The Impact of Realignment on Utilization and Cost of Community-Based Mental Health Services in California

  • Richard Scheffler
  • Amy Zhang
  • Lonnie Snowden
Article

Abstract

Decentralization of California's public mental health system under program realignment has changed the utilization and cost of community-based mental health services. This study examined a sample of 75,951 users, representing 1.5 million adults who visited California's public mental health services during a 6-year period (FY 1988–1990 and FY 1992–1994). Regression analysis was performed to examine cost and utilization reduction over time, across regions, and across psychiatric diagnoses. Overall utilization and cost of community-based mental health services dropped significantly after the implementation of realignment. They were significantly lower for (a) 24-hour services in the urban industrialized Southern Region and (b) outpatient services in the agricultural Central Region of the state. Users diagnosed with mood disorders took a greater portion, but were associated with significantly less treatment and cost than other users in the post-realignment period. When local communities bear the financial risks and rewards, they find more efficient methods of delivering community-based mental health services.

community cost county decentralization utilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Callahan, J.J., Shepard, D.S., Beinecke, R.H., Larson, M.J., & Cavanaugh, D. (1995). Mental health/ substance abuse treatment in managed care: The Massachusetts Medicaid experience. Health Affairs, 14, 173.Google Scholar
  3. Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy. (1997). California county projections. Palo Alto, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Christianson, J.B., Manning, W., Lurie, N., Stoner, T.J., Gray, D.Z., Popkin, M., & Marriott, S. (1995). Utah's prepaid mental health plan: The first year. Health Affairs 14, 160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clements, J. (1985). California facts: A comprehensive look at California today. Dallas, TX: Clements Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Dickey, B., Norton, E.C., Normand, S., Azeni, H., Fisher, W., & Altaffer, F. (1995). Massachusetts Medicaid managed health care reform: Treatment for the psychiatrically disabled. Advances in Health Economics and Health Research, 15, 99.Google Scholar
  7. Frank, R.G., & Gaynor, M. (1994). Fiscal decentralization of public mental health care and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program on chronic mental illness. Milbank Quarterly, 72, 81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Masland, M.C. (1997). Local variation in response to decentralization of authority in California's public mental health system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. Okin, R.L. (1992). California's new state-local Program Realignment Act: An experiment in financing care. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 1143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Scheffler, R.M., Hu, T.-W., Bloom, J.R., Wallace, N.T., & Garrett, A.B. (1997, March). The effects of decentralization on mental health services costs in California, USA. Paper presented at the Economics of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Drugs Conference, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  11. Scheffler, R.M., Wallace, N.T., Hu, T.-W., Bloom, J.R., & Garrett, A.B. (1998). The effects of decentralization on mental health services costs in California. Mental Health Research Review, 5, 31.Google Scholar
  12. Snowden, L., Scheffler, R.M., & Zhang, A.Y. (1998). The impact of realignment on the user population in California's public mental health system. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  13. STATA [Statistical software]. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  14. Stein, L.I. (1989). Wisconsin's system of mental health financing. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 43, 29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stoner, T., Manning, W., Christianson, J., Gray, D.Z., & Marriott, S. (1997). Expenditures for mental health services in the Utah prepaid mental health plan. Health Care Financing Review, 18, 73.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Scheffler
    • 1
  • Amy Zhang
    • 2
  • Lonnie Snowden
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Policy and Management Division, School of Public HealthUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley
  2. 2.School of MedicineCase Western Reserve UniversityCleveland
  3. 3.School of Social WelfareUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations