Advertisement

Journal of Superconductivity

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 37–42 | Cite as

Mapping the Spin-Injection Probability on the Atomic Scale

  • D. W. Bullock
  • V. P. LaBella
  • Z. Ding
  • P. M. Thibado
Article

Abstract

A spin-polarized electron current is injected into the GaAs(110) surface at 100 K by using a polycrystalline ferromagnetic Ni scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) tip. The injected electrons recombine to the valence band and emit circularly polarized radiation whose degree of light polarization is related to the polarization of the conduction-band electrons at the instant of recombination. When the polarized electrons are injected into clean, flat terraces an average polarization for the emitted radiation is found to be 6.79%, while over the 10-nm step region the polarization is reduced to 0.46%. This step scattering effect is studied further by varying the tunneling gap through adjusting the tunneling current. As the distance between the STM tip and sample decrease the spin-scattering effect of the step edge is enhanced.

spin injection GaAs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    G. A. Prinz, Phys.Today 48, 58 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.D. Awschalom and J. M. Kikkawa, Phys.Today 52, 33 (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. F. Alvarado and P. Renaud, Phys.Rev.Lett. 68, 1387 (1992).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. F. Alvarado, Phys.Rev.Lett. 75, 513 (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Moran-Lopez and J. Sanchez, New Trends in Magnetism Magnetic Materials and Their Applications (Plenum, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. P. La Bella et al., Science 292, 1518 (2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. C. Miller, D. A. Kleinman, W. A. Nordland Jr., and R. A. Logan, Phys.Rev.B 23, 4399 (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Zerrouati et al., Phys.Rev.B 37, 1334 (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. T. Pierce and F. Meier, Phys.Rev.B 13, 5484 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Fromme, G. Baum, D. Gockel, and W. Raith, Phys.Rev.B 40, 12312 (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. E. Pikus and A. N. Titkov, in Optical Orientation, F. Meier and B. P. Zakharchenya, eds. (Elsevier Science, New York, 1984), p. 73.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.W. Gadzuk, Phys.Rev. 182, 416 (1969).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. A. Politzer and P. H. Cutler, Phys.Rev.Lett. 28, 1330 (1972).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. N. Chazalviel and Y. Yafet, Phys.Rev.B 15, 1062 (1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. W. Bullock
    • 1
  • V. P. LaBella
    • 1
  • Z. Ding
    • 1
  • P. M. Thibado
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsThe University of ArkansasFayetteville

Personalised recommendations