Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 7–32 | Cite as

Recovering from Homelessness: Determining the “Quality of Sobriety” in a Transitional Housing Program

  • Gwendolyn A. DordickEmail author


Recent years have seen fundamental shifts in the objectives and delivery of assistance to the homeless. An early emphasis on emergency shelter and monetary housing assistance has been replaced by a focus on programs designed to blend shelter with an array of social services. In most instances, however, programs combining shelter and social services are designed as transitional; that is, they are intended to help homeless individuals and families move from a position of dependence to one where they can live “independently.” The emphasis in transitional housing programs is on making homeless people “housing ready.” This paper concerns the process of assessing “housing readiness” as observed during eighteen months of fieldwork in a federally supported transitional housing program for formerly homeless single adults. The detailed case study that follows supports three important findings. First, there was virtual unanimity among staff and residents that substance abuse was the cause of their homelessness and the key to its solution. Second, success within the program was defined and operationalized along very specific but well understood normative dimensions that have little to do with the material circumstances in which residents find themselves and everything to do with “recovery.” Third, “recovery”—the key to housing readiness in this environment—was measured not by objective measures, i.e., number of months sober, but rather by what was widely referred to as one's “quality of sobriety,” a subjective and consequently often hotly debated measure of attitude and outlook only loosely related to demonstrable abstinence from alcohol. This last finding, that ultimately housing readiness is a subjective judgment, both increases the discretion of shelter staff and generates a systematic disattention to the individual economic issues that are fundamental to an exit from homelessness.

homelessness housing policy recovery sobriety 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Annis, H. M., & Davis, C. S. (1989). Relapse prevention. In R. K. Hester & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives (pp. 170-182). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, A. S., & Burnes, D. W. (1993). A nation in denial: The truth about homelessness. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dordick, G. A. (1997). Something left to lose: Personal relations and survival among New York's homeless. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dordick, G. A. (unpublished manuscript). The new architecture of dependency: Local knowledge and the construction of a homeless housing market.Google Scholar
  5. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Fischer, P. L., & Breakey, W. R. (1991). The epidemiology of alcohol, drug, and mental disorders among homeless persons. American Psychologist, 46, 1115-1128.Google Scholar
  7. Gerstel, N., Bogard, C. J., McConnell, J. J., & Schwartz, M. (1996). The therapeutic incarceration of homeless families. Social Service Review, 70, 543-572.Google Scholar
  8. Gray, M. (1993). Relapse prevention. In S. L. A. Straussner (Ed.), Clinical work with substance-abusing clients (pp. 351-368). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jencks, C. (1994). The homeless. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Marcuse, P. (1990). Homelessness and housing policy. In C. M. L. Caton (Ed.), Homeless in America (pp. 139-159). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. O'Flaherty, B. (1996). Making room: The economics of homelessness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Piliavin, I., Wright, B. R. E., Mare, R. D., & Westerfelt, A. H. (1996). Exits from and returns to homelessness. Social Service Review, 70, 33-37.Google Scholar
  13. Rossi, P. H. (1989). Down and out in America: The origins of homelessness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Snow, D., & Anderson, L. (1993). Down on their luck: A study of homeless street people. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Snow, D., Baker, S. G., Anderson, L., & Martin, M. (1986). The myth of pervasive mental illness among the homeless. Social Problems, 33, 407-423.Google Scholar
  16. Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  17. Stone, M. E. (1993). Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Straussner, S. L. A. (Ed.), Clinical work with substance-abusing clients. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991). Housing initiatives for homeless people with alcohol and other drug problems: Proceedings of a national conference.Google Scholar
  20. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1994a). Continuum of care. Office of Community Planning and Development.Google Scholar
  21. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1994b). Priority: Home! The federal plan to break the cycle of homelessness.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1995). Policy development and research report to Congress. Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Programs.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1996). Testimony of Secretary Henry G. Cisneros before the House VA/HUD Appropriations Subcommittee on the department's FY 1997 budget request.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. General Accounting Office (1999a). Types of clients and the percentage of supportive housing program applicants that serve them. Report to Congressional Requesters RECD, B-281481.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. General Accounting Office (1999b). Homelessness: Grant applicants' characteristics and views on the Supportive Housing Program. Report to Congressional Requesters RECD-99-239.Google Scholar
  26. Wittman, F. D. (1993). Affordable housing for people with alcohol and other drug problems. Contemporary Drug Problems, 20, 541-609.Google Scholar
  27. Wong, Y-L. I., & Piliavin, I. (1997). A dynamic analysis of homeless transitions. Social Problems, 44, 408-423.Google Scholar
  28. Wright, B. R. E. (1997). Pathways off the street: Homeless people and their use of resources. Focus, 19, 70-74.Google Scholar
  29. Wright, J., Rubin, B., & Devine, J. (1998). Beside the golden door: Policy, politics and the homeless. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  30. Wuthnow, R. (1996). Sharing the journey: Support groups and America's new quest for community. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyHarvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations