Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 299–308

Demographic Characteristics of Female Mottled Sculpin, Cottus Bairdi, in the Coweeta Creek Drainage, North Carolina

  • Gary D. Grossman
  • Kathleen McDaniel
  • Robert E. RatajczakJr.

Abstract

We quantified: (1) growth rate, (2) length-mass relationships, (3) size- and age-specific fecundity, (4) egg size-frequencies, and (5) size- and age-specific egg diameter relationships for reproductively active female C. bairdi from one of the southern-most extant populations of this species (Coweeta Creek drainage, North Carolina). Gravid females were collected during February and March in 1993–1995, and 1998. Cottus bairdi reached an age of 7+ and 79 mm standard length. The youngest and smallest gravid female collected was a 41 mm 1+ individual. Mature 1+ females were not uncommon and we collected 21 during our study. All females older than age 2 were mature. Mean fecundity for C. bairdi at Coweeta was 71 eggs (range 9–166 eggs). We found significant positive relationships between fecundity and female length, weight and age. Female length and weight also significantly affected mean egg diameter, although the relationship was not linear. Neither female size or age significantly affected mean maximum egg diameters. Female C. bairdi from the Coweeta Creek drainage possess a unique suite of reproductive characteristics that may represent adaptations to the local selective regime or ecophenotypic variation.

ova egg reproduction fecundity fecundity-length relationships fecundity-age relationships ova body-size relationships egg diameters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Bagenal, T.B. & E. Braum. 1978. Eggs and early life history. pp. 165–201. In:T.B. Bagenal (ed.) Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in FreshWaters, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, J.E. 1952. Life history and ecology of the sculpin Cottus bairdi punctulatus in southwestern Montana. Copeia1952: 243–255.Google Scholar
  3. Breder, C.M & D.E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes. Natural HistoryPress, Garden City. 941 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Dehaven, J.E., D.J. Stouder, R. Ratajczak, T.J. Welch & G.D. Grossman. 1993.Reproductive timing of three fish in a southern Appalachian stream. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish 1: 104–111.Google Scholar
  5. Downhower, J.F. & L. Brown. 1980. Mate preferences of female mottled sculpins, Cottus bairdi. Anim. Beh.28: 728–734.Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, M.C., M.K. Crawford, J.C. Barrett, D.E. Facey, M.G. Flood, J. Hill, D.J. Stouder & G.D. Grossman. 1988. Fish assemblage stability in a southern Appalachian stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 1949–1958.Google Scholar
  7. Girard, C. 1850. Contributions to the natural history of the freshwater fishes of America. I. Amonograph of the cottids. Smithsonian Institution Contribution to Knowledge 3: 1–80.Google Scholar
  8. Grossman, G.D. 1979.Demographic characteristics of an intertidal bay goby (Lepidogobius lepidus). Env. Biol. Fish. 4: 207–218.Google Scholar
  9. Grossman, G.D., J.F. Dowd & M.C. Crawford. 1990. Assemblage stability in stream fishes: a review. Environ.Manage. 14: 661–671.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, G.D. & M.C. Freeman. 1987. Microhabitat use in a stream fishassemblage. J. Zool. Soc. (London) 212: 151–176.Google Scholar
  11. Grossman, G.D., J. Hill, & J.T. Petty. 1995a.Observations on habitat structure, population regulation, and habitat use with respect to evolutionarily significant units: a landscape approach for lotic systems. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17: 381–391.Google Scholar
  12. Grossman, G.D., R. Ratajczak, Jr. & M.C. Crawford 1995b. Do rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) induce microhabitat shifts in mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi). Copeia 1995: 343–353.Google Scholar
  13. Grossman, G.D. & R.E. Ratajczak, Jr. 1998. Long-term patterns of microhabitatuse by fish in a southern Appalachian stream from 1983 to 1992: effects of hydrologic period, season, and fish length. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish 7: 108–131.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, G.D., R.E. Ratajczak, Jr., M. Crawford & M.C. Freeman. 1998.Assemblage organization in stream fishes: effects of environmental variation and interspecific interactions. Ecol. Monogr. 68: 395–420.Google Scholar
  15. Hahn, H.W. 1927. The history of the germ cell of Cottus bairdi Girard. J. Morph. Physiol.43: 427–497.Google Scholar
  16. Jenkins, R.E. & N.M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. AmericanFisheries Society, Bethesda. 1080 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Ludwig, G.M. & E.L. Lange. 1975. The relationship of length, age, and age-length interaction to the fecundity of the northern mottled sculpin, Cottus b. bairdi. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 105: 64–67.Google Scholar
  18. Ludwig, G.M. & C.R. Norden. 1969. Age, growth, and reproduction of the northern mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdibairdi). Milwaukee Public Museum Occasional Paper 2: 1–67.Google Scholar
  19. Nagel, J.W. 1980. Life history of the mottledsculpin, Cottus bairdi, in northern Tennessee (Osteichthyes: Cottidae). Brimleyana 4: 115–121.Google Scholar
  20. Patten, B.G.1970. Spawning and fecundity of seven species of northwest American cottus. Amer. Midl. Nat. 85: 493–506.Google Scholar
  21. Petty, J.T. 1998. Mottled sculpin in a dynamic landscape: linking environmental heterogeneity, individual behaviors, andpopulation dynamics in a southern Appalachian stream. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens. 156 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Petty, J.T & G.D. Grossman. 1996. Patch selection by mottled sculpin (Pisces: Cottidae) in a southern Appalachianstream. Freshwat. Biol. 35: 261–276.Google Scholar
  23. Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biologicalstatistics of fish populations. Department of the Environment, Fisheries, and Marine Service, Ottawa. 382 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Rohde, F.C. & R.G. Arndt. 1981. Life history of a coastal plain population of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi (Osteichthyes: Cottidae), in Delaware. Brimleyana 7: 69–94.Google Scholar
  25. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide; statistics. Cary 956 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Simon, J.R. & R.C. Brown. 1943. Observations on the spawning of the sculpin. Copeia. 1943: 41–42.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, B.G. 1922. Notes on the nesting habits of Cottus. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts & Letters 2: 212–224.Google Scholar
  28. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River. 880 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Swank, W.T. & D.A. Crossley. 1987. Forest hydrology and ecologyat Coweeta. Springer-Verlag, New York. 469 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, A., J.T Petty & G.D. Grossman. 2001. Multi-scale effects of resource patchiness on foraging behaviour and habitat use by longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae. Freshwat. Biol. 46: 145–161.Google Scholar
  31. Von Bertalanffy, L. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growthlaws. II). Hum. Biol. 10: 181–212.Google Scholar
  32. Wootton, R.J. 1998. Ecology of teleost fishes. Chapman & Hall, London. 392 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Zar, J.M. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.931 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Zarbock, W.M. 1952. Life history of the Utah sculpin, Cottus bairdi semiscaber (Cope), in Logan River, Utah.Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 81: 249–259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary D. Grossman
    • 1
  • Kathleen McDaniel
    • 1
  • Robert E. RatajczakJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.D.B. Warnell School of Forest ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations