Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

Does Television Exposure Affect Emerging Adults' Attitudes and Assumptions About Sexual Relationships? Correlational and Experimental Confirmation

  • L. Monique Ward
Article

Abstract

Because concern is frequently raised that TV's abundant yet stereotypical portrayals of sexual relationships may mislead young viewers, this study examined the effects of both regular viewing habits and experimental exposure on students' conceptions about sexual relationships. A multiethnic sample of 259 undergraduates aged 18–22 was assigned to view a set of clips depicting either 1 of 3 sexual stereotypes or neutral, nonsexual content. Participants then completed measures assessing their attitudes about sexual roles and relationships, their assumptions about the sexual experiences of their peers, and their regular viewing habits. Both correlational and experimental connections emerged between TV viewing and students' sexual attitudes and assumptions. More frequent and more involved viewing were repeatedly associated with students' support of the sexual stereotypes surveyed. Similarly, women exposed to clips representing a particular sexual stereotype were more likely to endorse that notion than were women exposed to nonsexual content. Finally, both experimental exposure and aspects of regular viewing significantly predicted students' sexual attitudes and assumptions, even with demographics and previous sexual experiences controlled.

television media sexuality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Andre, T., Frevert, R. L., and Schuchmann, D. (1989). From whom have college students learned about sex? Youth Soc. 20: 241–268.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am. Psychol. 55: 469–480.Google Scholar
  3. Baran, S. J. (1976). How TV and film portrayals affect sexual satisfaction in college students. Journalism Q. 53: 468–473.Google Scholar
  4. Bauder, D. (1998). Cable ratings top networks. The Washington Post, July 8, p. D7.Google Scholar
  5. Blosser, B. J. (1988). Ethnic differences in children's media use. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 32: 453–470.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. D., and Newcomer, S. F. (1991). Television viewing and adolescents’ sexual behavior. J. Homosexuality 21: 77–91.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J. D., and Steele, J. R. (1995). Sex and the Mass Media. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, J., and Rockwell, S. C. (1994). Effects of massive exposure to sexually oriented prime-time television programming on adolescents’ moral judgment. In Zillman, D., Bryant, J., and Huston, A. C. (eds.), Media, Children, and the Family: Social Scientific, Psychodynamic, and Clinical Perspectives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 183–195.Google Scholar
  9. Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L., and Strouse, J. S. (1993). Media exposure and perceptions of sexual behaviors: The cultivation hypothesis moves to the bedroom. In Greenberg, B. S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (eds.), Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ, pp. 225–247.Google Scholar
  10. Calfin, M. S., Carroll, J. L., and Shmidt, J. (1993). Viewing music-videotapes before taking a test of premarital sexual attitudes. Psychol. Rep. 72: 475–481.Google Scholar
  11. Carveth, R., and Alexander, A. (1985). Soap opera viewing motivation and the cultivation process. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 29: 259–273.Google Scholar
  12. Christopher, F. S. (2001). To Dance the Dance: A Symbolic Interactional Exploration of Premarital Sexuality. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, D. J., and Lederman, L. C. (1998). Navigating the freedoms of college life: Students talk about alcohol, gender, and sex. In Roth, N. L., and Fuller, L. K. (eds.), Women and AIDS: Negotiating Safer Practices, Care, and Representation. The Hawforth Pres, NewYork.Google Scholar
  14. Day, R. D. (1992). The transition to first intercourse among racially and culturally diverse youth. J. Marr. Fam. 52: 749–762.Google Scholar
  15. DiOrio, C., Kelley, M., and Hockenberry, M. (1999). Communication about sexual issues: Mothers, fathers, and friends. J. Adolesc. Health 24: 181–189.Google Scholar
  16. Dorr, A. (1986). Television and Children: A Special Medium for a Special Audience. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Durham, M. (1998). Dilemmas of desire: Representations of adolescent sexuality in two teen magazines. Youth Soc. 29: 369–389.Google Scholar
  18. Fishbein, M., and Middlestadt, S. E. (1989). Using the theory of reasoned action as a framework for understanding and changing AIDS-related behaviors. In Mayo, M., Albee, G., and Schneider, F. (eds.), Primary Prevention of AIDS: Psychological Approaches. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 93–110.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, J. D. (1988). Possible effects of reference group-based social influence on AIDS-risk behavior and AIDS prevention. Am. Psychol. 43: 914–920.Google Scholar
  20. Fox, G. (1977). Sex-role attitudes as predictors of contraceptive use among unmarried university students. Sex Roles 3: 265–283.Google Scholar
  21. Galambos, N., Peterson, A., Richards, M., and Gitelson, I. B. (1985). The attitudes toward women scale for adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles 13: 343–354.Google Scholar
  22. Garner, A., Sterk, H. M., and Adams, S. (1998). Narrative analysis of sexual etiquette in teenage magazines. J. Commun. 48: 59–78.Google Scholar
  23. Gow, J. (1995). Reconsidering gender roles on MTV: Depictions in the most popular music videos on the early 1990s. Commun. Rep. 9: 151–161.Google Scholar
  24. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In Bryant, J., and Zillman, D. (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
  25. Greenberg, B. S. (1993). Race differences in television and movie behaviors. In Greenberg, B. S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (eds.), Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ, pp. 145–152.Google Scholar
  26. Greenberg, B. S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (1993). Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, B. S., and Busselle, R. W. (1996). Soap operas and sexual activity: A decade later. J. Commun. 46: 153–160.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberg, B. S., Linsangan, R., and Soderman, A. (1993). Adolescents’ reactions to television sex. In Greenberg, B. S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (eds.), Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ, pp. 177–224.Google Scholar
  29. Greeson, L. E., and Williams, R. A. (1986). Social implications of music videos for youth: An analysis of the content and effects of MTV. Youth Soc. 18: 177–189.Google Scholar
  30. Haferkamp, C. J. (1999). Beliefs about relationships in relation to television viewing, soap opera viewing, and self-monitoring. Curr. Psychol. 18: 193–204.Google Scholar
  31. Harrison, K. (1997). Does interpersonal attraction to thin media personalities promote eating disorders? J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 41: 478–500.Google Scholar
  32. Higgins, E. T., and King, G. A. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In Cantor, N., and Kihlstrom, J. F. (eds.), Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 69–122.Google Scholar
  33. Huston, A. C., Wartella, E., and Donnerstein, E. (1998). Measuring the Effects of Sexual Content in the Media. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Jo, E., and Berkowitz, L. (1994). A priming effect analysis on media influences: An update. In Bryant, J., and Zillman, D. (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
  35. Kalof, L. (1999). The effects of gender and music video imagery on sexual attitudes. J. Soc. Psychol. 139: 378–385.Google Scholar
  36. Kunkel, D., Cope, K. M., and Biely, E. (1999). Sexual messages on television: Comparing findings from 3 studies. J. Sex Res. 36: 230–236.Google Scholar
  37. Kunkel, D., Cope, K. M., and Colvin, C. (1996). Sexual Messages on Family Hour Television: Content and Context. Oakland & Menlo Park, CA: Children Now and Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Levy, M. R. (1983). Conceptualizing and measuring aspects of audience ‘activity.' Journalism Q. 60: 109–115.Google Scholar
  39. Levy, M. R., and Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Commun. Res. 11: 51–78.Google Scholar
  40. Lowry, D. T., and Towles, D. E. (1989). Soap opera portrayals of sex, contraception, and sexually transmitted diseases. J. Commun. 39: 76–83.Google Scholar
  41. MacCorquodale, P. (1984). Gender roles and premarital contraception. J. Marr. Fam. 46: 57–63.Google Scholar
  42. Metzler, C. W., Noell, J., and Biglan, A. (1992). The validation of a construct of high-risk sexual behavior in heterosexual adolescents. J. Adolesc. Res. 7: 233–249.Google Scholar
  43. Oliver, M. B., and Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 114: 29–51.Google Scholar
  44. Olson, B. (1994). Sex and the soaps: A comparative content analysis of health issues. Journalism Q. 71: 840–850.Google Scholar
  45. Page, R., Hammermeister, J. J., and Scanlan, A. (2000). Everybody's not doing it: Misperceptions of college students’ sexual activity. Am. J. Health Behav. 24: 387–394.Google Scholar
  46. Perse, E. M. (1986). Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 30: 175–193.Google Scholar
  47. Pistella, C. L. Y., and Bonati, F. A. (1998). Communication about sexual behavior among adolescent women, their family, and peers. Fam. Soc.: J. Contemp. Hum. Serv. March–April, 206–211.Google Scholar
  48. Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., and Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. J. Soc. Issues 49: 11–29.Google Scholar
  49. Potter, W. J. (1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 30: 159–174.Google Scholar
  50. Rubin, A. M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. J. Commun. 34: 67–77.Google Scholar
  51. Rubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In Bryant, J., and Zillman, D. (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 417–436.Google Scholar
  52. Rubin, A. M., and Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and television news gratifications. Commun. Res. 14: 58–84.Google Scholar
  53. Rudman, L. A., and Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. J Exp. Soc. Psychol. 31: 493–517.Google Scholar
  54. Sapolsky, B. S., and Tabarlet, J. O. (1991). Sex in primetime television: 1979 versus 1989. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 35: 505–516.Google Scholar
  55. Schwartz, P., and Rutter, V. (1998). The Gender of Sexuality. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  56. Scott-Jones, D., and White, A. (1990). Correlates of sexual activity in early adolescence. J. Early Adolesc. 10: 221–238.Google Scholar
  57. Sherman, B. L., and Dominick, J. R. (1986). Violence and sex in music videos: TV and rock ‘n’ roll. J. Commun. 36: 79–93.Google Scholar
  58. Strasburger, V. (1995). Adolescents and the Media: Medical and Psychological Impact. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  59. Strouse, J. S., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (1987). Media exposure and the sexual attitudes and behaviors of college students. J. Sex Educ. Ther. 13: 43–51.Google Scholar
  60. Strouse, J. S., Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L., and Long, E. C. (1995). Gender and family as moderators of the relationship between music video exposure and adolescent sexual permissiveness. Adolescence 30: 505–521.Google Scholar
  61. Strouse, J. S., Goodwin, M. P., and Roscoe, B. (1994). Correlates of attitudes toward sexual harrassment among early adolescents. Sex Roles 31: 559–577.Google Scholar
  62. Sun, S.-W., and Lull, J. (1986). The adolescent audience for music videos and why they watch. J. Commun. 36: 115–125.Google Scholar
  63. Tolman, D. L., and Higgins, T. (1996). How being a good girl can be bad for girls. In Maglin, N. B., and Perry, D. (eds.), Good Girls/Bad Girls: Women, Sex, Violence and Power in the 1990s. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 205–225.Google Scholar
  64. Walsh-Childers, K., and Brown, J. D. (1993). Adolescents’ acceptance of sex-role stereotypes and television viewing. In Greenberg, B.S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (eds.), Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ, pp. 117–133.Google Scholar
  65. Ward, L. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. J. Youth Adolesc. 24: 595–615.Google Scholar
  66. Ward, L. M., and Rivadeneyra, R. (1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. J. Sex Res. 36: 237–249.Google Scholar
  67. Ward, L., and Wyatt, G. (1994). The effects of childhood sexual messages on African-American and White women's adolescent sexual behavior. Psychol. Women Q. 18: 183–201.Google Scholar
  68. Whitaker, D., and Miller, K. (2000). Parent-adolescent discussions about sex and condoms: Impact on peer influences of sexual risk behavior. J. Adolesc. Res. 15: 251–273.Google Scholar
  69. Winslow, R. W., Franzini, L. R., and Hwang, J. (1992). Perceived peer norms, casual sex, and AIDS risk prevention. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22: 1809–1827.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Monique Ward
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations