Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 1005–1017 | Cite as

Mechanical characterization of soft materials using high speed photography and split hopkinson pressure bar technique

  • A. Sharma
  • A. Shukla
  • R. A. Prosser


High-speed photography in conjunction with the viscoelastic Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) technique was used to study soft material behavior under dynamic loading conditions. The real-time strains recorded using high speed photography were also used for validating the existing viscoelastic SHPB model. Polyurethane, sculpturing clay, sorbothane and bologna were tested as examples of soft materials. The dynamic compressive strength of clay increased by 4 orders of magnitude compared to the static compressive strength. The dynamic strength of sorbothane increased by 3 orders of magnitude compared to the manufacturer specified static values. Only dynamic experiments, between strain rates of 2700 and 3700/sec, were performed on bologna. All the four materials showed very high strain-rate dependence. The tested materials showed similar stress-strain plots. Clay, Sorbothane and Bologna were very compliant up to 30 to 35% strains followed by a stiffer region where the stresses increased rapidly to the maximum values. The specimens were in stress equilibrium for significant time durations and specimen peak stresses where achieved during this period.


  1. 1.
    S. J. BELL, Structural Materials Center Report 325–331, DRA Holton Health, UK. (1996).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. J. COOPER, Journal of Biomechanics 24(5) (1991) 273.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. KOLSKY, “StressWaves in Solids” (Dover Publications, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. DAVIES and S. C. HUNTER, Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 11(1963) 155.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. T. GRAY and W. R. BLUMENTHAL, 2000, in “ASM Handbook, Vol. 8: Mechanical Testing and Evaluation” (ASM International, 2000) p. 488.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. T. GRAY, W. R. BLUMENTHAL, C. P. TRUJILLO and R. W. CARPENTER, Journal De Physique IV, France, Colloq. C3 7 (1997) 523.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. J. FORRESTAL, W. CHEN and B. ZHANG, Experimental Mechanics 39(2) (1999).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. WANG, K. LABIBES, Z. AZARI and G. PLUVINAGE, International Journal of Impact Mechanics 15 (1994) 669.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. ZHAO, G. GARY and J. R. KLEPACZKO, ibid. 19 (1997) 319.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. SAWAS, N. S. BRAR and R. A. BROCKMAN, Experimental Mechanics 38(2) (1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. BACON, ibid. 38(4) (1998).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. L. FOURNEY, private communication.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. F. GRAFF, “Wave Motion in Elastic Solids” (Dover Publications, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. WILSON, Master's Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D695, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. C. FUNG, “Biomechanics Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues” (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. T. RAMESH and S. NARSIMHAN, International Journal of Solids and Structures 33 (1996) 3723.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Sharma
    • 1
  • A. Shukla
    • 1
  • R. A. Prosser
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  2. 2.Soldier System CenterUS Army NatickNatickUSA

Personalised recommendations