peppas. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48:139–157 (2001).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Siepmann and N. A. Peppas. Mathematical modeling of controlled drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48:137–138 (2001).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Narasimhan. Mathematical models describing polymer dissolution: consequences for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48:195–210 (2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Siepmann, F. Lecomte, and Bodmeier. Diffusion-controlled drug delivery systems: calculation of the required composition to achieve desired release profiles. J. Control. Release 60:379–389 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Charlier, B. Leclerc, and Couarraze. Release of mifepristone from biodegradable matrices: experimental and theoretical evaluations. Int. J. Pharm. 200:115–120 (2000).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Siepmann and A. Goepferich. Mathematical modeling of bioerodible, polymeric drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48:229–247 (2001).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Siepmann, H. Kranz, R. Bodmeier, and N. A. Peppas. HPMC-matrices for controlled drug delivery: a new model combining diffusion, swelling and dissolution mechanisms and predicting the release kinetics. Pharm. Res. 16:1748–1756 (1999).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Siepmann, H. Kranz, N. A. Peppas, and R. Bodmeier. Calculation of the required size and shape of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices to achieve desired drug release profiles. Int. J. Pharm. 201:151–164 (2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Siepmann and N. A. Peppas. Hydrophilic matrices for controlled drug delivery: an improved mathematical model to predict the resulting drug release kinetics (the “sequential layer” model). Pharm. Res. 17:1290–1298 (2000).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Gao and P. E. Fagerness. Diffusion in HPMC gels. I. Determination of drug and water diffusivity by pulsed-field-gradient spin-echo NMR. Pharm. Res. 12:955–964 (1995).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Gao, P. R. Nixon, and J. W. Skoug. Diffusion in HPMC gels. II. Prediction of drug release rates from hydrophilic matrix extended-release dosage forms. Pharm. Res. 12:965–971 (1995).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. Katzhendler, A. Hoffman, A. Goldberger, and M. Friedman. Modeling of drug release from erodible tablets. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:110–115 (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. T. C. Ju, P. R. Nixon, and M. V. Patel. Drug release from hydrophilic matrices. 1. New scaling laws for predicting polymer and drug release based on the polymer disentanglement concentration and the diffusion layer. J. Pharm. Sci. 84:1455–1463 (1995).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. T. C. Ju, P. R. Nixon, M. V. Patel, and D. M. Tong. Drug release from hydrophilic matrices. 2. A mathematical model based on the polymer disentanglement concentration and the diffusion layer. J. Pharm. Sci. 84:1464–1477 (1995).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. T. C. Ju, P. R. Nixon, and M. V. Patel. Diffusion coefficients of polymer chains in the diffusion layer adjacent to a swollen hydrophilic matrix. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:1293–1298 (1997).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. A. Peppas and S. R. Lustig. Solute diffusion in hydrophilic network structures. In N. A. Peppas (ed.), Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy, Vol. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1986 pp. 57–84.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Y. Polishchuk and G. E. Zaikov. Multicomponent Transport in Polymer Systems for Controlled Release, Overseas Publishers Association, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Narasimhan and N. A. Peppas. Disentanglement and reptation during dissolution of rubbery polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 34:947–961 (1996).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Narasimhan and N. A. Peppas. On the importance of chain reptation in models of dissolution of glassy polymers. Macromolecules 29:3283–3291 (1996).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Narasimhan and N. A. Peppas. Molecular analysis of drug delivery systems controlled by dissolution of the polymer carrier. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:297–304 (1997).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Crank. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Fujita. Diffusion in polymer-diluent systems. Fortschr. Hochpolym.-Forsch. 3:1–47 (1961).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Streubel, J. Siepmann, N. A. Peppas, and R. Bodmeier. Bimodal drug release achieved with multi-layer matrix tablets: transport mechanisms and device design. J. Control. Release 69:455–468 (2000).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of PharmacyFreie Universitaet BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.School of Chemical EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette

Personalised recommendations