Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 31–44 | Cite as

The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents

  • Gustavo Carlo
  • Brandy A. Randall


The correlates and structure of prosocial behaviors in late adolescents were examined using a newly constructed, multidimensional measure. In Study 1, 249 college students (145 women; M age = 19.9 years) were administered the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM) which assesses 6 types of prosocial behaviors: altruistic, compliant, emotional, dire, public, and anonymous. Measures of sympathy, perspective taking, personal distress, social desirability, global prosocial behaviors, social responsibility, ascription of responsibility, vocabulary skills, and prosocial moral reasoning were also completed. Test-retest reliability and further validity of the PTM were demonstrated in Study 2 with a sample of 40 college students (28 women; M age = 22.9 years). Results from both studies yielded evidence of adequate reliability and validity of the PTM and support the notion of differentiated forms of helping.

prosocial behaviors measurement individual differences behaviors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th edn., Vol. 2). McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, pp. 282–316.Google Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D., Bolen, M. H., Cross, J. A., and Neuringer-Benefiel, H. E. (1986). Where is the altruism in the altruistic personality? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 212–220.Google Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, L., and Lutterman, K. G. (1968). The traditional socially responsible personality. Public Opinion Q. 32: 169–185.Google Scholar
  5. Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychol. Bull. 88: 1–45.Google Scholar
  6. Borgatta, E. P., and Corsini, R. J. (1960). The Quick Word Test (QWT). J. Educ. Res. 54: 15–20.Google Scholar
  7. Bryant, B. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Dev. 53: 413–425.Google Scholar
  8. Buhrmester, D., Goldfarb, J., and Cantrell, D. (1992). Self-presentation when sharing with friends and nonfriends. J. Early Adolesc. 12: 61–79.Google Scholar
  9. Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., and Knight, G. P. (1992). An objective measure of adolescents’ prosocial moral reasoning. J. Res. Adolesc. 2: 331–349.Google Scholar
  10. Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., and Speer, A. L. (1991a). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61: 450–458.Google Scholar
  11. Carlo, G., Fabes, R. A., Laible, D., and Kupanoff, K. (1999a). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior II: The role of social and contextual influences. J. Early Adolesc. 19: 133–147.Google Scholar
  12. Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., Eisenberg, N., and Rotenberg, K. J. (1991b). Cognitive processes and prosocial behaviors among children: The role of affective attributions and reconciliations. Dev. Psychol. 27: 456–461.Google Scholar
  13. Carlo, G., Roesch, S. C., and Koller, S. H. (1999b). Similarities and differences in prosocial moral reasoning between Brazilian and Anglo-American college students. Interam. J. Psychol. 33: 151–172.Google Scholar
  14. Colby, A., and Kohlberg, L. (1987). The Measurement of Moral Judgment, Vol. 1: Theoretical Foundations and Research Validation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 113–126.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, M. H., and Franzoi, S. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. J. Res. Pers. 25: 70–87.Google Scholar
  18. Eagly, A. H., and Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic reviewof the social psychological literature. Psychol. Bull. 100: 283–308.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, N., Cameron, E., Tryon, K., and Dodez, R. (1981). Socialization of prosocial behavior in the preschool classroom. Dev. Psychol. 71: 773–782.Google Scholar
  20. Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B., and Van Court, P. (1995). Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Dev. 66: 1179–1197.Google Scholar
  21. Eisenberg, N., and Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In Damon W. (Series ed.) and Eisenberg, N. (Vol. ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (5th edn.). Wiley, New York, pp. 701–778.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., and Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child Dev. 70: 1360–1372.Google Scholar
  23. Eisenberg, N., and Miller, P. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychol. Bull. 101: 91–119.Google Scholar
  24. Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., and Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. J. Early Adolesc. 19: 5–16.Google Scholar
  25. Green, B., Shirk, S., Hanze, D., and Wanstrath, J. (1994). The Children's Global Assessment Scale in clinical practice: An empirical evaluation. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 33: 1158–1164.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In Eisenberg, N. (ed.), The Development of Prosocial Behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp. 218–231.Google Scholar
  27. Hoffman, M. L. (1991). Empathy, social cognition, and moral action. In Kurtines, W. M., and Gewirtz, J. L. (eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, Vol. 1: Theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 275–301.Google Scholar
  28. Ickes, W., Stonson, L., Bissonnette,V., and Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 730–742.Google Scholar
  29. Iannotti, R. J. (1985). Naturalistic and structural assessments of prosocial behavior in preschool children: The influence of empathy and perspective taking. Dev. Psychol. 21: 46–55.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, R. C., Danko, G. P., Darvill, T. J., Bochner, S., Bowers, J. K., Huang, Y.-H., Park, J. Y., Pecjak, V., Rahim, A. R. A., and Pennington, D. (1989). Cross-cultural assessment of altruism and its correlates. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 10: 855–868.Google Scholar
  31. Kohlberg, L., and Candee, D. (1984). The relation between moral judgment and moral action. In Kurtines, W. M., and Gewirtz, J. L. (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development. Wiley, New York, pp. 52–73.Google Scholar
  32. Kurdek, L. (1978). Perspective taking as the cognitive basis of children's moral development: A review of the literature. Merrill-Palmer Q. 24: 3–28.Google Scholar
  33. Ladd, G. W., and Profilet, S. M. (1996). The Child Behavior Scale: A teacher-report measure of young children's aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors. Dev. Psychol. 32: 1008–1024.Google Scholar
  34. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Matthews, K. A., Batson, C. D., Horn, J., and Rosenman, R. H. (1981). Principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others: The heritability of empathic concern for others. J. Pers. 49: 237–247.Google Scholar
  36. Rest, J. (1983). Morality. In Mussen, P. (Series ed.) and Flavell, J. H., and Markman, E. (Vol. eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Cognitive Development. Wiley, New York, pp. 556–629.Google Scholar
  37. Rholes, W. S., and Bailey, S. (1983). The effects of level of moral reasoning in consistency between moral attitudes and related behaviors. Soc. Cogn. 2: 32–48.Google Scholar
  38. Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., and Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 2: 1–11.Google Scholar
  39. Rydell, A. M., Hagekull, B., and Bohlin, G. (1997). Measurement of two social competence aspects in middle childhood. Dev. Psychol. 33: 824–833.Google Scholar
  40. Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., and Piliavin, J. A. (1995). The Psychology of Helping and Altruism: Problems and Puzzles. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz, S. H. (1968). Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in social situations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 10: 232–242.Google Scholar
  42. Schwartz, S. H., and Howard, J. A. (1984). Internalized values as motivators of altruism. In Staub, E., Bar-Tal, D., Karylowski, J., and Reykowski, J. (eds.), The Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior: International Perspectives on Positive Development. Plenum, New York, pp. 229–255.Google Scholar
  43. Selman, R. L. (1980). The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding: Developmental and Clinical Analyses. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Staub, E. (1978). Positive Social Behavior and Morality: Social and Personal Influences, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Swisher, J. D., Shute, R. E., and Bibeau, D. (1985). Assessing drug and alcohol abuse: An instrument for planning and evaluation. Measur. Eval. Counsel. Dev. 17: 91–97.Google Scholar
  46. Underwood, B., and Moore, B. (1982). Perspective taking and altruism. Psychol. Bull. 91: 143–173.Google Scholar
  47. Weir, K., and Duveen, G. (1981). Further development and validation of the Prosocial Behavior Questionnaire for use by teachers. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Disciplines 22: 357–374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustavo Carlo
    • 1
  • Brandy A. Randall
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Nebraska –Lincoln
  2. 2.University of Nebraska –LincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations