Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 289–333 | Cite as

The Negative Concord Puzzle Revisited

  • Elena Herburger
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates Negative Concord, arguing that it results from a systematic lexical ambiguity: the items that participate in Negative Concord ("n-words" in Laka's 1990 terminology) are ambiguous between negative polarity items and their genuinely negative counterparts. I try to show that on empirical grounds the proposed account compares favorably with other analyses that shy away from ambiguity. I furthermore suggest that the ambiguity is not implausible conceptually because it can be viewed as reflecting an intermediate stage of the Jespersen Cycle. Negative Concord can be observed in many languages. The data discussed here are taken from Romance, primarily Spanish.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barker, Laura and Elena Herburger: 2000, ‘Even Even Can Be an NPI: Evidence from Spanish’, manuscript, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  2. Bosque, Ignacio: 1980, Sobre la Negación, Cátedra, Madrid.Google Scholar
  3. Bosque, Ignacio: 1992, ‘La Negación y el Principio de las Categorías Vacías’, manuscript, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, Greg: 1980, ‘Polarity Sensitive Any Is Existential’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 799–809.Google Scholar
  5. Déprez, Viviane: 1997, ‘Two Types of Negative Concord’, Probus 9, 103–143.Google Scholar
  6. Déprez, Viviane: 2000, ‘Parallel (A)symmetries and the Internal Structure of N–words’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 253–342.Google Scholar
  7. Fauconnier, Gilles: 1975: ‘Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structures’, Linguistic Inquiry 6, 353–357.Google Scholar
  8. Heim, Irene: 1984, ‘A Note on Negative Polarity Items and Downward Entailingness’, Proceedings from NELS 14, pp. 98–107. GLSA, University of Massachussetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  9. Herburger, Elena: 1998, ‘Spanish N–words: Ambivalent Behavior or Ambivalent Nature?’, in U. Sauerland and O. Percus (eds.), The Interpretive Tract (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25) pp. 86–102. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Herburger, Elena: 2000, What Counts: Focus and Quantification, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  11. Horn, Laurence: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
  12. Horn, Laurence: to appear, ‘ANY and (–) EVER, Free Choice and Free Relatives’, to appear in the Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Jespersen, Otto: 1917, Negation in English and Other Languages, A.F. Høst, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  14. Labov, Williams: 1972, ‘Negative Attraction and Negative Concord’, Language 46, 773–818.Google Scholar
  15. Ladusaw, William: 1979, ‘Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations’, PhD dissertation, University of Texas. Published in 1980 by Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Ladusaw, William: 1992, ‘Expressing Negation’, in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 2, pp. 237–259. The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  17. Ladusaw, William: 1993, ‘Negation, Indefinites, and the Jespersen Cycle’, in J. Guenter, B. Kaiser and C. Zall (eds.), Proceedings of BLS 19, pp. 437–446. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Lahiri, Utpal: 1998, 'Focus and Negative Polarity in Hindi, Natural Language Semantics 6, 57–123.Google Scholar
  19. Laka, Itziar: 1990, ‘Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections’, PhD dissertation, MIT. Published in 1994 by Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, Yun Sook and Laurence Horn: 1994, ‘Any as Indefinite plus Even’, manuscript, Yale University.Google Scholar
  21. Linebarger, Marcia: 1987, ‘Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 186–195.Google Scholar
  22. Longobardi, Giuseppe: 1991, ‘Island Effects and Parasite Constructions’, in J.–T. Huang and R. May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure, pp. 149–196. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, Ana Maria: 2000, ‘Polarity Items in Romance: Underspecification and Lexical Change’, in S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas, and A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, pp. 191–219. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Posner, Rebecca: 1984, ‘Double Negatives, Negative Polarity and Negative Incorporation in Romance: A Historical and Comparative View’, Transactions of the Philological Society 1984, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  25. Progovac, Ljiljana: 1988. ‘A Binding Approach to Polarity Sensitivity’, PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  26. Rooth, Mats: 1985, ‘Association with Focus’, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  27. Rullmann, Hotze: 1997, ‘Even, Polarity and Scope’, manuscript, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
  28. Suñer, Margarita: 1995, ‘Negative Elements, Island Effects and Resumptive No’, The Linguistic Review 12, 233–373.Google Scholar
  29. Uribe–Etxebarría, Myriam: 1994, ‘Interface Licensing Conditions on Negative Polarity Items: A Theory of Polarity and Tense Interactions’, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
  30. Vallduví, Enric: 1994, ‘Polarity Items, N–words, and Minimizers in Catalan and Spanish’, Probus 6, 263–294.Google Scholar
  31. Van der Wouden, Ton and Frans Zwarts: 1993, ‘A Semantic Analysis of Negative Concord,’ in U. Lahiri and A. Wyner (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 3, pp. 202–219. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  32. Van der Wouden, Ton: 1997, Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  33. Zanuttini, Raffaella: 1991, ‘Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages’, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  34. Zanuttini, Raffaella: 1997, Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Zubizarreta, María Luisa: 1998, Focus, Prosody and Word Order, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Herburger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Spanish and PortugueseGeorgetown UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations